Riders
Well-Known Member
I go to meetings for my addiction on the phone. I go 4 to 7 times a week depending on how I feel.
Sometimes the Christian church says addiction is a sin you need to repent for it. Some in the church have a Christianized version of the 12 Steps, they accept the idea of being powerless over their addiction but they also believe they can get well, and eventually start calling themselves a recovered alcoholic.
They might stop going to meetings after a while.
The secular AA and other 12 step programs want you to do the first 3 steps we admitted we were powerless over alcohol that our lives had become unmanageable. Then they stay long term 5 20 15 years or more in the programs saying they will never be cured.
But my uncle quit going to meetings about after 10 years in the program he never went back to drinking.
My Mom stayed in 34 years till she died. So is it a bad thing for people to stay in AA and other 12 steps to stay in recovery forever without feeling like they have recovered as the religious 12 Step groups say?
AA teaches its a disease that can not be cured we can only learn to live with it. So what does disease it mean the definition of disease where addictions are concerned?
I do not agree with the Christianized AA because I am not Christian. So should the Christian believe alcoholism is something you can conquer and get the victory over; or should we believe its a dangerous disease that we never get rid of and learn to live with it?
What about everyone else in other religions, is it a disease, a sin or something you need to be treated for the rest of your life?
So I see things differently than others. On the one hand I am in a secular program and believe I am in recovery, but I do not know that I will be there for 10 years. Id like to think after 5 years I could quit.
For me, my initial reaction is this. I am not Christian so I do go along with the disease theory.
However, I am picky who I hang with. I think there are alt of AAers and other 12 Steppers, who get physically clean but not spiritually clean.
So for instance 40 year old comes to get clean get sober has a few years of sobriety but still talks too much about his old drinking days, he still sleeps around with women, he still smokes, he still has no job and is very dependant on AA for his socializing and has a dependency on AA.
In order for me to be friends with one, I don't want to hang out with anyone who is not a winner, to me if I am really in the program there should differences in my life and spiritual life too.
I should be able to see differences in people if you're a dry alcoholic, physically sober but the same old person that's a toxic program. The reason that has something to do with the original question is addiction a disease
is because some of us addicts who believe we will bever recovery and have the disease all our lives, they use this as an excuse to not lead a spiritual life, physically sober not spiritually sober.
So should we treat as a disease or with medicine, some sort of medical program or religious ideas about sin?
Sometimes the Christian church says addiction is a sin you need to repent for it. Some in the church have a Christianized version of the 12 Steps, they accept the idea of being powerless over their addiction but they also believe they can get well, and eventually start calling themselves a recovered alcoholic.
They might stop going to meetings after a while.
The secular AA and other 12 step programs want you to do the first 3 steps we admitted we were powerless over alcohol that our lives had become unmanageable. Then they stay long term 5 20 15 years or more in the programs saying they will never be cured.
But my uncle quit going to meetings about after 10 years in the program he never went back to drinking.
My Mom stayed in 34 years till she died. So is it a bad thing for people to stay in AA and other 12 steps to stay in recovery forever without feeling like they have recovered as the religious 12 Step groups say?
AA teaches its a disease that can not be cured we can only learn to live with it. So what does disease it mean the definition of disease where addictions are concerned?
I do not agree with the Christianized AA because I am not Christian. So should the Christian believe alcoholism is something you can conquer and get the victory over; or should we believe its a dangerous disease that we never get rid of and learn to live with it?
What about everyone else in other religions, is it a disease, a sin or something you need to be treated for the rest of your life?
So I see things differently than others. On the one hand I am in a secular program and believe I am in recovery, but I do not know that I will be there for 10 years. Id like to think after 5 years I could quit.
For me, my initial reaction is this. I am not Christian so I do go along with the disease theory.
However, I am picky who I hang with. I think there are alt of AAers and other 12 Steppers, who get physically clean but not spiritually clean.
So for instance 40 year old comes to get clean get sober has a few years of sobriety but still talks too much about his old drinking days, he still sleeps around with women, he still smokes, he still has no job and is very dependant on AA for his socializing and has a dependency on AA.
In order for me to be friends with one, I don't want to hang out with anyone who is not a winner, to me if I am really in the program there should differences in my life and spiritual life too.
I should be able to see differences in people if you're a dry alcoholic, physically sober but the same old person that's a toxic program. The reason that has something to do with the original question is addiction a disease
is because some of us addicts who believe we will bever recovery and have the disease all our lives, they use this as an excuse to not lead a spiritual life, physically sober not spiritually sober.
So should we treat as a disease or with medicine, some sort of medical program or religious ideas about sin?