rosends
Well-Known Member
Exactly the point of the article. Thank you.No, it looks like selection bias.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Exactly the point of the article. Thank you.No, it looks like selection bias.
I have that same response to statements about website titles which don't address website content.Maybe it's just me, but I find myself getting immediately suspicious when a website calls itself "Honest Reporting".
If we're serious about Quellenkritik, then we have to draw consequences somewhere, and I find little point in drawing from explicitly biased sources.I have that same response to statements about website titles which don't address website content.
Source criticism should be based in a proven claim of bias, not from the inclusion of the word "Honest" in a title. And if practiced consistently, one would also have to assess the track record of the HRW before anything else.If we're serious about Quellenkritik, then we have to draw consequences somewhere, and I find little point in drawing from explicitly biased sources.
Sorry, that was a misunderstanding, then. I thought you were having a fit over my source criticism of CAMERA.Source criticism should be based in a proven claim of bias, not from the inclusion of the word "Honest" in a title. And if practiced consistently, one would also have to assess the track record of the HRW before anything else.