An insult? You follow a book that hasn't been updated in hundreds of years and you call my claim lacking of proof? (By the way we update modern school books quite often.)
A book sprung from divine revelation does not need to be "updated" as its messages of the state of man and his purpose is timeless. But your insult is your derisive implication that I follow faith blindly.
As a man of certain social mannerisms I would hardly label individuals I do not know with such slander.
Prove yaqwa. And tawhid was obviously written my educated man (prove me wrong.)
I cannot comprehend this statement, could you make this simpler for me please?
If something seems moral or splendid it is automatically divine?
Of course not, but if something constitutes the realities of purpose and stipulates a way to achieve that purpose it is. On every single level it establishes the correct and most practical method of living.
As I stated before, the solar system we live in will die in a way that makes the plague of gods seem pitiful by comparison.
What an arbitrary statement. What exactly are you stating.
We are a species of animal that can shape the world we live on, what we say and discuss is more important then the words of ancient men who's mouth they claim the words come from, has yet to be proven to exist.
Are you going to establish a cognizant claim? Are you implying that somehow progress and discussion is prohibited or restricted?