Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I never would have guessed without cheating. But it is cute.As separate creations, it should be easy to tell embryos of different creatures apart, right?
View attachment 30502
Almost as if there is a continuum in mammalian development... Implying shared developmental pathways...The ear slits suggest mammalian. Past that, I cannot tell.
As separate creations, it should be easy to tell embryos of different creatures apart, right?
As separate creations, it should be easy to tell embryos of different creatures apart, right?
View attachment 30502
Almost as if there is a continuum in mammalian development... Implying shared developmental pathways...
No real reason that an omnipotent creator should be restricted to re-using and fiddling with the same plan.And earlier embryos of different creatures too, right?
Not to scale
Sort of....Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny!!!
Sort of....Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny!!!
Well, perhaps. Or, perhaps He should have realized that a design that works well for groups that walk on four legs is not necessarily the best design for groups that walk on two legs.No real reason that an omnipotent creator should be restricted to re-using and fiddling with the same plan.
Was that really a guess?It's a bat embryo
I know!!!!As separate creations, it should be easy to tell embryos of different creatures apart, right?
View attachment 30502
No it's not. Bats are made of wood. :OpIt's a bat embryo
Let X=XNo it's not. Bats are made of wood. :Op