EverChanging
Well-Known Member
Does Gnostic Luciferianism tend to be pro-matter/pro-cosmic or anti-matter/anti-cosmic?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What does pro-matter/pro-cosmic or anti-matter/anti-cosmic mean ?Does Gnostic Luciferianism tend to be pro-matter/pro-cosmic or anti-matter/anti-cosmic?
What does pro-matter/pro-cosmic or anti-matter/anti-cosmic mean ?
But doesn't Gnosticism in general, entail belief in a demiurge and a true god? The end goal being some form of merger with the true god.Btw, among LHPers that don't identify as Satanists or Luciferians, pro-cosmic Gnosticism seems to be more common. One example would be the chaos magician Steve Dee who often refer to himself as Gnostic but is not anti-cosmic from what I can tell.
Anti-cosmic gnosticism yes (although even the writings of e.g. the MLO in parts read pretty anti-dogmatic and more in line of using the belief system as a tool and not as the end goal), but there also are more liberal interpretations of the myths, e.g. seeing it from a more psychological point of view with the demiurge and sophia representing different parts of one's own psyche or aspects of one's life.But doesn't Gnosticism in general, entail belief in a demiurge and a true god? The end goal being some form of merger with the true god.
What if the Lucifer wants people to use the cosmos for nefarious purposes? Am I cosmic or anti-cosmic there?But doesn't Gnosticism in general, entail belief in a demiurge and a true god? The end goal being some form of merger with the true god.
Why are you asking me?What if the Lucifer wants people to use the cosmos for nefarious purposes? Am I cosmic or anti-cosmic there?
Should I not?Why are you asking me?
Probably not since I know very little about this Cosmic / Anti-Cosmic stuff.Should I not?
The ToTBL is basically the same as the MLO I mentioned above (as is also mentioned in your second link, which btw includes only one of several myths used by them and also otherwise seems not completely reliable).
Depends on the details.What if the Lucifer wants people to use the cosmos for nefarious purposes? Am I cosmic or anti-cosmic there?
Where would one get a complete synopsis of their beliefs?The ToTBL is basically the same as the MLO I mentioned above (as is also mentioned in your second link, which btw includes only one of several myths used by them and also otherwise seems not completely reliable).
And they are anti-cosmic.
Their foundational work is Liber Azerate. It's in Swedish, but there are inofficial (and mostly incomplete) English translations floating around the web.Where would one get a complete synopsis of their beliefs?
Is this a pro-cosmic group of gnostic Luciferians?
The few pro-cosmic gnostic ones I encountered were neither.Gnostic Left Hand Path religions are about one of two things. One could be a philosophy of engaging excessively in material pleasures as to "burn out" one's link to the material world, and the other larger group is directly anticosmic.
Nearly all Gnostic Luciferianism/Satanism (most don't seem to differentiate between that) I've encountered so far was anti-cosmic.
Satanism in itself is normally rather pro-cosmic, and so if a Satanist decides to name themselves a Gnostic (an anti-cosmic belief in its myths), then it's most often done also to differentiate oneself from pro-comic Satanists which one doesn't consider oneself to belong to.
However, that doesn't mean that Gnostic LHPers would also be against carnality or materialism. In a way yes, because the spiritual is seen as higher as any worldly goals, but they are not like Gnostic Christians in that they would consider matter as sinful or something like that in and of itself. So in that way they are not very far from other spiritual LHPers.
What does pro-matter/pro-cosmic or anti-matter/anti-cosmic mean ?