Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And somebody ripped it out like a game of Mortal Kombat.Besides Romney, there was not a spine among them.
For those who often asked: "How could people back in the early thirties let it happen?", one need only look at the GOP and its enablers.
These enablers are doing a pretty good job themselves:
Considering these people are actively running a campaign to take Trump's job away, they can't be reasonably called ''Trump enablers''. Some have also voted in opposition to many of his key policies.
No, the other poster is correct. He's invoking the "Three Little Pigskins Theory".Considering these people are actively running a campaign to take Trump's job away, they can't be reasonnably called ''Trump enablers''. Some have also voted in opposition to many of his key policies.
No, the other poster is correct. He's invoking the "Three Little Pigskins Theory".
In the 1934 eponymous documentary, the incompetence of Larry, Moe, Curley
enabled the opposing team to win the football game.
You sure do think a lot about men and wet dreams.
Your claim begs questioning the premise...Unless you can prove they are ''bad'' on purpose, they aren't enabler; at least not in the common sense of the term. You would also have to demonstrate that they are doing bad in the first place too. Last I have seen, the polls look positive for the chances of any of them against Trump. While polls aren't always accurate, they are more accurate than gut feelings.
Lucille Ball was in this documentary.