Friends, thank you for responding to this thread that I started on Sept. 18. You make me feel much better than I did several weeks ago.
Mr. Emu wrote:
I have a question for you, if someone based an arguement off the Quran, or Hindu holy text, or Shinto holy writings, would you pay much heed to it?
I personally would "pay heed" to it because it is obviously the belief of other human beings and a study of human beliefs is fascinating to me. Now, would I BELIEVE it or would it BE IMPORTANT to me personally is another question. Only the BIBLE is truth to me because it is the Word of God.
Cvipertooth wrote:
While the Bible is essential to Christian growth and developement, you cannot always speak with people from the bible. This, for example, would be like going up to a relativist and saying "here's the bible, this is truth" All they have to say "well it's not true to me" When talking to non-christians you have to be able to connect with them from outside the bible. Once a basis of christianity has been found, then you begin to teach and to live from the bible.
I agree wholeheartedly!
Some others of you commented upon the authority of Scripture and questioned how some who call themselves Christian can possibly not solely believe the Bible.
Please let me share with you some of the pain I have been experiencing with my own Synod, and I am hoping you will comment about this.
I belong to a church that is now affiliated with the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (the ELCA). The ELCA, who has central offices in Chicago, is now studying whether or not the ELCA should condone the blessing of homosexual unions and condone the ordination of openly practicing homosexual persons to be pastors. This Lutheran synod is not the only Christian group studying this question, because you probably remember that the Episcopal Church in the USA has already approved having Eugene Robinson, a practicing homosexual man, become a Bishop in their church.
In 1513 the great cry of Martin Luther was "Word Alone, Grace Alone, Faith Alone!" He was arguing against the Roman Catholic Church of that time. Papal decrees promised salvation to those Christians who gave money to the church to rebuild St. Peter's cathedral. Luther said that only the Bible should be the source of our instruction and that the Salvation for which Jesus died is ours only through His Grace. We cannot do anything to save ourselves....we must only simply have true Faith in Him.
The ELCA, a LUTHERAN group, is now saying that the Bible is only one source to lead ourselves as Christians, and there is an equally valid other source. That other source is our own experiences as Christians and the experiences of other Christians. What this group of leaders within the ELCA is saying is, "Because so many Christians struggle with the issue of homosexuality, the condition must be OK and we should have our church bless them."
What happened to the great (AND CORRECT) cry of Luther: WORD ALONE! ???
Within this synod are also those who continue to believe in the Holy Scripture as the sole source of our inspiration from God. I belong to this group that is called (appropriately) WORD ALONE.
Here's the latest: I attended as an observer one of the meetings of the study group on this homosexual question. It is VERY clear that the ELCA will recommend the blessing of homosexual unions and also the ordaining of practicing homosexual pastors. The study group that will make the recommendation has been very politically "stacked" in that direction.
My little church believes as I do in the original cry of Luther. We will probably end up leaving the ELCA over this issue. And yet there are some in the ELCA that say, "How can you make this homosexual issue so big? It should not divide us."
This whole argument has grieved me much. What say all of you?