-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
EVOLUTION, what a lie.
- Thread starter Gharib
- Start date
Breathe
Hostis humani generis
Gharib
I want Khilafah back
but they only come to happen AFTER a bad mutation has taken place, no mutation whatsoever has made a creature better in some way other than it being sick and eventually getting around the disease.
this totaly disproves evolution, scientific records show the desperate attempts made by evolutionists to create a mutation that is benefical and have ended up turning experiment animals into freaks of nature.
even those cases that are natural from god, they too are not beneficial. how could evolution be correct in this case?
Breathe
Hostis humani generis
Who said that?
That's not so. Mutations can be beneficial or unbeneficial, and sometimes they can even reverse.
Via genetic manipulation and intentional mutation, scientists have been able to make a rice crop that can survive floods, which can potentially feed millions of people who would otherwise have gone hungry.
BBC NEWS | Science & Environment | Snorkel rice could feed millions
This is the kind of thing evolution does, albeit slowly.
skydivephil
Active Member
Well there has. In 1970's Japeese researches found a form of bacteria that could digest nylon. Since nylon was invented in 1935, its seems the bacteria got a new beneficial mutation.
To confirm if this was possible another set of scientists decided to expose bacteria that could not digest nylon into a nylon rich environment. If evolution is true then we might see the new mutation occur in this environment too. Thats exactly what happened and here is the original paper so you can check it yourself:
Emergence of nylon oligomer degradation enzymes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO through experimental evolution -- Prijambada et al. 61 (5): 2020 -- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
if you only want to read the headline, here it is:
"Through selective cultivation with 6-aminohexanoate linear dimer, a by-product of nylon-6 manufacture, as
the sole source of carbon and nitrogen, Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO, which initially has no enzyme activity to
degrade this xenobiotic compound, was successfully expanded in its metabolic ability. Two new enzyme
activities, 6-aminohexanoate cyclic dimer hydrolase and 6-aminohexanoate dimer hydrolase, were detected in
the adapted strain"
DarkSun
:eltiT
Eselam, don't listen to these people.
Mrs. Garrison is your most accurate source of knowledge.
Mr Garrison Describes Evolution
Mrs. Garrison is your most accurate source of knowledge.
Mr Garrison Describes Evolution
McBell
mantra-chanting henotheistic snake handler
sadly, far to many people honestly think that that is what evolution is.
Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
There has, frequently.
Now I have a question for you. How to expect to refute one of the world's leading scientific theories without understanding it?
Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
It would if it were true, but it's not, so it doesn't. Do you think scientists are this stupid?
Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
The Neo Nerd
Well-Known Member
If this was the way it actually happened it could explain how some of the creationists on this forum came into being.
*cough* Mickiel *cough*
-Q
DarkSun
:eltiT
Be nice.
He mightn't understand evolution (heck, I only know the minor details), but at least he's polite.
rageoftyrael
Veritas
if you understand the basics of evolution, then you would understand that there is no reason to argue against it. you can quibble about the details, but the fundamentals of evolution is solid. creationists just need to get used to it.
GiantHouseKey
Well-Known Member
Be nice.
Lol. Mickiel is quite possibly THE rudest person i've ever had the mispleasure of conversing with in my entire life.
Ending every post with the word 'Peace' does not make up for the previous 2 paragraphs of bigotted and misinformed insults.
GhK.
DarkSun
:eltiT
Really? My mistake then. I've only really read the first two pages of his threads before shaking my head and going somewhere else. He seemed nice enough.
Gharib
I want Khilafah back
although i do not accept anything you guys have presented, not they they aren't facts, but they do not support evolution, i think we should move coz if we continued with this further you guys aren't going to accept what i have to say.
so i have another question, evolution says living matter formed from non living matter, can i see some examples thanks.
so i have another question, evolution says living matter formed from non living matter, can i see some examples thanks.
Gharib
I want Khilafah back
if they were this stupid, i would consider them smart due to their efforts, but unfortunately they are worse.
Gharib
I want Khilafah back
where have i said that i don't understand evolution?
and just so you know theories are very easy to refute, facts however aren't.
Eselam, this question has been answered on this forum 10,000 times. Evolution says absolutely nothing about the origin of life. It is concerned with the development of different species.
Abiogenesis is the theory that covers life from non-life. Basically, amino acids can form spontaneously in natural chemical reactions. Amino acids are the building blocks for proteins. Once you make a protein, all you need then is for it to become self-replicating. The most popular theory is that an RNA-like substance was the first self-replicating compound.