Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
Lol, that like saying a rock in the woods is a house.They're the building blocks of life
Only much worse, because life is much more complex than that. You need a DNA code for starters.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Lol, that like saying a rock in the woods is a house.They're the building blocks of life
And do you assume they get everything right about ancient volcanos too? How incredibly naive.Claiming that an event must be observed before scientists can study it and draw conclusions about it is just plain ridiculous and quite ignorant. If that were so, geologists couldn't study or say anything about glacial erosion of U-valleys or ancient volcanic eruptions.
The assumption that they are the oldest rocks is highly debatable.You can't explain why there is evidence of no life in the oldest rocks
I don't assume that a "medical professional" is right either.I was waiting to see how long before you took the thread this direction again.
It isn't my fault that you can't figure out subtleties in simple questions.
Are are you afraid to admit that you wouldn't ask expert medical advice from a plumber, because his point of view would not be sufficient in normal cases to offer sound, rational medical opinion?
Bingo!What is it about this topic that gets some theists so riled up? If evolution has no bearing on the existence of God, why do some Christians insist that we must reject it in favour of a literal interpretation of the book of Genesis?
Facepalm!Creationist sources do not count. If people cannot support their claims by going through peer review why would you believe them?
And here we have yet another attempt by a creationist to drag science down to the level of religion. Which is an admission of sorts, isn't it?IDK, seeing as I'm not riled up. I'm amused how many people defend evolution theory as if it's the Holy Grail.
Never mind that it's always changing. Darwin believed bears could evolve into whales for goodness sake.
It's like so many people cannot see the obvious flaws.
Please present your studies demonstrating a causal relationship between school shootings, suicides and hopelessness with the teaching of evolution in schools.You have a popular, accepted myth.
And I understand that evidence doesn't exist for molecules to many evolution.
So we have schools teaching the myth that we are merely advanced primates and then we wonder why there are school shootings, hopelessness and high suicide rates.
Rationality isn't a matter of opinion. A person who is thinking rationally is a person who is making arguments based on, or in accordance with reason and logic You've already demonstrated that you employ logical fallacies in your attempt to argue against evolution. For example, you've asserted arguments from personal incredulity several times in this thread. That is irrational.I don't believe that the overall theory of evolution is rational, or that defending it is sound reasoning.
So from my point of view you're the one making up irrational claims.
I used to see the world from a Christian point of view back when I was a Christian.Only it hasn't.
It has been explained away, by people who already accept the overall theory, and refuse to step out of that box, and view history from another angle.
No, it isn't. It's like saying the trees in the woods are some of the building blocks used to construct a house.Lol, that like saying a rock in the woods is a house.
Only much worse, because life is much more complex than that. You need a DNA code for starters.
Nonsensical conspiracy garbage.Facepalm!
"Peer review" is actually often another term for "bias." as in, "we only accept material that fits our preconceived notions."
Facepalm!
"Peer review" is actually often another term for "bias." as in, "we only accept material that fits our preconceived notions."
Thanks for pointing out the need for a designer and architect.No, it isn't. It's like saying the trees in the woods are some of the building blocks used to construct a house.
Evolution is the religion of many. Nothing wrong with religion, but don't pretend is doesn't require faith.And here we have yet another attempt by a creationist to drag science down to the level of religion. Which is an admission of sorts, isn't it?
It's like you guys are following a poorly written playbook.
You still don't understand analogies.Thanks for pointing out the need for a designer and architect.
Evolution is the religion of many. Nothing wrong with religion, but don't pretend is doesn't require faith.
You've missed the point again.Thanks for pointing out the need for a designer and architect.
Nonsense. It's a scientific theory, like plate tectonics or germ theory of disease.Evolution is the religion of many. Nothing wrong with religion, but don't pretend is doesn't require faith.