Salam
Alif Lam Meem is one meaning from one perspective. From another, it has many meanings. How is this possible?
It's possible by a concept of double implications. A double implication two phrases that imply each other. I am proposing alif lam meem has many sentence that all are double implications of one another.
Alif for example can stand for "Allah"
Lam For "Laho"
Meem Mulk
"God for him is the Authority"
Now implied by that per Quran is:
"The Authority is for Mohammad"
"Al-Amr le Mohammad"
The other way is true to,
"The Authority is for Mohammad" implies "God for Him is the Authority"
This is what I mean by double implications.
Now you can also derive
"The family to them is the Authority" implied by the two, and it implies the other two.
"Al-Aul lahum al-Mulk"
And you can get:
"Al-Aul le Mohammad"
"The family is for Mohammad"
Meaning the chosen Ahlulbayt is for Mohammad (s) and that implies the other facts and is implied by those facts.
You can get
"Al-Aul lel Mulk"
Which is similar, but means "The family is for the Authority" this would mean Ahlulbayt are established for God to establish his authority.
You can also get "Al-Amr lel Malik"
"The Authority is for the King", king can be God here, the True King, or a king he appoints such as Talut.
And you can get:
"Al-Aimma lahum Al-Mulk"
"The leaders to them belongs the Authority"
Now the authority is Majestic and is the way God is majestic through Ahlulbayt (a) and his favor upon humanity such that all praise belongs to him and his favor is complete:
"God to him belongs the Majesty"
This is the phrase we find emphasized in tafsir Hassan Al-Askari (a) quoting Imam Jaffar (a). Another in hadiths is:
"I am God the King", and we can see this would imply all other phrases and would be implied. The only difference, al-lah, takes the lam, but that is because al part of allah is used in the phrase with al lah (the God).
There are of course many more implications and implied by all implication words. The thing is if you understand how these are implications of one another, you understand Islam as it meant to be.
"I am God the Majestic" is another line....
"The name is for the Authority"
"The name is for the Majesty"
"The name belongs to the King"
"The name belongs the Authority"
"The name of God is the Authority"
"The name of God is the Majesty"
"Submission is to the Authority"
"Submission is to the King"
"Submission is to the majestic"
"Submission is to Mohammad"
And will uncover more of these type of implications of one another with rest of the mysterious letters.
I put in the debate section so that people can try to refute the plausibility or reasons I believe this is what these letters are.
One meaning, with many phrases. The meaning is the same on a truth table, they are all double implications, which in logic means logically equivalent.
Alif Lam Meem is one meaning from one perspective. From another, it has many meanings. How is this possible?
It's possible by a concept of double implications. A double implication two phrases that imply each other. I am proposing alif lam meem has many sentence that all are double implications of one another.
Alif for example can stand for "Allah"
Lam For "Laho"
Meem Mulk
"God for him is the Authority"
Now implied by that per Quran is:
"The Authority is for Mohammad"
"Al-Amr le Mohammad"
The other way is true to,
"The Authority is for Mohammad" implies "God for Him is the Authority"
This is what I mean by double implications.
Now you can also derive
"The family to them is the Authority" implied by the two, and it implies the other two.
"Al-Aul lahum al-Mulk"
And you can get:
"Al-Aul le Mohammad"
"The family is for Mohammad"
Meaning the chosen Ahlulbayt is for Mohammad (s) and that implies the other facts and is implied by those facts.
You can get
"Al-Aul lel Mulk"
Which is similar, but means "The family is for the Authority" this would mean Ahlulbayt are established for God to establish his authority.
You can also get "Al-Amr lel Malik"
"The Authority is for the King", king can be God here, the True King, or a king he appoints such as Talut.
And you can get:
"Al-Aimma lahum Al-Mulk"
"The leaders to them belongs the Authority"
Now the authority is Majestic and is the way God is majestic through Ahlulbayt (a) and his favor upon humanity such that all praise belongs to him and his favor is complete:
"God to him belongs the Majesty"
This is the phrase we find emphasized in tafsir Hassan Al-Askari (a) quoting Imam Jaffar (a). Another in hadiths is:
"I am God the King", and we can see this would imply all other phrases and would be implied. The only difference, al-lah, takes the lam, but that is because al part of allah is used in the phrase with al lah (the God).
There are of course many more implications and implied by all implication words. The thing is if you understand how these are implications of one another, you understand Islam as it meant to be.
"I am God the Majestic" is another line....
"The name is for the Authority"
"The name is for the Majesty"
"The name belongs to the King"
"The name belongs the Authority"
"The name of God is the Authority"
"The name of God is the Majesty"
"Submission is to the Authority"
"Submission is to the King"
"Submission is to the majestic"
"Submission is to Mohammad"
And will uncover more of these type of implications of one another with rest of the mysterious letters.
I put in the debate section so that people can try to refute the plausibility or reasons I believe this is what these letters are.
One meaning, with many phrases. The meaning is the same on a truth table, they are all double implications, which in logic means logically equivalent.
Last edited: