Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What should we name the new thread?Fluffy said:Its too much for one thread and I didn't really intend this thread for discussion of that site at all, I was just using it to exemplify my point. I would like to debate the points as well but another thread is best I think.
II tend to agree with nutshell on this. It is relating to Man's knowledge and limitations, Not taking into account that we, man, are not the greatest thing there is. I was disappointed into the lack of thought that actually went into their answers.
Exactly, frubals to you good sirch'ang said:I
personally am disappointed in the lack of thought in your refutation of their points, just saying god can't be understood by man in itself proves that your view of god is inconsistent (sorry if I am being presumptuous but I assume that your is the god described in the bible . When you say that god can not be understood by man you obviously say that god is illogical because if he wasn't then man could in time come to understand him. So if god is illogical and can not be understood why do you claim to know that he wants you to believe in him and his son. Also why do you think he wants anything, wanting something is a human emotion and it seems a bit egotistical to say god thinks the same way you do.