A
angellous_evangellous
Guest
Jeez, I'm afraid to read my own thread.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The US ousted Saddam and what followed was not foreseen and i dont know why! someone should be held accountable for not knowing it would descend into civil war and that the coalition was not prepared for it doing so.
I never believed saddam was in legue with Alqueda. but Saddam was in league with other terrorist groups for decades and its well documented, groups such as Abu Nidal group and The Palestine Liberation front amongst others. Its well known his support for suicide bombers and even paid the families of "Martyrs" The murderer Abu Abbas even held an Iraqi diplomatic passport.
Some people hold the US responsible for every death in Iraq since ousting Saddam i do not. The ousting of Saddam was a golden opportunity for Iraqis unfortunately Civil war ensued and coalition troops were in the unenviable position of acting as Policemen. that should not have happened.
Well let's think really hard. We invade your country and occupy it. What do you think the reaction will be? Historic ethnic hostilities are repressed by a brutal dictator. What might happen if we remove the lid from the pot?
are you speaking with hindsight here? because i dont know about you, but i had no idea it would be that bad. unprecedented i would say. Absolute hell on Earth. we removed the lid and replace it with coalition troops but the pot had already boiled over.
I opposed it because it violated International Law. I don't remember what I thought about what would happen afterward. I know that they fired a guy for giving an estimated cost of IIRC $2 billion, and it has turned out to cost over a trillion. Rumsfeld refused to listen to anyone who wanted to tell him there would be problems. He actually told them that if anyone wanted to give him any negative information, he would fire them.
It would be a mistake to condemn a president for doing business with thugs without thorough analysis. As past wars have shown,
the greatest good sometimes results from cooperating with unsavory types. Compared to other presidents, Reagan looks pretty
good....& I voted against him.
Do you think the monetary cost, the damage to U.S. integrity and credibility, plus the lost lives of coalition troops and innocent civilians was worth it?
I've made my statement, no war should last ten years.
If you would be so kind, please give me your opinion of why Obama has not brought everyone home yet?
[youtube]b0NLyx83v3Q[/youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0NLyx83v3Q
Thats OK.I meant when he was President. Sorry I wasn't clear about that.
As far as I want less government intrusion in my life and would like to pay the least taxes as possible.:yes:Holy crap you're a tea bagger.
As far as I want less government intrusion in my life and would like to pay the least taxes as possible.:yes:
You won't see me in a video with a swastika sign or making racist remarks. :no:
I live in Kentucky where my Senators are Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul and we are proud of them.:sorry1:
I opposed it because it violated International Law. I don't remember what I thought about what would happen afterward. I know that they fired a guy for giving an estimated cost of IIRC $2 billion, and it has turned out to cost over a trillion. Rumsfeld refused to listen to anyone who wanted to tell him there would be problems. He actually told them that if anyone wanted to give him any negative information, he would fire them.
There were lots of mistakes and reckless and maybe even criminal decisions made. But in my opinion a lot of these were made after the successful removal of Saddam and his regime.
Consequences are known to happen after their causes.