Dispelling the myth of “hypothesis”

[Joshua Pryce]

And based on rigorous testing (eg multiple evidence, multiple experiments),

(A) the hypothesis would either be accepted because it has been verified by the evidence,

(B) or rejected because the evidence refuted the hypothesis.

The problem with so much science nowadays, is that the evidence in science comes from personal perspective. Think about the story of the shroud of turin. Its the burial cloth of Jesus to some and is backed by some scientists but disregarded by others. My personal view is worldwide agreement and irrefutable perfected executed evidence and deeply simpleminded logical insight. That is the basis of foundational 100% provable hypothesis.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The problem with so much science nowadays, is that the evidence in science comes from personal perspective. Think about the story of the shroud of turin. Its the burial cloth of Jesus to some and is backed by some scientists but disregarded by others. My personal view is worldwide agreement and irrefutable perfected executed evidence and deeply simpleminded logical insight. That is the basis of foundational 100% provable hypothesis.

Nope.

Okay, you do not understand science or logic. Would you like to?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

The problem with so much science nowadays, is that the evidence in science comes from personal perspective.

What does this mean?

Think about the story of the shroud of turin. Its the burial cloth of Jesus to some and is backed by some scientists but disregarded by others.

Which scientists and how many?

My personal view is worldwide agreement and irrefutable perfected executed evidence and deeply simpleminded logical insight. That is the basis of foundational 100% provable hypothesis.

I see. So you are unaware that "proof" is not a standard of science that all scientific conclusions and explanations are contingent.