Did The MSM Cost Trump The Election?

[Kooky]

Suggest you take a look at George Soros funding activities

George Soros does not own a single media outlet.

Rupert Murdoch directly controls a multinational conglomerate of media companies and publishing firms operating television networks, newspapers, and websites across the anglophone world, and has been known to be a strong influence on these companies' political outlook. Don't tell me you never heard of the guy!

 

[Kooky]

What's the matter @metis, can't handle the truth?

So tell us, why does Fox News refuse to cover these stories even though they once claimed to support Trump?
Is Rupert Murdoch in collusion with Joe Biden, or is there an even more sinister connection?

 

[esmith]

So tell us, why does Fox News refuse to cover these stories even though they once claimed to support Trump?
Is Rupert Murdoch in collusion with Joe Biden, or is there an even more sinister connection?

Gee, I guess you didn't read @metis post #12/
So to make you and @metis happy.
Gingrich: Media, Big Tech election manipulation most ‘corrupt, scandalous’ action in American history
Rep. Jim Jordan: Big Tech And The Media's Collusion To Squash The Hunter Biden Laptop Story Impacted The 2020 Presidential Election

 

[Shadow Wolf]

MSM? Men who have Sex with Men?

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Trump lost because he's Trump. American may be crazy, but we aren't THAT crazy!

Yup. The People of the United States of America rejected his orange *** TWICE!

 

[Shadow Wolf]

VP Nominee Kamala Harris’s extreme liberal voting record in the Senate

LMAO!! Extremely liberal, lol.
You know she backed the state and trampled on trans rights.
Try going by real standards instead of hyper partisan standards that make Reagan look like a Centrist.

 

[fantome profane]

MSM? Men who have Sex with Men?

Medieval sword makers.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Medieval sword makers.

I really hate how it's become common to use acronyms and initialisms without explanation. It's hideous that it's accepted, and mildly anti-social as it assumes everyone knows what you know and has the same perspectives.

 

[Guitar's Cry]

Medieval sword makers.

Mint strawberry marmalade?

 

[Kooky]

Gee, I guess you didn't read @metis post #12/
So to make you and @metis happy.
Gingrich: Media, Big Tech election manipulation most ‘corrupt, scandalous’ action in American history
Rep. Jim Jordan: Big Tech And The Media's Collusion To Squash The Hunter Biden Laptop Story Impacted The 2020 Presidential Election

So it's not actually "the mainstream media" as you claimed earlier, but the platforms traditionally beloved as bringers of proper right-wing lore - Youtube, Facebook, Twitter et al.

 

[Heyo]

Suggest you take a look at George Soros funding activities

Which media empires does Soros own?

 

[tytlyf]

Which media empires does Soros own?

The anti-Soros crowd likes to ignore the biggest corrupt donors in their own Republican party.
The Koch brothers. The Kochroaches easily spend 50x the amount of money compared to Soros.
People like esmith never complain about them. Indoctrination.

 

[Kooky]

People like esmith never complain about them. Indoctrination.

Of course not, these billionaires advance causes they themselves support.

The logic is not one of principles, but of opposing teams.

 

[esmith]

Of course not, these billionaires advance causes they themselves support.

The logic is not one of principles, but of opposing teams.

No, it is not opposing teams but of opposing ideas. There are those that are on the other "team" whose ideas and policies are acceptable to the other "team".
If one does not undestand that, they are just lost in the jungle of their own contrived bubble.

 

[Kooky]

No, it is not opposing teams but of opposing ideas.

You mean, like Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Equality, or the Pursuit of Happiness? Those ideas, that literally every single political faction and organization of note in the US claims to support, pursue, or embody?

Or are you talking about a completely different set of ideas that has nothing at all to do with any of these?

 

[esmith]

You mean, like Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Equality, or the Pursuit of Happiness? Those ideas, that literally every single political faction and organization of note in the US claims to support, pursue, or embody?

Or are you talking about a completely different set of ideas that has nothing at all to do with any of these?

Policies that affect those.

 

[Kooky]

Policies that affect those.

Policies are enacted by governments, and neither Soros nor Koch have ever served in the capacity of a government official, so those cannot be the reason for your opposition to one billionaire and apparent support of another.

You are clearly not opposed to billionaires owning media empires that propagate ideas you support, so where does your opposition come from?

 

[esmith]

Policies are enacted by governments, and neither Soros nor Koch have ever served in the capacity of a government official, so those cannot be the reason for your opposition to one billionaire and apparent support of another.

You are clearly not opposed to billionaires owning media empires that propagate ideas you support, so where does your opposition come from?

Why should I be opposed to anyone owning media empires that support what I do. Would be stupid if I did; however, I would say something about anything
they say or do if it opposes what I believe.
Do you support anyone that agrees with your policies, or only those that others of your political views support?

 

[Secret Chief]

I really hate how it's become common to use acronyms and initialisms without explanation. It's hideous that it's accepted, and mildly anti-social as it assumes everyone knows what you know and has the same perspectives.

Trouble is it's everywhere, AFAIK.

 

[Heyo]

Why should I be opposed to anyone owning media empires that support what I do. Would be stupid if I did; however, I would say something about anything
they say or do if it opposes what I believe.

That confession deserves a frubal.
It shows how and why tribalists are so often hypocrites. While an outsider looks at a policy and asks how it can be useful and just for everybody, the tribalist only sees the momentary benefit for her/his tribe and will condemn the exact same thing when done by an opposing tribe.