Ive seen this video before years ago. I did watch it again though as a refresher.
Few things about it id like to point out.
1, they say newton did not propose a supernatural cause.
This is false, newton in fact believed in God and did propose that intelligence was behind the ordering of the universe.
2, they and the judge really went after the motives of the people, the funders of ID and the ID scientists. They went after the motives more rather then the evidence for design.
Finding the motivation behind a theory or organization is fine and dandy, but the evidence needs to be adressed on its own merits.
Also, and this is a fact! That any religion can adhere to ID, not just christianity, not just fundamentalism, but also jews, muslims and others. In fact, even those who believe aliens made us can and DO adhere to ID. Theres a guy name salvador who comes on this forum and he believes aliens made us. So, thats a form of intelligent cause. Thats NOT religion. Seeing evidence of a intelligent cause is not religion in and of itself. If that wer the case then your post and my post, which comes from us (which us is intelligence) would be religion. And of course, to propose that is rediculious. Likewise, the evidence for design shows intelligence, that needs to be adressed on its own two feet. Thats not religion. The motives of people may or may not be religious, but ID has scientific evidence. Period.
3, the issue of the word "creationism" and "intelligent design" they say is the same.
This is a thing of samantics. Who cares if its called creation, design or even engineering. The evidence is there.