Karolina
Member
I am trying to understand why the removal of a healthy part of a human organ came to represent a covenant with God. I'm particularly interested in hearing from those of you who have a more Liberal and less literal understanding of the Scriptures, since I get that the latter would basically say "God told us to and we don't question God". I can respect that.
My Question is, if your tradition has taken a more allegorical approach to scripture interpretation, then why does infant circumcision remain such an ingrained part of your Jewish identity? Especially in the United States, where it does not actually set you apart since it's so common among American gentiles. And what's more, I wonder how exactly would one's private parts set anyone apart from others? It's the most private part of the body that I would imagine most people do not generally share with others. So how can most people tell that you're circumcised and therefore committed to God?
I've read lots of secular rhetoric for and against male infant circumcision when making my decision to leave my son intact, and I really still don't get it. I can appreciate an adult choosing this as a way to show his commitment to God (I guess?) But marking a baby this way seems odd to me. And I don't mean that disrespectfully, I just don't get it, that's all. And I know there's a movement within Judaism (and Islam, which also calls for circumcision) of intactivists, so I'm not completely out in left field questioning this practice.
Thanks for whatever insights you can give me.
My Question is, if your tradition has taken a more allegorical approach to scripture interpretation, then why does infant circumcision remain such an ingrained part of your Jewish identity? Especially in the United States, where it does not actually set you apart since it's so common among American gentiles. And what's more, I wonder how exactly would one's private parts set anyone apart from others? It's the most private part of the body that I would imagine most people do not generally share with others. So how can most people tell that you're circumcised and therefore committed to God?
I've read lots of secular rhetoric for and against male infant circumcision when making my decision to leave my son intact, and I really still don't get it. I can appreciate an adult choosing this as a way to show his commitment to God (I guess?) But marking a baby this way seems odd to me. And I don't mean that disrespectfully, I just don't get it, that's all. And I know there's a movement within Judaism (and Islam, which also calls for circumcision) of intactivists, so I'm not completely out in left field questioning this practice.
Thanks for whatever insights you can give me.