Hey JayJayDee, are you sure you're an oldtimer? That name sounds like you're a rapper. And a rapper that is Christian and with an Aussie accent? That would be awesome!
I don't consider myself an "oldtimer" but there are those who do.
Youth is wasted on the young IMO.
I am far from a rapper but the Aussie accent is authentic. JayJay was my nickname as a kid.
But you said, "If the parents are not believers and the children are young, they are classified the same as their parents." So are you saying that the kids would not go to the Christian version of heaven but would go with their parents to where all non-Christians go? Which I assume is hell?
No. I don't believe in either of those destinations as the churches teach them. The Bible teaches something entirely different. Rather than being an "either/or" arrangement, there is so much more to what these designations mean.
We all actually go to the Bible's "hell"...does that surprise you? But "hell" is nothing like what you have been led to believe. It is simply the grave. In Hebrew it is "sheol" and in Greek, "hades". Neither of these places involve any kind of consciousness or suffering. They are a place to "rest in peace". (Eccl 9:5, 6, 10)
Everyone who dies goes to the same place. The difference is, who God wakes up in the resurrection. Jesus said he was going to call the dead out of their graves. They were going to hear his voice and "come out", just as he did with Lazarus. (John 5:28, 29; John 11:11) In order to be called out from the grave, people would still have to be in them. The God of the Bible never tortured anyone for any reason. He is not a fiend. Much of the Bible's language is symbolic, not literal.
"Gehenna" (often misleadingly translated "hell") is a prime example of this.
Gehenna was the Valley of Hinnom outside Jerusalem's walls. It was the city's garbage dump where fires were kept burning day and night by the addition of brimstone (sulfur) to consume the refuse. The carcasses of dead animals and the bodies of executed criminals were cast into the flames to consume their bodies. These were considered unworthy of a descent burial and therefore unworthy of a resurrection. It was considered by Jesus' Jewish audience that having no memorial tomb, meant not being remembered by God in the resurrection. It was not more sinister than that.
One problem is that most other religions don't have the Christian "born into sin" situation. The child is born innocent and is judged by what they do with their lives. I even like a Hindu-type of explanation that could tentatively allow all of us to experience life as the shooter, the children, the parents, etc. In that scenario we would go to the spiritual realm and have to tell ourselves we're sorry for shooting ourselves, and we, as the victims, would have to forgive ourselves as the perpetrator.
That is one way of looking at things, but it has nothing to do with the Bible's message. It always saddens me when people turn away from Christianity to find kinder explanations for the way life is.....all because of what the churches teach. They will answer for that, but people who really want to find the God of the Bible will look deeper and realize that what they have been taught all their lives at church, is a bunch of lies.
When the foretold apostasy occurred early in Christianity's history, Christ left the building! He was with the "wheat" but he never supported the horrendous actions of the "weeds".
I have to agree with Pleinmont in his response to InChrist's comment that he believes that "the scriptures show that God cherishes all children." Pleinmont said, "The Bible doesn't support your comments at all, the deity featured there doesn't give a monkey's about children or anyone else for that matter!"
It's nothing like that. All that God does has a higher purpose. The issues raised in Eden have very broad implications, not just for humankind, but for all of God's intelligent creatures. This is soooo NOT just about us. The first rebel was not human. Think bigger.
Cities being blown up, the world flooded, all the men, woman, and children in Jericho killed? For the Christian it is easy to say, "God has a good reason." To those of us that don't believe or are trying to examine religious truth, it is impossible to judge the God of the Bible as a nice, loving being.
Everything in the Bible is pictorial, designed to teach us something. We can look at the surface of things and be appalled, or we can ask what God was demonstrating by his actions?
Think deeper. Physical death is not the worst thing that can happen to us. We are all on death row from the moment we are born. It is not the manner of death but the restoration of life once all the issues are settled that matters.
This is God's promise....
For here I am creating new heavens and a new earth; and the former things will not be called to mind, neither will they come up into the heart" (Isa 65:17)
When 'all things are made new', there will be no recall of any of the events that caused us to grieve.
The apostle John backed that up in Revelation 21:2-5...
"I saw also the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God and prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. With that I heard a loud voice from the throne say: Look! The tent of God is with mankind, and he will reside with them, and they will be his peoples. And God himself will be with them. And he will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore. The former things have passed away.
And the One seated on the throne said: Look! I am making all things new. Also, he says: Write, because these words are faithful and true.
These are the promises God makes in the Bible. They fill us with hope...not despair.
The rule of God's kingdom (New Jerusalem) will bring joy and peace to the earth, eliminating all causes of grief and suffering.
I think this "age of accountability" loophole is merely an attempt by some Christians to excuse God for killing or allowing kids to be brutally killed. If it were a rock-solid doctrine then God and Jesus should have made it perfectly clear and said, "On the day you're old enough to understand that your first parents sinned and passed it on to you, on that day, you'll be accountable. You need to believe on my son Jesus at that very moment or face the possibility of me allowing you to be killed and being sent to hell forever. You don't even want to risk it. Believe now, follow my commandments and all will be fine. If I decide to have someone kill you, you can then rest assured I will admit you into heaven to be with me forever."
None of that is Bible teaching...it is
church teaching. Please don't confuse the two.
Jewish parents were under obligation to teach their children......
Listen, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one Jehovah. And you must love Jehovah your God with all your heart and all your soul and all your vital force. And these words that I am commanding you today must prove to be on your heart; and you must inculcate them in your son and speak of them when you sit in your house and when you walk on the road and when you lie down and when you get up. And you must tie them as a sign upon your hand, and they must serve as a frontlet band between your eyes; and you must write them upon the doorposts of your house and on your gates" (Deut 6:4-9)
Christian parents were likewise commanded to instruct their children in God's ways....
"Children, be obedient to your parents in union with [the] Lord, for this is righteous: Honor your father and [your] mother; which is the first command with a promise: That it may go well with you and you may endure a long time on the earth. And you, fathers, do not be irritating your children, but go on bringing them up in the discipline and mental-regulating of Jehovah". (Eph 6:1-4)
Since there is no "heaven and hell" as portrayed by Christendom, the parents in this case taught their children about God's requirements and the importance of 'living' them. Life and death are surely involved, but not "heaven and hell" as opposing destinations.
Like I said, I don't mind if Christians make amendments to their beliefs, just admit it. But if they say "Bible only" and pretend they don't change and adapt their beliefs to the changing times, then I can't take them or their interpretation of the Bible seriously.
Don't confuse "Christians" with promoters of erroneous church doctrine.
Never the twain shall meet!
The Bible's message is awesome when you ditch the doctrines of false Christianity.
Something to think about