• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Christianity - Has it been a net gain or loss in world history?

Has Christianity been a net gain or loss on world history?

  • Christianity has been a net loss on the world we would have been better off without it.

    Votes: 15 51.7%
  • Christianity has been a net gain on the world we are been better off because of it.

    Votes: 14 48.3%

  • Total voters
    29
  • Poll closed .

ChristineES

Tiggerism
Premium Member
I find it odd that you think all KKK members hate blacks.

Maybe hate was too strong a word. I have heard them speak and I know that they think that whites are superior to every one else. I don't know of any Christians that think they are superior (although I assume that you have)- after all one of Jesus commands was to be humble.
 

Smoke

Done here.
Maybe hate was too strong a word. I have heard them speak and I know that they think that whites are superior to every one else. I don't know of any Christians that think they are superior (although I assume that you have)- after all one of Jesus commands was to be humble.
What is the difference between thinking oneself superior and thinking oneself more pleasing to god?
 

ChristineES

Tiggerism
Premium Member
What is the difference between thinking oneself superior and thinking oneself more pleasing to god?

That is where you get it wrong, at least for most of us. We don't think we are better, we know we sin as much as anyone else. We also know that anyone can have God's forgiveness if they want it. If anyone can have it, then it wouldn't make us special if we have it.
 

kmkemp

Active Member
I think it's time to stop feeding the troll. If she wants to use her own definition of Christian (and refuse to acknowledge that the authority on the matter is God) to slander the whole, then why bother continuing? Maybe we should start a thread where we just continually bash gays and ignore every logical statement about prejudice.
 

Smoke

Done here.
I think it's time to stop feeding the troll. If she wants to use her own definition of Christian (and refuse to acknowledge that the authority on the matter is God) to slander the whole, then why bother continuing? Maybe we should start a thread where we just continually bash gays and ignore every logical statement about prejudice.
There are plenty such threads -- and plenty such churches. From what you say, it sounds like your church is one of them.

But when you say the authority is god's, what you really mean is your idea of god; you give all authority to your own ideas.

It doesn't matter how you define "Christian." Give me any definition you like, and then show me the Christian church that treats LGBTs as the church members would like to be treated. They are out there, but there are damned few of them, and I doubt you'd feel comfortable in them.
 

Francine

Well-Known Member
Give me any definition you like, and then show me the Christian church that treats LGBTs as the church members would like to be treated.

The Epsicopal Church is very friendly to lesbians, but unfortunately their holy orders is absolutely null and utterly void.
 

Smoke

Done here.
The Epsicopal Church is very friendly to lesbians, but unfortunately their holy orders is absolutely null and utterly void.
They also don't treat gay men and lesbians the same as they treat heterosexuals.

And by the way, people, check the sex tags. I mentioned lesbianism when I was talking to Christine because she's a woman. I'm not. ;)
 

kmkemp

Active Member
They also don't treat gay men and lesbians the same as they treat heterosexuals.

And by the way, people, check the sex tags. I mentioned lesbianism when I was talking to Christine because she's a woman. I'm not. ;)

Ah sorry about the confusion then. Nonetheless, there is not one Christian that would argue the definition of a Christian since it is plainly laid out in scripture.
 

rojse

RF Addict
Ah sorry about the confusion then. Nonetheless, there is not one Christian that would argue the definition of a Christian since it is plainly laid out in scripture.

Rubbish - we argue about it here all the time - "can a true Christian [insert idea/attribute that some find questionable]" eg. be a homosexual, believe in evolution, etc.
 

Captain Civic

version 2.0
Rubbish - we argue about it here all the time - "can a true Christian [insert idea/attribute that some find questionable]" eg. be a homosexual, believe in evolution, etc.

He's talking bare bones of the faith. When people add "true", they are more often than not referring to certain parts of Scripture which deal with the issue at hand (eg. homosexuality). I don't think it's a stretch to say if you believe in Christ and accept His sacrifice, you're a Christian. I can't see anyone debating that.
 

roli

Born Again,Spirit Filled
I think the term"Christian" is used to loosely in this thread and around the world.

To answer that question first answer
What your definiton of one being a Christian is ????????????
 

Smoke

Done here.
I think the term"Christian" is used to loosely in this thread and around the world.

To answer that question first answer
What your definiton of one being a Christian is ????????????
In my experience, when people want to quibble about what a "true" Christian is, their idea of true Christianity is never any less backward, bigoted, oppressive, coercive and violent than any other version -- usually it's just the opposite -- so I don't see how it could possibly matter. When considering the effect of Christianity on history, Christian behavior matters a lot more than the details of belief.
 

kmkemp

Active Member
In my experience, when people want to quibble about what a "true" Christian is, their idea of true Christianity is never any less backward, bigoted, oppressive, coercive and violent than any other version -- usually it's just the opposite -- so I don't see how it could possibly matter. When considering the effect of Christianity on history, Christian behavior matters a lot more than the details of belief.

Except that the definition of Christianity rules out the acts that you wish to attribute to it.
 

Smoke

Done here.
Except that the definition of Christianity rules out the acts that you wish to attribute to it.
Well, let's cover a few points and see. You consider yourself a real Christian, right? Let's see what a real Christian thinks about some issues:

1) Would you approve or disapprove of letting a gay male couple join your church?
2) Would you approve or disapprove of letting a lesbian couple marry in your church?
3) Would you approve or disapprove of the ordination of a transgendered person as a minister of your church?
4) In 2003, did you approve or disapprove of George W. Bush's unprovoked invasion of Iraq?
5) How about now?
6) Do you approve or disapprove of George W. Bush's decision to imprison people for years on Cuban soil without charging them with any crime?
7) Do you approve or disapprove of George W. Bush's decision to use extraordinary rendition -- that is, sending prisoners to backwards countries to be tortured?
8) Do you approve or disapprove of the Bush administration's decision to spy on American citizens who are not suspected of any crime?
9) Do you approve or disapprove of teaching Intelligent Design in public schools?
10) Do you approve or disapprove of full legal equality, including marriage, for LGBTs?
11) With regard to Osama bin Laden, what do you think is the proper attitude for a Christian to take?
12) With regard to Hillary Clinton, what do you think is the proper attitude for a Christian to take?
 

kmkemp

Active Member
Well, let's cover a few points and see. You consider yourself a real Christian, right? Let's see what a real Christian thinks about some issues:

I think you've probably missed the point here... again. Nonetheless, I will do my best to answer.

1) Would you approve or disapprove of letting a gay male couple join your church?
2) Would you approve or disapprove of letting a lesbian couple marry in your church?
3) Would you approve or disapprove of the ordination of a transgendered person as a minister of your church?
4) In 2003, did you approve or disapprove of George W. Bush's unprovoked invasion of Iraq?
5) How about now?
6) Do you approve or disapprove of George W. Bush's decision to imprison people for years on Cuban soil without charging them with any crime?
7) Do you approve or disapprove of George W. Bush's decision to use extraordinary rendition -- that is, sending prisoners to backwards countries to be tortured?
8) Do you approve or disapprove of the Bush administration's decision to spy on American citizens who are not suspected of any crime?
9) Do you approve or disapprove of teaching Intelligent Design in public schools?
10) Do you approve or disapprove of full legal equality, including marriage, for LGBTs?
11) With regard to Osama bin Laden, what do you think is the proper attitude for a Christian to take?
12) With regard to Hillary Clinton, what do you think is the proper attitude for a Christian to take?

1. disapprove
2. disapprove
3. disapprove
4. neither, not informed enough
5. disapprove, but still don't think i have all of the information for that answer
6. disapprove
7. disapprove
8. disapprove
9. disapprove
10. disapprove of marriage, approve of full legal rights of marriage
11. I don't understand your question
12. Again, I don't understand. I'm not going to vote for her, if that's what you mean.
 

Smoke

Done here.
Well, I have to admit I'm impressed. Your answers were much more peaceful than I'd have got from the Evangelicals I live among.

Nevertheless, your attitudes toward LGBTs cause more harm than you know, and I would reject your religion on that ground alone. I know firsthand the harm it causes to queer kids, and I've seen the harm it causes to their families -- and in many cases, to the ill-suited spouses in a vain attempt to be something they aren't. Maybe a third of us commit suicide. A disproportionate number of us have drug or alcohol problems. That's not because we're inherently suicidal, or because we're more naturally disposed to substance abuse. It's because so many of us grow up in homes where your attitudes are prevalent, and it screws with our minds and hearts in ways I doubt you can imagine.

So I commend you (sincerely) for having a more compassionate and beneficent form of Christianity than many, but I can still say without any qualification that your form of Christianity still causes immeasurable harm. I don't think you intend it to, and maybe you don't even believe that it does. But it does, nevertheless. Forget about the Crusades, the Inquisition, and all the other historical crimes of Christianity. If they had never happened, this one point is enough to make your Christianity immeasurably cruel and harmful. Whether you know it or not.
 
Top