Can anyone answer this?

[Brian2]

???

Which science says that "stones become conscious"?
Never heard of that.

You should get out move.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

You should get out move.

I don't comprehend this sentence.

Anyhow, have I misunderstood your post?
It seemed to me as if you were implying that science states that stones can become conscious.

If I misunderstood, then I apologize and you can disregard my post.
Well, actually, you can disregard it either way off course. It's a free world.

 

[Aupmanyav]

The Bible is a good source of information about such things as spirit, it is inspired by God after all.

Yeah, for Christians.

You will die, so a God is worth the effort to seek out.

People die, IMHO, no seeking required for that. God or no God, soul or no soul. I sought and did not find anything to support the theory.

 

[David Weaver]

There are a million questions science does not have the answer to. It is also a bit presumptuous to assume all of this was caused.

That's not presumptuous, cosmology states that everything that exists has a beginning (cause) our universe exists therefore our universe has a beginning or cause. If science claims this how can I be presumptuous for following what science says is FACT

 

[David Weaver]

Who told you that the Universe including spacetime etc. Arises from nothing? That's a very peculiar notion. Especially since nothing or nothingness is an abstract human concept. Very odd. Puzzling.

Stephen Hawking for starters believes that. Nothing is not an abstract concept. Nothing means the absence of anything. If you have something it's not nothing. People seem to be trying to change the definition of nothing

 

[TheBrokenSoul]

Stephen Hawking for starters believes that. Nothing is not an abstract concept. Nothing means the absence of anything. If you have something it's not nothing. People seem to be trying to change the definition of nothing

Nothing in general life is not the same context as nothing in physics . In physics nothing is {x0,y0,z0} , known as a point . A volume of nothing is the absence of all matter known technically as a void . There are many {x0,y0,z0} in a void . In the beginning there was no thing that occupied {x0,y0,z0} and that is why we have God .

 

[Azrael Antilla]

You will die, so a God is worth the effort to seek out.
It's something you can do in your spare time,,,,,,,,,,,,,while you are not saving the world.

Death is not something I worry about. At all. I have no need of Gods.

 

[Azrael Antilla]

Stephen Hawking for starters believes that. Nothing is not an abstract concept. Nothing means the absence of anything. If you have something it's not nothing. People seem to be trying to change the definition of nothing

When does he claim that? Nothing by definition cannot exist. It's an abstract concept. It's not a physical description that exists in science.

There are many metaphysical hypothesis that attempt to describe the conditions they existed before the universe did.

For example, the QM many worlds multiverse hypothesis.

 

[Azrael Antilla]

Nothing in general life is not the same context as nothing in physics . In physics nothing is {x0,y0,z0} , known as a point . A volume of nothing is the absence of all matter known technically as a void . There are many {x0,y0,z0} in a void . In the beginning there was no thing that occupied {x0,y0,z0} and that is why we have God .

Why do we have some revolting God? Your comment provides no explanation.

 

[Brian2]

I don't comprehend this sentence.

Anyhow, have I misunderstood your post?
It seemed to me as if you were implying that science states that stones can become conscious.

If I misunderstood, then I apologize and you can disregard my post.
Well, actually, you can disregard it either way off course. It's a free world.

I was implying that science is saying that chemicals can become conscious.

 

[Brian2]

Yeah, for Christians.People die, IMHO, no seeking required for that. God or no God, soul or no soul. I sought and did not find anything to support the theory.

It is not a theory in the Bible, it is history.

 

[Aupmanyav]

You should mention that is your view. Not even all Christians agree to that.
Historicity of the Bible - Wikipedia

 

[Brian2]

You should mention that is your view. Not even all Christians agree to that.
Historicity of the Bible - Wikipedia

Yes there are Christians who pretty much say the Bible is a fiction it seems, but at that stage they have probably dropped out of Christianity.
Maybe I should say "imo" but usually people understand that anyway.

 

[Aupmanyav]

You should say IMO. I get frequent warnings because of that.

 

[Brian2]

You should say IMO. I get frequent warnings because of that.

Naughty boy.
My warnings are for other things usually.
But no doubt you are right and I should use imo.

 

[Azrael Antilla]

I was implying that science is saying that chemicals can become conscious.

Why would you imply such a silly and absurd thing? Science says no such thing.

 

[Brian2]

Why would you imply such a silly and absurd thing? Science says no such thing.

Why does science imply it then?

 

[Aupmanyav]

Well, congregations of molecules can certainly do so. That is what we are.

 

[TheBrokenSoul]

I was implying that science is saying that chemicals can become conscious.

I noticed somebody said they don't imply this , I agree with you , they do imply this .

 

[TheBrokenSoul]

Yes there are Christians who pretty much say the Bible is a fiction it seems, but at that stage they have probably dropped out of Christianity.
Maybe I should say "imo" but usually people understand that anyway.

All religious scripts and books are fictional to some degree but that doesn't necessarily mean God is fictional.