apophenia
Well-Known Member
There isn't much difference between Brahman and Buddha-Nature...also, Buddha is an Avatar of Lord Vishnu anyway,
To clear that up for you - that verse was added to Srimad Bhagavatam long after Gautama's time to begin the process of subverting buddhism and making it hinduism.
Look at the dates. Vaishnavas often claim that Srimad Bhagavatam is 5000 years old. So how does a text which is 5000 years old have references to someone who lived 2500 years ago ? Obviously it can't. Those references to Gautama being an expansion of Vishnu are utterly bogus edits made by overly zealous hindus.
You can see that same kind of stunt being pulled here, as I referred to just a moment ago.