Try again. You're not making any sense.What makes the Bible anymore credible than other religious books.What the heck is an inclusive view on .. credibility? Inclusive of what?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Try again. You're not making any sense.What makes the Bible anymore credible than other religious books.What the heck is an inclusive view on .. credibility? Inclusive of what?
I have requested further information. But if that is the case, don't the claims of Jesus as "I the way " become debatable?
Try again. You're not making any sense.
My apologies, the real question must be this: How can we know that Jesus is the true and living God?
'We' cannot.How can we know that Jesus is the true and living God?
Nothing makes it "more credible" other than some human saying so. Credibility of mythology is a subjective assessment, and, IMHO, completely missing the point of mythology in the first place. Whether or not someone regards mythology as "credible" is irrelevant; the point is to be guided and inspired by the stories.
Then again, I've never understood the perspective that something should be "inspired by the gods" or some such in order to be worth learning from. Not just because I find everything is of the gods, but because there is something worth learning from absolutely everything regardless of it being "credible" or "valuable" based on some human's authority claims.
You're an adult; you make your own decisions. Learn from what you want, be inspired by what you want, like what you want. You don't need anyone to make these decisions for you. So long as it enriches your life, go for it.
Ah but how ominously does hell loom!
Just out of curiosity, does it say anything about really big type?
Not very, if you're a Baha'i.
The Baha'i scriptures state ...
Peace,
Bruce
As usual, I'll give the dumb answer. The Christian Bible is constructed by adding the NT books to a slightly reorganized Tanach. If you want to call it the 'Inspired Word' then you have to define what 'Inspired' means. Literally 'Inspired' means one person breathing into another person's mouth. The NT books are somewhat difficult reading, even if you've read the Tanach first. Its not as simple as 'Breathing in' the material.Timidly said:I am seeking an inclusive view on the credibility of the Christian Bible. Is it truly the inspired Word of God?
Probably do not need three versions of the same thread, also credulity and credibility are not exactly synonymous.
Personally I find the credibility of the document dubious based on the simple recognition of human fallibility, we cannot be certain that we can authenticate the authorship (whether divine or even merely secular) of various parts of the bible, let alone the content therein. In addition from my understanding examination of particular historical and factual claims in the bible have not been borne out by objective investigation therefore I am dubious not only of the authenticity but of the accuracy.
Just out of curiosity, does it say anything about really big type?