Does science have to prove how the universe could have been created without a god before atheism can be accepted as a reasonable belief?
Why or why not?
Ike Asimov wrote an essay many years ago showing how it would be possible for the Universe to come into being without violating the Law of Conservation of Mass-Energy.
I ask because I've heard it said several times that atheists or evolutionists must be wrong because they don't know how everything got here in the first place.
Does science have to prove how the universe could have been created without a god before atheism can be accepted as a reasonable belief?
Why or why not?
If you claim that the methane ice on Eris comes from the eructations of the Mystical Space Cow, and I don't know where the methane ice on Eris comes from, do I have to believe in the Mystical Space Cow?
I ask because I've heard it said several times that atheists or evolutionists must be wrong because they don't know how everything got here in the first place.
Well, next time you hear it ask the person to prove how God can exist. When they can't do it tell them their teachings can't be accepted as a reasonable belief.