Ask me about the Third Reich, National Socialism, Hitler & the Holocaust

[Saint Frankenstein]

When I use to go to the gay bar, I would were studded leather and a SS cap, I had all the girly boys worried lol.

Hahaha. Sounds very '70s.

 

[psychoslice]

Hahaha. Sounds very '70s.

Na, around the eighties, I'm 58 now, but still feel like kid lol. Oh yea, I love your new Avatar.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Na, around the eighties, I'm 58 now, but still feel like kid lol. Oh yea, I love your new Avatar.

Thanks.

 

[Whiterain]

The US Dress uniforms are extremely nice as well.

When I use to go to the gay bar, I would were studded leather and a SS cap, I had all the girly boys worried lol.

This threads gone awry. That's hilarious, Sir.

I went to a gay club once with my inconceivably homosexual brother. I can't believe someone hadn't thrown a bomb in that place or it give wake to some horrible massacre. HIV Blood everywhere.


The uniforms were high quality for certain, I don't believe that's faux leather they were wearing.

The US Military regularly changes their dress uniforms, the older browns were much more appealing in my opinion.

 

[psychoslice]

The US Dress uniforms are extremely nice as well.


This threads gone awry. That's hilarious, Sir.

I went to a gay club once with my inconceivably homosexual brother. I can't believe someone hadn't thrown a bomb in that place or it give wake to some horrible massacre. HIV Blood everywhere.


The uniforms were high quality for certain, I don't believe that's faux leather they were wearing.

The US Military regularly changes their dress uniforms, the older browns were much more appealing in my opinion.

I think that was part of my best life, going to the gay bars, you could have a lot of fun without some jerk wanting to fight as you get in strait bars, even my mum love the bar. I love police in uniform as well, mmmm.

 

[Whiterain]

My word, there are a lot of homosexuals here on this forum. I got wise before thinking twice with strangers that want to scrap, **** all that business, I ain't getting shived. Been attacked by thugs numerous times though, even thrown off an overpass by a mugger, walking the streets to late.

No place a Man should find himself a 3AM anyway.

Nietzsche, What do you know about Nazi weapons? I never studied them.

 

[psychoslice]

Yes homo's are usually good people, with more of them there would be less wars, a bit of scratching, but no wars.

 

[lewisnotmiller]

Nietzsche, What do you know about Nazi weapons? I never studied them.

Hey Whiterain, I have a fair background on them, although to some degree it depends on which weapons you're interested in.
Still, knowledge ranges from smattering through to a bit to much for some people's comfort.
Armour and air would be specialties.

 

[Nietzsche]

Apparently not, since she and Adolf were pussies who offed themselves like cowards. Himmler, too.

Hitler was many things, but a coward isn't one of them. You don't survive a mustard-gas attack, or fight a (failed) revolution, or what have you and also be a coward. His single-minded determination & strength of will might be the two aspects of Hitler that a

Nietzsche, What do you know about Nazi weapons? I never studied them.

Which ones? Artillery, armour, aircraft, surface fleet, uboats, small arms..?

 

[Whiterain]

Infantry weapons, what can you tell me about Nazi rifles?

 

[Nietzsche]

Infantry weapons, what can you tell me about Nazi rifles?

For 99% of the war, the Wehrmacht was using the Mauser Karabiner 98 Kurz, most often shortened to K98. As a rifle, it is almost identical to what the Kaiserriech used, the Gewehr 98. This may seem like a terrible idea, given that the G98 was designed in 1898, but in truth the G98 is undoubtedly one of, if not the, most influential rifle in history. Every bolt-action rifle worth a damn made after it used the exact same bolt-action mechanism, regardless if the rifle was designed by Brits, Yanks, French, Japanese or Russians.

The K98 was just an even further refinement of the already excellent G98. The only real differences is that it's shorter(and thus easier to maneuver) and other small improvements that aided the new emphasis on mobile warfare.

The thing that made the Mauser Bolt-action design so perfect is the fact that, regardless of what happens to the rifle, even if you're firing a round with too high a grain, the bolt will not fly back into your skull and kill you. It is guaranteed not to fail up to 100,000 PSI.

It was the Kalashnikov of Bolt-actions. You can learn the intricacies of using the rifle in a matter of minutes. It can take all manner of abuse. It's a beautiful, wonderful rifle. One that has no equal in regards to influence, ease of use & versatility.

In fact, if you've ever seen a Springfield 1903, it's...just a Mauser bolt-action that happened to be built in America. The bolt is literally exactly the same.

 

[Whiterain]

For 99% of the war, the Wehrmacht was using the Mauser Karabiner 98 Kurz, most often shortened to K98. As a rifle, it is almost identical to what the Kaiserriech used, the Gewehr 98. This may seem like a terrible idea, given that the G98 was designed in 1898, but in truth the G98 is undoubtedly one of, if not the, most influential rifle in history. Every bolt-action rifle worth a damn made after it used the exact same bolt-action mechanism, regardless if the rifle was designed by Brits, Yanks, French, Japanese or Russians.

The K98 was just an even further refinement of the already excellent G98. The only real differences is that it's shorter(and thus easier to maneuver) and other small improvements that aided the new emphasis on mobile warfare.

The thing that made the Mauser Bolt-action design so perfect is the fact that, regardless of what happens to the rifle, even if you're firing a round with too high a grain, the bolt will not fly back into your skull and kill you. It is guaranteed not to fail up to 100,000 PSI.

It was the Kalashnikov of Bolt-actions. You can learn the intricacies of using the rifle in a matter of minutes. It can take all manner of abuse. It's a beautiful, wonderful rifle. One that has no equal in regards to influence, ease of use & versatility.

In fact, if you've ever seen a Springfield 1903, it's...just a Mauser bolt-action that happened to be built in America. The bolt is literally exactly the same.

All these rifles and even the Nagant are super affordable while the M1 Garand went into super infamy as well as the Thompson is even more expensive, some cost up to $30,000.

I'd love to have a Thompson, but I learned it was an inferior assault rifle compared to other automatic rifles. The .45 calibur slug is not a long range round, close range however, it will obliterate someone.

I plan on picking up a Nagant carbine with some fast-loader clips, those are dirt cheap as well.

$200-400 rifle, best money you will ever spend in your life.

The Reich weapons were disgraced though, if I remember correctly. I'm sure you can still find them, but Reich editions are may be a bit more pricey.

 

[Nietzsche]

All these rifles and even the Nagant are super affordable while the M1 Garand went into super infamy as well as the Thompson is even more expensive, some cost up to $30,000.

I'd love to have a Thompson, but I learned it was an inferior assault rifle compared to other automatic rifles. The .45 calibur slug is not a long range round, close range however, it will obliterate someone.

The Thompson isn't an assault rifle. It's a sub machine gun

I plan on picking up a Nagant carbine with some fast-loader clips, those are dirt cheap as well.

I have a Mosin Nagant, Not the carbine, the original rifle. Mother****er is massive.

 

[Whiterain]

The Thompson isn't an assault rifle. It's a sub machine gun


I have a Mosin Nagant, Not the carbine, the original rifle. Mother****er is massive.

Ya, that's why I wanted to shorter carbine.

Mr.Nietzsche has some class, a Mosin Nagant and knows excellent venison dishes.

Let's see here, Nazi questions...

I don't know if you had fully discussed your views on the Reich genetics for the Aryans.

Do you think it is something that should be kept in mind? Once it's gone, it's gone for good without some gene manipulation, I mean blue eyes and blonde hair.

That's the Ideal appearance of the Nord, which surprised me it's a Norwegian trait, even though they say it's a stereotype, I don't believe it is.

Had Hitler used the term "Nord" over "Aryan" I believe people would have been more familiar with what he was talking about. That being said, the Nazi approach was brutal, while natural, just criminal to kidnap children with the traits.

Raised to be Reich Mutters.

I don't know, I thought the ideal German was pale with blue eyes and jet black hair, while the Norwegian was the one with Blond hair and blue eyes. Swedes have beautiful red hair and Danes usually have brown.

Hitler man, he was insane. Then he attacks Scandinavia which would have had a wealth of these Nord Genetics.

 

[Nietzsche]

I don't know if you had fully discussed your views on the Reich genetics for the Aryans.

Had Hitler used the term "Nord" over "Aryan" I believe people would have been more familiar with what he was talking about. That being said, the Nazi approach was brutal, while natural, just criminal to kidnap children with the traits.

There was no confusion within the Reich. The confusion came after the fall, propagated by people who simply weren't well-informed about Nazi racial policy & categorization. I shall break it down as simply as I can, but keep in mind that I am going for jut the gist of it, not the nuances & such.

In the Nazi PoV "Aryans" were all European Peoples(barring Slavs, who were seen as Mongoloid/Asiatic). Aryan was a blanket term in that regard. The Italians, French, Romanians, Spaniards, Irish, Portuguese, Scandinavians, Germans, English, Welsh, Scottish, Dutch, Flems, Frisians, Walloons, Finns, Estonians, Lithuanians, Latvians, Bulgarians, Turks, Greeks & Croats (normally classed as Slavs, though the Nazis felt that they could claim descendane from the Goths, and that the Croats speak a Slav language due to a quirk of history).

This was something that those in the Riech & Europe understood. But within Aryanhood, there was a pecking order of sorts. At the top were the True Nordics, the Norwegian, Swedes and Danes(in that order). Beneath them were Germans, Dutch, Frisians & Flems, though those were seen as being equal amongst each other.

I have to stop now. I am fighting to stay awake. I'll finish then.

Hitler man, he was insane. Then he attacks Scandinavia which would have had a wealth of these Nord Genetics.

Do you think it is something that should be kept in mind? Once it's gone, it's gone for good without some gene manipulation, I mean blue eyes and blonde hair.


That's the Ideal appearance of the Nord, which surprised me it's a Norwegian trait, even though they say it's a stereotype, I don't believe it is.
I don't know, I thought the ideal German was pale with blue eyes and jet black hair, while the Norwegian was the one with Blond hair and blue eyes. Swedes have beautiful red hair and Danes usually have brown.

Again, I'll tackle this tomorrow. I love the racial aspects of Nazism, I'm just too tired to do it proper just at the moment. But have patience, for I am a Wizard, neither late nor early. I arrive exactly at the right moment, when I am needed.

 

[Shad]

What sources would you recommend reading covering religious views within Germany at the time? I am interested in the views of the masses expressed by the party and views expressed by the masses to the party. The religious dialogue between politicians and the average citizen.

 

[LuisDantas]

Hitler man, he was insane. Then he attacks Scandinavia which would have had a wealth of these Nord Genetics.

As I understand it, from his point of view it was not "attacking Scandinavia" but rather annexing Aryan territory and/or liberating it from "weak leadership" and the "threat of miscigenation" so that it could fulfill its destiny as part of the Reich of a Thousand Years.

 

[Nietzsche]

What sources would you recommend reading covering religious views within Germany at the time? I am interested in the views of the masses expressed by the party and views expressed by the masses to the party. The religious dialogue between politicians and the average citizen.

Think you could perhaps clarify that or reword it? I'm not entirely sure as to what you're asking.

As I understand it, from his point of view it was not "attacking Scandinavia" but rather annexing Aryan territory and/or liberating it from "weak leadership" and the "threat of miscigenation" so that it could fulfill its destiny as part of the Reich of a Thousand Years.

That's half of it. The other half is that Germany needed to control the Danish Straits, so that the British couldn't enter the Baltic sea, and in regards to Norway it was to secure resources vital to the German war effort as well as provide bases for U-Boats.

 

[Shad]

Think you could perhaps clarify that or reword it? I'm not entirely sure as to what you're asking.

What was the religious dialogue between the party and the masses before and during the war. For a modern example look at politicians bringing up religion when talking about family values and same-sex marriage. Current issue with conflicts in the Middle-East in which people bring up Islam or Judaism. Look at the Red Scare of the 1950 with atheism and the Soviets. Martin Lurther's work being injected into Nazi propaganda. Etc. I know a bit about the party's use of religion in house and with the public but I am interested in the masses views. Did they rationalize the war with religious view? To what level did the masses religion play into antisemitism? What groups, or individual, opposed the party on a religious basis. Was communism's atheistic stance countered by Christianity.

 

[Nietzsche]

What was the religious dialogue between the party and the masses before and during the war. For a modern example look at politicians bringing up religion when talking about family values and same-sex marriage. Current issue with conflicts in the Middle-East in which people bring up Islam or Judaism. Look at the Red Scare of the 1950 with atheism and the Soviets.

Ahhh.

Martin Lurther's work being injected into Nazi propaganda.

It should be stated: Hatred of Jews, in both Nazi Germany and the rest of contemporary Europe, had little to nothing to do with Judaism. It was a racial/ethnic opposition & hate.

Etc. I know a bit about the party's use of religion in house and with the public but I am interested in the masses views. Did they rationalize the war with religious view? To what level did the masses religion play into antisemitism? What groups, or individual, opposed the party on a religious basis. Was communism's atheistic stance countered by Christianity.

Honestly, there was no unified "program" regarding religion in the Nazi party. There were devout Protestants, Catholics and such who were equally devout Nazis. There was also a small number of hardcore atheist Nazis. But as far as Hitler was concerned, the 'Crusade against Bolshevism" had no singular reason. It was the sum of religious, racial, cultural & pure realpolitik(that is military & economic) reasons.

However it should also be said that were devout/hardcore Protestants, Catholics, atheist and other such people vehemently opposed to at least some parts of the Nazi party.