dad
Undefeated
Support your worm kinship then, I guess.The difference is that I can support my claims. You not so much. By the way, why do you take offense at reality? That seems to be a very pointless anger.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Support your worm kinship then, I guess.The difference is that I can support my claims. You not so much. By the way, why do you take offense at reality? That seems to be a very pointless anger.
Support your worm kinship then, I guess.
I explained that what I claimed was how science doesn't know about the exact nature of time in the far universe. That is no story, that is fact.Duh! You don't want it to be the same so you make up stories. You make up a lot of stories. Instead of making up stories, --- NAH! That's your thing. That's what allows you to continue to have your literalist beliefs.
Correct, it doesn't. Ha ha.Science doesn't know what forces existed in Noah's day
Doesn't matter if we know why. The only issue is whether we know it was the same or not.Just because you need things to have been different, you must pretend that things were different "back then". Of course, you have no explanation for why that would be the case
Not my demand. Your claim of worm kinship is so foolish I could not care less whether you fail to support it and pretend you could or not.Need I remind you that you disqualified yourself from making such demands?
When you are ready to learn the basics of the sciences that you do not understand and learn those basics then you can start to make demands. I am more than willing to help you to learn. So are others.
No. "TO be" in the future.More specifically: "to be Ruler in Israel".
For that part of your prophecy to be true, Jesus would have had to have ruled Israel for a period of time. Jesus did not rule Israel - ever! So, this part of your prophecy is a failure. Therefore, the entire prophecy is a failure. That's not even a nice try. Perhaps you were going for a participation trophy.
I explained that what I claimed was how science doesn't know about the exact nature of time in the far universe. That is no story, that is fact.
Correct, it doesn't. Ha ha.
As I pointed out, I place that time at approx
near the time of the KT layer. So if you knew what you were talking about you would simply prove that forces and laws here were the same then.
Doesn't matter if we know why. The only issue is whether we know it was the same or not.
Not my demand. Your claim of worm kinship is so foolish I could not care less whether you fail to support it and pretend you could or not.
I quoted a verse of Quran in the footnotes of my post. I was referencing to Quran/Islam/Muhammad, not to the Bible (OT/NT). So, please rewrite one's reasoning. Right, please?Yes but that is not what the Bible says. You are reinterpreting the Bible after the fact since it is clearly wrong as written. It is wiser to simply treat it as a morality tale. The story itself is bad theology as written. It makes God look incompetent and evil.
The ultimate source is the same.I quoted a verse of Quran in the footnotes of my post. I was referencing to Quran/Islam/Muhammad, not to the Bible (OT/NT). So, please rewrite one's reasoning. Right, please?
Regards
____________
We know your religious beliefs. Also noticed is your inability to support them and your imaginary time scale. The basis for those dates is radioactive dating. That means that you believe the same nature existed also in the past. Prove it...or keep your religion, I have my own beliefs, thanks. Conversely, you could pretend you did already and fail for scores of wasted posts after wasted posts to show a link to where you supposedly evidence your beliefs. Great way to close a thread ..endless boring spam.The KT layer was deposited roughly 65 million years ago. Long before man was alive.
Please, don't break the Ninth Commandment. Anyone that has followed this thread know that you post the ability to demand evidence when you rejected evidence and then refused to learn what is and what is not evidence.We know your religious beliefs. Also noticed is your inability to support them and your imaginary time scale. The basis for those dates is radioactive dating. That means that you believe the same nature existed also in the past. Prove it...or keep your religion, I have my own beliefs, thanks. Conversely, you could pretend you did already and fail for scores of wasted posts after wasted posts to show a link to where you supposedly evidence your beliefs. Great way to close a thread ..endless boring spam.
"The ultimate source is the same"The ultimate source is the same.
Muslims source of their religion is the same as the of the Jews."The ultimate source is the same"
What ultimate source one means? Please elaborate.
Regards
I am gratefull that you call this an alternative.The alternative is that we are just a rather insignificant blip on the edge of one of billions of galaxies in the vastness of the cosmos.
Your indoctrination doesn't allow that. Your need to feel significant doesn't allow that.
A belief in magic is not a "realization" .I am gratefull that you call this an alternative.
I am just as happy to find your statement "Your need to feel significant", rubber sticking to you.
is it not so that you want to feel significant against a Creator?
Of corse you do, this is why you use such an argument to imply that somehow I will feel "Significant" in my belief that God created it all to sustain life on earth.
Oh, I forgot, the atheist theories dilute the thought that Matter could come into existence from nothing as if it is nothing to ponder over.
Whist the Christian realises such creation needs divine act.
Plainly, your wish that there be life discovered in the universe is somehow a wish to argue against a creator, whilst I dont worry about it at all.
I agree wholeheartedly.A belief in magic is not a "realization" .
And what is the source of Judaism as per one's perception, please?Muslims source of their religion is the same as the of the Jews.
Nope, you still don't get it. You believe in magic. Evolution can be observed and is understood. Now reality may bother you. I can appreciate that. The real world can be very scary at times. The question is: Can you get over your fears?I agree wholeheartedly.
One can not get a human from an amphibean.
The "frog prince magic"
The myths of the ancient Hebrews. Seriously, you did not notice the similarities between your myths?And what is the source of Judaism as per one's perception, please?
Regards
My dear friend.Nope, you still don't get it. You believe in magic. Evolution can be observed and is understood. Now reality may bother you. I can appreciate that. The real world can be very scary at times. The question is: Can you get over your fears?