• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Appeals Court: Christian Logo for Lehigh County (PA) Doesn’t Promote Religion

Skwim

Veteran Member

"This is disappointing: An Appeals Court has ruled in favor of a Christian logo representing a Pennsylvania county, overturning an earlier ruling that said (fairly obviously) that the symbol was a promotion of religion.

The battle began in 2016 when the lawsuit was filed. A judge later declared that the official seal for Lehigh County illegally promoted Christianity due to the giant cross right in the center of it.



LehighSeal.png



While city commissioners were given weeks to provide any evidence in defense of the cross, they failed to do so, so the judge gave them 180 days to stop using it.

The Lehigh County Commissioners, however, chose to appeal the decision… and that’s partly because Judge Edward Smith gave such a wishy-washy ruling on the matter.

Smith admitted the “inclusion of the cross lacked a secular purpose” and that “a reasonable observer would perceive the seal as endorsing Christianity.” However, he also said in his ruling that he didn’t want to rule in favor of the Freedom From Religion Foundation because he knew the County wasn’t trying to promote Christianity. Just look at how he wrote about the matter:


Just as the Supreme Court has upheld legislative prayer as “simply a tolerable acknowledgment of beliefs widely held among the people of this country” rather than an establishment of religion… the passive government symbol at hand acknowledges the values shared by the citizens of Lehigh County at the time of its founding without establishing a compulsory, county-wide religion. Courts need not strip communities of all religious sentiment in order to ensure that no national, state, or local churches are established.

Such hostility towards religion creates “the very kind of religiously based divisiveness that the Establishment Clause seeks to avoid”… Seals and flags do not carry the force of law, and the citizens of Lehigh County need not fly the County Flag, or adhere to the values that it depicts. Just as the County’s citizens need not value education, agriculture, cement, or bison, they need not value Christianity. As long as citizens are free to practice any religion that resonates with them, or no religion at all, the fact that some might be offended by the Seal is an issue best addressed by


In short, as long as the county wasn’t forcing people to be Christian, then promoting Christianity shouldn’t be a big deal. It’s a weird kind of mental gymnastics that you would never see if we were talking about an Islamic or Satanic logo.

But the law required Smith to act like a “reasonable observer,” without knowledge of the county’s history. That hypothetical person would obviously see this as an establishment of religion. That’s why his decision was against the county, even if he ruled that way begrudgingly.

On appeal, the County’s attorneys argued that the giant cross in the seal was purely historical and had nothing whatsoever to do with promoting religion… even though there was “no documentation to connect it to that [historical] theme” according to FFRF attorneys.

Today, unfortunately, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the earlier ruling. Lehigh County will get to keep the Christian seal. And it’s all because of the recent Supreme Court ruling in the Bladensburg Peace Cross case. The judges said that, because the Giant Christian Cross in Maryland was deemed legal on account of its long history — Justice Samuel Alito said the memorial was clearly a Christian symbol, but the passage of time had diluted its religious meaning — the Lehigh County seal could remain unchanged for the same reasons.


The evidence does not show the sort of “discriminatory intent” in maintaining a symbol or “deliberate disrespect” in a design itself that American Legion suggested could overcome the presumption… So the seal is plainly constitutional under the most recent frameworks the Supreme Court has used to evaluate similar, established government symbols, monuments, and practices with religious elements.


The judges act like the only way a Christian cross on a government product can be illegal is if everyone in government gets together, holds hands, sings a hymn, and publicly announces how the symbol will honor the Son of God. Everything else gets a free pass."
source


Goes to show that just because you hav a law degree and were appointed a judgeship you're smarter than the average dolt walking the streets.

.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
"This is disappointing: An Appeals Court has ruled in favor of a Christian logo representing a Pennsylvania county, overturning an earlier ruling that said (fairly obviously) that the symbol was a promotion of religion.

The battle began in 2016 when the lawsuit was filed. A judge later declared that the official seal for Lehigh County illegally promoted Christianity due to the giant cross right in the center of it.


LehighSeal.png

While city commissioners were given weeks to provide any evidence in defense of the cross, they failed to do so, so the judge gave them 180 days to stop using it.

The Lehigh County Commissioners, however, chose to appeal the decision… and that’s partly because Judge Edward Smith gave such a wishy-washy ruling on the matter.

Smith admitted the “inclusion of the cross lacked a secular purpose” and that “a reasonable observer would perceive the seal as endorsing Christianity.” However, he also said in his ruling that he didn’t want to rule in favor of the Freedom From Religion Foundation because he knew the County wasn’t trying to promote Christianity. Just look at how he wrote about the matter:


Just as the Supreme Court has upheld legislative prayer as “simply a tolerable acknowledgment of beliefs widely held among the people of this country” rather than an establishment of religion… the passive government symbol at hand acknowledges the values shared by the citizens of Lehigh County at the time of its founding without establishing a compulsory, county-wide religion. Courts need not strip communities of all religious sentiment in order to ensure that no national, state, or local churches are established.

Such hostility towards religion creates “the very kind of religiously based divisiveness that the Establishment Clause seeks to avoid”… Seals and flags do not carry the force of law, and the citizens of Lehigh County need not fly the County Flag, or adhere to the values that it depicts. Just as the County’s citizens need not value education, agriculture, cement, or bison, they need not value Christianity. As long as citizens are free to practice any religion that resonates with them, or no religion at all, the fact that some might be offended by the Seal is an issue best addressed by
In short, as long as the county wasn’t forcing people to be Christian, then promoting Christianity shouldn’t be a big deal. It’s a weird kind of mental gymnastics that you would never see if we were talking about an Islamic or Satanic logo.

But the law required Smith to act like a “reasonable observer,” without knowledge of the county’s history. That hypothetical person would obviously see this as an establishment of religion. That’s why his decision was against the county, even if he ruled that way begrudgingly.

On appeal, the County’s attorneys argued that the giant cross in the seal was purely historical and had nothing whatsoever to do with promoting religion… even though there was “no documentation to connect it to that [historical] theme” according to FFRF attorneys.

Today, unfortunately, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the earlier ruling. Lehigh County will get to keep the Christian seal. And it’s all because of the recent Supreme Court ruling in the Bladensburg Peace Cross case. The judges said that, because the Giant Christian Cross in Maryland was deemed legal on account of its long history — Justice Samuel Alito said the memorial was clearly a Christian symbol, but the passage of time had diluted its religious meaning — the Lehigh County seal could remain unchanged for the same reasons.


The evidence does not show the sort of “discriminatory intent” in maintaining a symbol or “deliberate disrespect” in a design itself that American Legion suggested could overcome the presumption… So the seal is plainly constitutional under the most recent frameworks the Supreme Court has used to evaluate similar, established government symbols, monuments, and practices with religious elements.
The judges act like the only way a Christian cross on a government product can be illegal is if everyone in government gets together, holds hands, sings a hymn, and publicly announces how the symbol will honor the Son of God. Everything else gets a free pass."
source

Goes to show that just because you hav a law degree and were appointed a judgeship you're smarter than the average dolt walking the streets.

.
Great ruling...



Constitution of Pennsylvania...

PREAMBLE


WE, the people of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of civil and religious liberty, and humbly invoking His guidance, do ordain and establish this Constitution.



ARTICLE I

DECLARATION OF RIGHTS



Sec.

1. Inherent rights of mankind.

2. Political powers.

3. Religious freedom.

4. Religion.

§ 3. Religious freedom.

All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences; no man can of right be compelled to attend, erect or support any place of worship, or to maintain any ministry against his consent; no human authority can, in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience, and no preference shall ever be given by law to any religious establishments or modes of worship.

No one was violating the State's Constitution.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Great ruling...



Constitution of Pennsylvania...

PREAMBLE


WE, the people of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of civil and religious liberty, and humbly invoking His guidance, do ordain and establish this Constitution.



ARTICLE I

DECLARATION OF RIGHTS



Sec.

1. Inherent rights of mankind.

2. Political powers.

3. Religious freedom.

4. Religion.

§ 3. Religious freedom.

All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences; no man can of right be compelled to attend, erect or support any place of worship, or to maintain any ministry against his consent; no human authority can, in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience, and no preference shall ever be given by law to any religious establishments or modes of worship.

No one was violating the State's Constitution.
The federal Constitution's 1st Amendment, the Incorporation
Doctrine, & Supremacy Clause are the ultimate law of the
land regarding establishment of religion. "Establishment
Lite" will eventually be swept into the dustbin of history.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
The only saving grace I can see is that technically the cross is used in so many different religions in some form that on very shaky ground it's not promoting anything specific.
But that's why it's better and best to just not have any of it, and keep things simple.
 
Top