IndigoChild5559
Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
the messiah has not come "the first time" or "this time." We are still awaiting him.they did not recognize him the first time he came .whats the difference this time ?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
the messiah has not come "the first time" or "this time." We are still awaiting him.they did not recognize him the first time he came .whats the difference this time ?
yeah .....go with thatthe messiah has not come "the first time" or "this time." We are still awaiting him.
this messiah you have hope in ,where does he come from ? he is evidently a man . right ?the messiah has not come "the first time" or "this time." We are still awaiting him.
The gospels were written decades later, after oral traditions had evolved.
The question is "How are the dead raised up? and with what body do they come?"1Cor 15:36You fool! What you sow does not come to life unless it dies. 37And what you sow is not the body that will be, but just a seed, perhaps of wheat or something else.
According to these verses, what is sown is the dead body of the person.
1Cor 15:42 So is it with the resurrection of the dead. What is sown is perishable; what is raised is imperishable. it is raised in glory. It is sown in weakness; it is raised in power. 44 It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body.
The passage goes on to continue to speak about the body that is buries, the seed that is sown.
It is this seed that is changed into a spiritual body with power and glory.
I would say that you are trying to read the JW doctrine into the text and trying to end up with no physical in the resurrected body at all, just a spirit.
You put verse 37 in big letters and underlined etc but don't realise that the verse is speaking about the body that is sown. You make a big deal about verse 37 saying that what is sown is NOT the body that will be but do not seem to realise that I agree with that. It is not the body that will be because it is changed to a body with different qualities.
It does not say that it is swapped over for another body, it says the seed (dead body) is given glory and power. In this way it is not the body that was sown.
Jesus immortal and powerful spiritual body of His resurrection was also physical, and the blood (life of the body) was given for our ransom, Jesus could say in Luke 24 that He is "flesh and bone" (not flesh and blood).
The passage is speaking about the dead body (seed that is sown) all the way through and does not start talking about the "dead person" as you have in your version of 1Cor 15:35-44
Read 1Cor 15:37 and realise that the dead body is the seed which is sown and which is transformed into the same type of body that Jesus had after His resurrection. The body that He had all through the post resurrection stories and the body the disciples saw Him ascend to heaven with.
This would be why Daniel 7:13,14 says that He is "one like a son of man". But of course He was immortal and powerful and imperishable.
Yes he is an ordinary man born the ordinary way, human and flawed.this messiah you have hope in ,where does he come from ? he is evidently a man . right ?
Let me ask you a question, please. I'm guessing you do not believe the gospel accounts about Jesus, would you say that is true?the messiah has not come "the first time" or "this time." We are still awaiting him.
That is correct. I think a historical Jesus existed, but the gospel accounts combine history with myth and legend, often attributing to Jesus things he did not say or do.Let me ask you a question, please. I'm guessing you do not believe the gospel accounts about Jesus, would you say that is true?
OK, maybe we can talk about this later -- it's getting late -- eyes are getting sleepy. Must "lie down." And I hope to get up tomorrow a bit refreshed. Take care.That is correct. I think a historical Jesus existed, but the gospel accounts combine history with myth and legend, often attributing to Jesus things he did not say or do.
The question is "How are the dead raised up? and with what body do they come?"
The focus (subject) is not the dead body, but the dead (person).... and their being raised.
Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die:
What dies? The body, or the person?
It is sown a natural body. It is raised a spiritual body.
What is sown? Not the body, but the person. The person dies - is sown a natural body. Yes, they die [in] a natural body. They are quickened (raised) [in] a spiritual body.
The focus (subject) is the person, and their being raised.
My insertion are to simplify the reading, for you.
I know why this is hard for you to accept - not understand, because I think you are able to understand... if you wanted to, but understanding is not your interest here.
Holding your belief is.
Here again.
What is it in verses 42-44?
Tell me again... the body, right?
Let's read it.
42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption:
Continue...
You do know how to read Brian. No question. You did Comprehension and Grammar at school, I hope.
"It" refers to what? What's the subject Paul alludes to? The dead. Yes.
Thus, we read...
42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. the dead [person] is sown in corruption; the dead [person] is raised in incorruption:
43 The dead [person] is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; the dead [person] is raised in power:
44 The dead [person] is sown a natural body; the dead [person] is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.
Why we are having the problem Brian, is because you are saying the dead body is raised, and changed, which is not the same thing I , nor Paul, is saying.As you point out, the 2 questions are actually one question. The answer given by Paul does not tell us "how" someone is raised from the dead but it tells us what sort of body they will have.
"It is sown a natural body. It is raised a spiritual body." That is speaking of the the natural body which is buried. I know you can see that.
Even if you say, as you did ""The person dies--is sown a natural body. Yes, they die [in]a natural body. They are quickened (raised) [in] a spiritual body"" it means the say thing, and is speaking about the sort of body a person has now compared to the sort of body they will have at the resurrection.
Since I can agree with what you write, why do we have the problems we are having.
It seems that you are thinking that a "spiritual" body is a spirit. But when we look at the uses of the word "spiritual" in the New Testament we can see that it does not mean "spirit".
Yes I can agree that it is speaking about the dead person. And it is answering the question about the sort of body the dead person has when resurrected.
Do we agree then about what the passage is saying. We should if I can agree with what you are saying. So tell me if can agree why do we disagree? Make it simple, I find things hard to understand.
Do you want to discuss the meaning of "spiritual"?
Do you want to discuss verses 50 to 54.
1Cor 15:50 I declare to you, brothers and sisters, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. 51 Listen, I tell you a mystery: We will not all sleep, but we will all be changed— 52 in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. 53 For the perishable must clothe itself with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality. 54 When the perishable has been clothed with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality, then the saying that is written will come true: “Death has been swallowed up in victory.”
Instead of waffling about in things we probably agree on we should probably get to the things we don't agree on.
with such a description are you that long awaited messiah ?Yes he is an ordinary man born the ordinary way, human and flawed.
No, this ordinary man must also fulfill every last one of the messianic prophecies. I don't. In fact, no one in history has yet.with such a description are you that long awaited messiah ?
i assume that you have read some if not all that is written about Jesus. which of the messianic prophecies did Jesus not fulfill ?No, this ordinary man must also fulfill every last one of the messianic prophecies. I don't. In fact, no one in history has yet.
Here's just a sampling:i assume that you have read some if not all that is written about Jesus. which of the messianic prophecies did Jesus not fulfill ?
I like the kjv better.Because it looks like Jesus was alive in spirit form when he died.While the Jehovah's Witness doesn't.But that is just me.Also it's because I am Methodist.
perhaps you can show the scriptures that you allude to pleaseHere's just a sampling:
1. The messiah will usher in an era of worldwide peace between the nations. Jesus didn't.
2. The messiah will bring all Jews back to the land of Israel. Jesus didn't.
3. The messiah will rule from Jerusalem. Jesus didn't.
Let's focus in on one of the three so that the post doesn't get too long.perhaps you can show the scriptures that you allude to please