-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why did God create homosexuality?
- Thread starter Howlstan
- Start date
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Back to the topic of straight anal sex. As my previous link showed it is far more prevalent than most people realize. One group that employs this tactic are young Christian girls that wish to remain "virgin". They will have anal sex before they have vaginal sex. Here is just one article on it:
The Christian Teens Exploiting ‘God’s Loophole’ to Keep their Virginity, Exorcising an Ex and the…
As you can see it is called "God's loophole". Or if you want it explained to you this is quite enjoyable:
EDIT: If both of these young women look familiar to you there is a good reason for that. They both had a short series of repeating roles on The Big Bang Theory.
The Christian Teens Exploiting ‘God’s Loophole’ to Keep their Virginity, Exorcising an Ex and the…
As you can see it is called "God's loophole". Or if you want it explained to you this is quite enjoyable:
EDIT: If both of these young women look familiar to you there is a good reason for that. They both had a short series of repeating roles on The Big Bang Theory.
Last edited:
Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
Oh my goodness. This should be in Spoiler. Just sayin'
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I will put it in one. It is a fun tune.
EDIT: Done. I had to edit it three times. The first to put in the spoiler warning. The second to change the right end bracket from upper case to lower case. And the third time to change the right starting bracket from upper case to lower case.
Truthseeker
Non-debating member when I can help myself
This conversation is over.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Do you need me to quote you?
Seriously you cannot just say "God says it is bad". That is not good enough. If you do that you put a huge burden of proof upon yourself to show that your version of God is correct.
When you judge others you will also be judged based upon those actions. I say, if no one is harm is being done why oppose it? We are both older people. We were brought up in a rather homophobic time. One needs get past that indoctrination. It took me a while, but I finally saw the light. I am proud to say that by the time that marriage equality came on the ballot in my state I understood the moral way to vote.
Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
Ha. You sound like me with All my posts. The first time I check it is fine. The second time I see a word off and after three people reply I look back and its all off.
I should tell people to wait five minutes before replying.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Worse yet is being a victim of Muphry's Law. And yes, that spelling is correct.
Muphry's Law is a variant of Murphy's Law. It essentially says that if you ever correct the grammar or spelling of someone on the internet that your post will have grammatical or spelling errors in it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry's_law
rational experiences
Veteran Member
Rational humAn advice human men were never from hell.
Satan as hell was a man's review of a sun as an earth God scient ist the ist.
Changed his title to scient ist actually.
A satanist claim said a n a l intercourse gave him the power
Is a conscious man's proof that he caused that conscious belief himself as a nuclear scientist.
Whose science natural claim said men and women in natural God beginnings were equally paired mutual.
He applied radiation science caused the sin of man.
Radiation fall out burning gases fell as science never owned any light constant.
The womb void vacuum did.
He told you as a man theist scientist that he ignored his own gods man science of the earth nature advice.
And theoried to oppose it.
Hence his conscious nature changed because of it.
Was just scientific human teaching. Causes
Satan as hell was a man's review of a sun as an earth God scient ist the ist.
Changed his title to scient ist actually.
A satanist claim said a n a l intercourse gave him the power
Is a conscious man's proof that he caused that conscious belief himself as a nuclear scientist.
Whose science natural claim said men and women in natural God beginnings were equally paired mutual.
He applied radiation science caused the sin of man.
Radiation fall out burning gases fell as science never owned any light constant.
The womb void vacuum did.
He told you as a man theist scientist that he ignored his own gods man science of the earth nature advice.
And theoried to oppose it.
Hence his conscious nature changed because of it.
Was just scientific human teaching. Causes
So, if they are not born like that, what else led them to homosexuality?
I am heterosexual, but if I had been able to control that, I would have gone for bisexuality, since it would have vastly enlarged my relationship market. Alas, I cannot imagine how I could have had control on that.
Ciao
- viole
Trailblazer
Veteran Member
I would have ended it before it started because I know I would say something that would offend some people since I have very strong feelings on the subject of sex, not homosexuality.
Trailblazer
Veteran Member
It is good enough for those of us who believe in God and God's Laws.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
He messed up when he tried to claim that homosexuals were immoral:
Why did God create homosexuality?
His outrage is false. I gave him several chances to support his claim.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Then you should follow those laws. Do not expect others to. I do not expect you to follow Buddhist or Hindu laws. That would be insane. Once again, because people did not follow his particular version of "God's Laws" (and that claim alone requires massive evidence that no one on your side can seem to find) does not make them immoral.
It might be immoral for him. That does not mean that it is immoral for others. Once you make a claim about someone else being immoral one can easily be challenged and it is put up or shut up tome.
Trailblazer
Veteran Member
Hmmmmmm... I did not see the word immoral in his post. Can you find it and post it?
Trailblazer
Veteran Member
Baha'is do not expect anyone except Baha'is to follow Baha'i Laws.
Trailblazer
Veteran Member
I did not see him claim that. Can you quote him claiming that?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
He more than strongly implied that:
Why would homosexuality be a "test"? Once again, context matters.
And here he does it again. If it is not victimless who are the victims? How are they victims? He was making disparaging remarks about others far worse than anything that I said about him.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Uh huh so you say. But that is not how they act at times.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Wow I am sorry but your personal prejudices have made your reading comprehension rather poor. There is no need to "quote" his posts tell us that he does not approve of homosexuality. Therefore for him to be involved in such acts would be immoral. Why is that so hard to understand. But immoral for one person is not necessarily immoral for another.