I take that to mean that for certain text you are not infallible.You will have to be more specific, what is the text and subject are you referring to?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I take that to mean that for certain text you are not infallible.You will have to be more specific, what is the text and subject are you referring to?
It’s the way it is for me, didn’t ask for your opinion about my life and experience with God cause you haven’t a clue about such things. However I did ask you what specific proof you were looking for?
It’s the way it is for me, didn’t ask for your opinion about my life and experience with God cause you haven’t a clue about such things. However I did ask you what specific proof you were looking for?
You say there is no evidence for God and I told you what I found, that when I called out to God, He answered me and delivered me, has provided for our family as I have daily trusted Him. He has been faithful to us for 30 years and this is true and honest. It’s my experience and many others as well. Now I’m sorry that this hasn’t happened for you. I already told you many times. Wasn’t asking you for any kind advice.That is not the way that it works. The burden of proof is always on the claimant. The tests that they come.up with are also partly a test of their own honesty.
And please do not try to use "God says" BS. You cannot claim that until you make your case. Besides that you do not understand that verse because you do not understand its purpose or why it is there. In fact if the Bible were the Word of God such verses would not be necessary. That sort of verse is a defensive verse and is actually evidence that the Bible is not the word of god.
You’ll have to share the text, don’t know which you’re referring to. Most of the Bible interprets itself, other verses need more study to understand what God was communicating.I take that to mean that for certain text you are not infallible.
Hasn’t failed me only confirmed that God is faithful.The problem with your test is that it fails. It fails because any religion can have the same sort of success. It is not evidence of anything and only tells us that you do not know, you only believe.
There is no reliable evidence for God. What you claim as evidence is the same thing that a Muslim claims as evidence for Allah.You say there is no evidence for God and I told you what I found, that when I called out to God, He answered me and delivered me, has provided for our family as I have daily trusted Him. He has been faithful to us for 30 years and this is true and honest. It’s my experience and many others as well. Now I’m sorry that this hasn’t happened for you. I already told you many times. Wasn’t asking you for any kind advise
Yes, that is called Confirmation Bias. It is not very impressive.Hasn’t failed me only confirmed that God is faithful.
Everyone has a testimony, I’m sharing my own personal experience and it’s proof for me beyond a shadow of a doubt. You have your views, your own testimony.There is no reliable evidence for God. What you claim as evidence is the same thing that a Muslim claims as evidence for Allah.
To have reliable evidence you need a proper test. What you call evidence is not reliable at all.
You do not understand what a proper proof is. And you have a huge amount of doubt. Your fear of learning tells us so.Everyone has a testimony, I’m sharing my own personal experience and it’s proof for me beyond a shadow of a doubt. You have your views, your own testimony.
What’s the proper test? Explain itYes, that is called Confirmation Bias. It is not very impressive.
The weak in faith need weak tests. Their faith cannot stand up to a proper test that could possibly refute their beliefs.
I am not referring to any specific text. I have nothing specific in mind.You’ll have to share the text, don’t know which you’re referring to. Most of the Bible interprets itself, other verses need more study to understand what God was communicating.
You do not understand what a proper proof is. And you have a huge amount of doubt. Your fear of learning tells us so.[/QUOTE
I’ve learned a lot, some people don’t have a clue what they’re looking for.
There is no "the" test. And I have already explained the key factor of it. A proper test must have a reasonable chance that one will fail and one must honestly acknowledge the failure if it occurs.What’s the proper test? Explain it
OkI am not referring to any specific text. I have nothing specific in mind.
Perhaps we have a different interpretation of the word “infallible” itself.
if your interpretation of the Bible is infallible, it is infallible for 100 percent of it, every verse, every topic, every jot and jittle.
So is your interpretation of the Bible infallible?
If you don’t want to answer, that is fine, but it is a simple question.
I’ve learned a lot, some people don’t have a clue what they’re looking for.
Ok great, the test was a success! I’m no longer a drug addict and alcoholic, God has completely changed my heart and mind and has given me His Spirit as proof. I have a clear conscience and totally different appetite and desires that came from Him. That’s my own proof. I tried other things before that and nothing worked, When I received Jesus Christ as my Savior and Lord, I was changed that day and that was undeniable to me and those around me that have known me all my life.There is no "the" test. And I have already explained the key factor of it. A proper test must have a reasonable chance that one will fail and one must honestly acknowledge the failure if it occurs.
In the beginning, God’s plan
“Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.”
Genesis 2:24 NKJV
After man rebelled and sinned, they brought death, curse, war, which is what you’re referencing in your verses is the result of man’s evil heart apart from God.
Then Jesus comes and says the same thing among other things which are too many to post but you can read yourself:
“The Pharisees also came to Him, testing Him, and saying to Him, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for just any reason?” And He answered and said to them, “Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So then, they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate.” They said to Him, “Why then did Moses command to give a certificate of divorce, and to put her away?” He said to them, “Moses, because of the hardness of your hearts, permitted you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so.”
Matthew 19:3-8 NKJV
Please quote one thing Jesus said and then provide evidence for your claim.
He did a great job, everyone will see and understand everything in the end.Your supposedly eternal, omniscient God had all of eternity to consider how He would create man. He precisely built Adam & Eve to His exacting specifications. Being omniscient, He knew, from the beginning of eternity, that A&E would disobey Him. You consider this disobedience the reason God brought death, curse, and war.
Why do you ignore that your God knew they would disobey Him?
Why do you ignore that your God planned for them to disobey Him?
Wasn’t concerned about that part, only God’s view on sex and marriage according to Scripture.I asked you:
I highlighted part of my request in red this time.
All you could do was cut and paste a verse from the Bible.
You provided no evidence. Do you have any?
For example, how does "Matthew" know the conversation between the Pharisees and Jesus? What evidence can you produce to substantiate that he was there?