And ego is driven by insecurity. So deep inside, but very hidden, is the realisation that your faith makes little sense, so a constant barrage of affirming that it does overcomes that?"We" don't.
But for those that do...ego.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And ego is driven by insecurity. So deep inside, but very hidden, is the realisation that your faith makes little sense, so a constant barrage of affirming that it does overcomes that?"We" don't.
But for those that do...ego.
And which 'one' would that be?I don't see any value in defining yourself along lines of faith or religion. There is really only one (spiritual) path and not many. Those who fight over faith or religion do not yet realize this (enough).
1) Teachers brainwashing others with "My way is the highway"Why do we humans fight over faith and belief?
Why do we humans fight over faith and belief? Yes, there are many Religions who tell the slightly different ways of understanding the truth of our existence. But it seems to me that because we have different religions we can not be happy for others who see the truth differently the what we do.
What if we instead started to work together to find common ground in our belief and where we "disagree" we would say ok that is no problem.
And even within the same religious teachings we often see "fights" of who is right or wrong.
May the answer be as simple that we are all on different wisdom level of the spiritual teachings? So even we all see some part of the truth, none of us actually see the full truth, and this makes us protective of our own belief and faith?
Maybe we have come to a point where we start listening to others and stop being so "obsessed" with "MY BELIEF IS THE ONLY TRUTH AND YOU ARE WRONG"
I find the truth within all spiritual teachings, but I chose to follow Buddha Sakyamuni, That does not mean other teachings are wrong.
Yes I am agree with you (again ) And actually the energy that can be felt in the different houses of worship is amazing where prayer meditation or chanting is done, energy build-up and can be used to get even deeper in to the prayer meditation or chantBeautiful thoughts Amanaki. I think it’s very important in this age for us all to reach out to each other and abandon our prejudices. I’d like to think we can visit each other’s place of worship such as the church, mosque, synagogue, temples and pagodas and mix in a spirit of friendliness and fellowship.
I’ve prayed and meditated at all these places and found them to each have a unique beauty like that of the different coloured flowers in a garden. I follow Buddha too but also Jesus, Muhammad, Moses, Krishna, the Bab and Baha’u’llah. I believe They all teach truth and virtue. It is very possible to accept them all as They all teach spiritual truths.
We can learn from all religions and be as one human family. This is what the Buddha wished, this is what all the Messengers and Prophets desired most - that we live in peace and harmony as one human family.
1) Teachers brainwashing others with "My way is the highway"
2) Bookish knowledge instead of real knowledge
3) Arrogance instead of humbleness
4) Ego first, Love last
5) Direspect and belittling creates hate
My personal problem is with people who say they know things they cannot possibly know. And when many of these people I have this problem with go on to claim that they CAN possibly know these things, and then I ask them for the justification, it has always been something completely insufficient and lacking proper evidence for the confidence with which they put it forward. And then, when I call them on this, they accuse me of being biased to the point of being unable to accept their evidence "just because."Why do we humans fight over faith and belief? Yes, there are many Religions who tell the slightly different ways of understanding the truth of our existence. But it seems to me that because we have different religions we can not be happy for others who see the truth differently the what we do.
What if we instead started to work together to find common ground in our belief and where we "disagree" we would say ok that is no problem.
And even within the same religious teachings we often see "fights" of who is right or wrong.
May the answer be as simple that we are all on different wisdom level of the spiritual teachings? So even we all see some part of the truth, none of us actually see the full truth, and this makes us protective of our own belief and faith?
Maybe we have come to a point where we start listening to others and stop being so "obsessed" with "MY BELIEF IS THE ONLY TRUTH AND YOU ARE WRONG"
I find the truth within all spiritual teachings, but I chose to follow Buddha Sakyamuni, That does not mean other teachings are wrong.
Maybe evolution is not so far away from the ruth, even for those who follow a spiritual path.My personal problem is with people who say they know things they cannot possibly know. And when many of these people I have this problem with go on to claim that they CAN possibly know these things, and then I ask them for the justification, it has always been something completely insufficient and lacking proper evidence for the confidence with which they put it forward. And then, when I call them on this, they accuse me of being biased to the point of being unable to accept their evidence "just because."
Do they seriously think that I accepted something like "evolution" right out of the gate, with no evidence or convincing of myself being needed? Perhaps they do - but they would be mistaken. The evidence for evolution is, instead, so compelling that I found that I would be reticent in my desire to remain knowledgeable and accepting of reality if I were to choose to try not to accept it. It is completely unlike any religious claim in astoundingly fundamental ways. Religious claims have nothing on things like evolution, theory of gravity, etc. There is no comparison. Which is partly why there will always be a battle if there are people believing in things for which they have insufficient evidential support. Always.
The path within to get to know or realize the ultimate 'self' or 'I-feeling'.And which 'one' would that be?
So the folks who think that going within is 'of the devil' are excluded?The path within to get to know or realize the ultimate 'self' or 'I-feeling'.
Why do we humans fight over faith and belief? Yes, there are many Religions who tell the slightly different ways of understanding the truth of our existence. But it seems to me that because we have different religions we can not be happy for others who see the truth differently the what we do.
What if we instead started to work together to find common ground in our belief and where we "disagree" we would say ok that is no problem.
And even within the same religious teachings we often see "fights" of who is right or wrong.
May the answer be as simple that we are all on different wisdom level of the spiritual teachings? So even we all see some part of the truth, none of us actually see the full truth, and this makes us protective of our own belief and faith?
Maybe we have come to a point where we start listening to others and stop being so "obsessed" with "MY BELIEF IS THE ONLY TRUTH AND YOU ARE WRONG"
I find the truth within all spiritual teachings, but I chose to follow Buddha Sakyamuni, That does not mean other teachings are wrong.
Why do we humans fight over faith and belief? Yes, there are many Religions who tell the slightly different ways of understanding the truth of our existence.
But it seems to me that because we have different religions we can not be happy for others who see the truth differently the what we do.
What if we instead started to work together to find common ground in our belief and where we "disagree" we would say ok that is no problem.
And even within the same religious teachings we often see "fights" of who is right or wrong.
May the answer be as simple that we are all on different wisdom level of the spiritual teachings? So even we all see some part of the truth, none of us actually see the full truth, and this makes us protective of our own belief and faith?
Maybe we have come to a point where we start listening to others and stop being so "obsessed" with "MY BELIEF IS THE ONLY TRUTH AND YOU ARE WRONG"
I find the truth within all spiritual teachings, but I chose to follow Buddha Sakyamuni, That does not mean other teachings are wrong.
What if we instead started to work together to find common ground in our belief and where we "disagree" we would say ok that is no problem.
Why do we humans fight over faith and belief? Yes, there are many Religions who tell the slightly different ways of understanding the truth of our existence. But it seems to me that because we have different religions we can not be happy for others who see the truth differently the what we do.
What if we instead started to work together to find common ground in our belief and where we "disagree" we would say ok that is no problem.
And even within the same religious teachings we often see "fights" of who is right or wrong.
May the answer be as simple that we are all on different wisdom level of the spiritual teachings? So even we all see some part of the truth, none of us actually see the full truth, and this makes us protective of our own belief and faith?
Maybe we have come to a point where we start listening to others and stop being so "obsessed" with "MY BELIEF IS THE ONLY TRUTH AND YOU ARE WRONG"
I find the truth within all spiritual teachings, but I chose to follow Buddha Sakyamuni, That does not mean other teachings are wrong.
IMO:Most of us dont understand how science and religion have different goals and means and that such comparisons can be irrelevant.
Thank you for a very good answerAnd fairly often the differences are not quite so small. There are many creeds thriving around the world that teach a lot of dangerous and disrespectful behaviors in no uncertain terms.
Truth be told, quite a few of them could not strive harder to avoid understanding the truth of our existence if they wanted to. For many, lies and delusions are indeed the name of the game, although they will never admit that in quite those words.
Amanaki, I think that we should not underestimate the challenges that come directly with differences of opinion among people that have to coexist or cooperate for any reason - and in these days of effective and fairly widespread transports and communications, those people are potentially many more than they were just a few decades ago.
It is fairly easy to be happy for people that we feel disconnected from. It is considerably harder to feel happy for people who regularly enter our field of perception. All the more so when they interact regularly with us directly. And it can be an intense, passionate and lifelong challenge to deal with differences of opinion with people who we are tied to in deep links.
We see that in politics even more than in religion. Having conflicting views of what would be best for our communities is no small source of sorrow.
To an extent that is unavoidable. We all exist in the same world and there are only so many diverse goals and strategies that can be reconciled with each other. When we can't reach agreements, we end up in conflict. That is just how it goes.
The true solution, such as it is, would be to exert discernment and encourage its development in ourselves and others, developing more ambitious solutions when our challenges outgrow more traditional ways of dealing with difficulties.
But even that can only go so far. At some point communities end up collapsing under their own weight, simply because their means simply can not sustain their goals anymore.
Being a part of such a collapse while feeling unfairly neglected in any way can be very stressful indeed, and lead people towards destructive behavior and destructive beliefs.
That is why we all have a responsibility over the health of our own actions, as well as that of our beliefs.
That is certainly a worthy goal and a state of being to be maintainted once reached.
It is also, alas, a fairly rare one. Our personal comfort is only very rarely quite that independent from the cooperation of others.
Not to be subtle, quite a few of us are in fact sick in various ways that originate and/or reflect on our beliefs and our behavior.
It is not a simple matter of being at different levels of wisdom and lacking enough mutual understanding. There are deeper, more difficult challenges for us to deal with.
That attitude is the mark of one of those ill states of being, IMO.
I take it that you disagree with me then, when I say that there is definitely such a thing as a misguided teaching.
If you make a problem out it, it will become a problem yes. I don't try to make a problem, i hope to get as many to follow religion as possible, and no it does not need to be the one i follow my self.You mean like working together to condemn gay people and agreeing it is okay?
Or like agreeing kids should be taught creationism and religious texts in school instead of science and math?
Do you see where maybe what you would consider something being no problem is always going to be a problem ?
So atheists don't count?If you make a problem out it, it will become a problem yes. I don't try to make a problem, i hope to get as many to follow religion as possible, and no it does not need to be the one i follow my self.
What do you mean? I can't change their none belief to belief I think, and if they don't want to believe that is ok to meSo atheists don't count?
You said you hoped to get them to follow religion. That indicated to me that it wasn't okay to you if they didn't. I guess I misunderstood.What do you mean? I can't change their none belief to belief I think, and if they don't want to believe that is ok to me