• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

My current version of Hinduism

Shantanu

Well-Known Member
There is no end to claims of being messengersw in Abrahamic religions. Even during the life-time of Bahaullah, one was born in India - Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, He said he was the returning Jesus, the Mahdi. There are scores of others.
So the Bahai Faith is an Abrahamic religion? I think they will dispute that.
 

ajay0

Well-Known Member
Hi. See this post. (my previous post)

It is an incorrect observation on his part that Bahaullah is mentioned in the Gita. Perhaps he had meant through the phenomenon of the Avatar ( appearing in certain time periods of criticality), that Bahaullah can be perceived as an avatar or messiah in present times.

Or you may have wrongly understood this. It would be great if you can provide a reference to this saying of Shogi Effendi so as to understand the context correctly.
 
Last edited:

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
Modi got some 350 million votes, Congress got 120 million votes. So, at present Modi voters are in a majority. The reaction will vary from one person to another, but yes, with some people it could be physical or even worse. We have some very rough areas.
That's sad. I wish it were more like sports events, where they battle it out on the ground, enjoy the competition, and then afterwards, everyone shakes hands until the next game. I don't see how disagreeing can't be civil.

As you may recall, I left this forum for a year, at one time. The reason was because a few people were getting upset at my words, mostly representing traditional Hinduism. A few people did leave, accusing me (and others) on the way out. So I figured (irrationally) that it would be better for me to leave, and then they would have stayed, having more views here.

But over that year, I thought about it, meditated on it, and realised that all I was doing was expressing my own POV. (In a civil manner at that, as I never get mod warnings, I follow the forum rules fairly well.) Surely on this planet we all have the right to express our POV. If others get angry, that isn't really my problem, it's theirs. So I came back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim

atanu

Member
Premium Member
Then why do you, a Baha'i, start a thread entitled, 'My version of Hinduism'? and then explain how Baha'ullah is part of Hinduism? If that isn't an attempt at syncreticism, then just what the heck is it? Actions speak louder than words.

Allow me please. Probably @Jim or his sources do not mean that Bahá’u’lláh is part of Hinduism.

If one truly accepts God, one will accept that God is unlimited and comprise all space-time-beings. That is what AUM is, Shiva is, Krishna is. The difference in names is just like ‘South face of Himalayas’ and ‘North face of Himalayas’. Differences are in our views.

This is the teaching of Shri Ramakrishna, Shri Ramana, Shri Chinmayananda et al. But this is probably not the view of most Christians, most Muslims and most Jews.

To me it is actually heartening to see this strand of universalism in the Bahá’ís.

But of course the kind of proselytism we saw in the paper cited by you may be a hidden factor running as common narrative in Bahá’í religion. Or it may be an isolated opinion of a smart-*** academician. I truly do not know.

But, I have reasons to believe that @adrian009, @Jim and others have wholesome thoughts.

YMMV.
 

atanu

Member
Premium Member
Or you may have wrongly understood this. It would be great if you can provide a reference to this saying of Shogi Effendi so as to understand the context correctly.

Yes. We must see the actual context. It will also clear up whether there is any proselytism angle or not.

I found discussions on the subject here:
Baha'u'llah and the Return of Krishna

I think the problem pertains to Bahá’í use of a non Sruti element of Hinduism and extrapolating upon that.
 
Last edited:

Jim

Nets of Wonder
@ajay0 @atanu

Bahá'í Reference Library - God Passes By, Pages 89-103

About halfway down the page. This paragraph;
He alone is meant by the prophecy attributed to Gautama Buddha Himself, that “a Buddha named Maitreye, the Buddha of universal fellowship” should, in the fullness of time, arise and reveal “His boundless glory.” To Him the Bhagavad-Gita of the Hindus had referred as the “Most Great Spirit,” the “Tenth Avatar,” the “Immaculate Manifestation of Krishna.”
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Allow me please. Probably @Jim or his sources do not mean that Bahá’u’lláh is part of Hinduism.
No. That is not what Bahais say. They say that Hinduism is a part of Bahaiism and stands rejected, as the new message has been brought by Bahaullah.
That's sad. I wish it were more like sports events, where they battle it out on the ground, enjoy the competition, and then afterwards, everyone shakes hands until the next game.
That cannot be Vinayaka, since success in election in India means power to do what they want, and it involves millions and billions of Rupees in bribes and commissions. It is not a game of Rugby or Ice-hockey among friends.
 

Jim

Nets of Wonder
Bahai's need to spell out what they consider to be the essence of Hinduism ...
Views about that might diverge among Baha’is as widely as they do in all the rest of society. The only views that have any authority for most Baha’is are those of Baha’u’llah, Abdu’l-Baha and Shoghi Effendi. You can see what their views on Hinduism are by searching for “Hinduism” in the Bahai Reference Library and looking for results from those authors.
 

ajay0

Well-Known Member
@ajay0 @atanu

Bahá'í Reference Library - God Passes By, Pages 89-103

About halfway down the page. This paragraph;

He alone is meant by the prophecy attributed to Gautama Buddha Himself, that “a Buddha named Maitreye, the Buddha of universal fellowship” should, in the fullness of time, arise and reveal “His boundless glory.” To Him the Bhagavad-Gita of the Hindus had referred as the “Most Great Spirit,” the “Tenth Avatar,” the “Immaculate Manifestation of Krishna.”

Okay, it is now clear you have misunderstood it.

Shoghi Effendi simply got carried away by hero worship, that he, rightly or wrongly, addressed Bahaullah as Maitreya and the tenth avatar in Hinduism.

The bhagavad gita does talk about the phenomenon of the Avatar, but nothing related to Bahaullah specifically. Some scriptures does talk about the Kalki avatar in the Kali Yuga, who will be the tenth avatar.

Shoghi Effendi probably added Bahaullah as the tenth avatar out of enthusiasm and zeal in reference to the scriptuures that talk about the tenth Kalki avatar in the Kali Yuga or modern time period. This is all there is to it, though he technically erred in stating that the Bhagavad Gita stated thus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim

ajay0

Well-Known Member
There are monotheistic Dharmic religions like Sikhism, and monotheistic Hindu sects like the Prajapita Brahmakumaris, Lingayats, Brahmo Samajis, Arya Samajis which are similar to the monotheism of the Abrahamic religions, and have similar themes like the Bahais.

The Kabir Panthis, also a monotheistic sect in Hinduism with around 10 million adherents, also worship a single incorporeal God.

Where spring, the lord of seasons reigneth, there the unstruck music sounds of itself, There the streams of light flow in all directions, few are the men who can cross to that shore! There, where millions of Krishnas stand with hands folded, Where millions of Vishnus bow their heads, where millions of Brahmas are reading the Vedas, Where millions of Shivas are lost in contemplation, where millions of Indras dwell in the sky, Where the demi-gods and the munis are unnumbered, where millions of Saraswatis, goddess of music play the vina, There is my Lord self-revealed, and the scent of sandal and flowers dwells in those deeps.

— Kabir, II.57


There is nothing wrong in pointing out the similarities between the bahai religion and Dharmic monotheism, if the objective is to increase mutual understanding and cooperation and not merely to reinforce racial and religious prejudices as some misguided people had done in the past.

 

atanu

Member
Premium Member

Yeah. Found it.:)

To Israel He was neither more nor less than the incarnation of the “Everlasting Father,” the “Lord of Hosts” come down “with ten thousands of saints”; to Christendom Christ returned “in the glory of the Father,” to Shí’ah Islám the return of the Imám Husayn; to Sunní Islám the descent of the “Spirit of God” (Jesus Christ); to the Zoroastrians the promised Sháh-Bahrám; to the Hindus the reincarnation of Krishna; to the Buddhists the fifth Buddha.

So, IMO, it is not about Shri Krishna particularly. It is about a descent of God in form of Bahá'u'lláh. The author relates that to foretelling of such descent from various scriptures.

In the name He bore He combined those of the Imám Husayn, the most illustrious of the successors of the Apostle of God—the brightest “star” shining in the “crown” mentioned in the Revelation of St. John—and of the Imám ‘Alí, the Commander of the Faithful, the second of the two “witnesses” extolled in that same Book. He was formally designated Bahá’u’lláh, an appellation specifically recorded in the Persian Bayán, signifying at once the glory, the light and the splendor of God, and was styled the “Lord of Lords,” the “Most Great Name,” the “Ancient Beauty,” the “Pen of the Most High,” the “Hidden Name,” the “Preserved Treasure,” “He Whom God will make manifest,” the “Most Great Light,” the “All-Highest Horizon,” the “Most Great Ocean,” the “Supreme Heaven,” the “Pre-Existent Root,” the “Self-Subsistent,” the “Day-Star of the Universe,” the “Great Announcement,” the “Speaker on Sinai,” the “Sifter of Men,” the “Wronged One of the World,” the “Desire of the Nations,” the “Lord of the Covenant,” the “Tree beyond which there is no passing.”

To Him Isaiah, the greatest of the Jewish prophets, had alluded as the “Glory of the Lord,” the “Everlasting Father,” the “Prince of Peace,” the “Wonderful,” the “Counsellor,” the “Rod come forth out of the stem of Jesse” and the “Branch grown out of His roots,” Who “shall be established upon the throne of David,” Who “will come with strong hand,” Who “shall judge among the nations,” Who “shall smite the earth with the rod of His mouth, and with the breath of His lips slay the wicked,” and Who “shall assemble the 95 outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.” Of Him David had sung in his Psalms, acclaiming Him as the “Lord of Hosts” and the “King of Glory.” To Him Haggai had referred as the “Desire of all nations,” and Zachariah as the “Branch” Who “shall grow up out of His place,” and “shall build the Temple of the Lord.” Ezekiel had extolled Him as the “Lord” Who “shall be king over all the earth,” while to His day Joel and Zephaniah had both referred as the “day of Jehovah,” the latter describing it as “a day of wrath, a day of trouble and distress, a day of wasteness and desolation, a day of darkness and gloominess, a day of clouds and thick darkness, a day of the trumpet and alarm against the fenced cities, and against the high towers.” His Day Ezekiel and Daniel had, moreover, both acclaimed as the “day of the Lord,” and Malachi described as “the great and dreadful day of the Lord” when “the Sun of Righteousness” will “arise, with healing in His wings,” whilst Daniel had pronounced His advent as signalizing the end of the “abomination that maketh desolate.”
To His Dispensation the sacred books of the followers of Zoroaster had referred as that in which the sun must needs be brought to a standstill for no less than one whole month. To Him Zoroaster must have alluded when, according to tradition, He foretold that a period of three thousand years of conflict and contention must needs precede the advent of the World-Savior Sháh-Bahrám, Who would triumph over Ahriman and usher in an era of blessedness and peace.

It is also somewhat like the Sahasranama-s (thousand names) of deities prevalent in Hinduism.

He alone is meant by the prophecy attributed to Gautama Buddha Himself, that “a Buddha named Maitreye, the Buddha of universal fellowship” should, in the fullness of time, arise and reveal “His boundless glory.” To Him the Bhagavad-Gita of the Hindus had referred as the “Most Great Spirit,” the “Tenth Avatar,” the “Immaculate Manifestation of Krishna.”

There is a problem here. Gita has nothing for speculation. It is a scripture that is considered to be a summary of Upanishads and is nearly equal in value to them. Upanishads are considered Sruti - "that which is heard" and are considered to be infallible, being of divine origin. Shri Krishna mentions in Gita that God descends from time to time. But I do not know of prediction of a 10th avatar in Gita.

Those mythical aspects are the subject of Purana-s and 'avatar' is particular story of Bhagavat Purana - a Vaishnav scripture. Puranas are not Sruti. Although Puranas are also considered revelations, they cannot contradict Sruti.

So, I will say that Shoghi Effendi's writing cannot be considered revelation but is more of poetic praise. Everyone of us in essence is That. In a few the essence shines bright. Bahá'u'lláh might have been such. I do not know.
 

TransmutingSoul

Veteran Member
Premium Member
That is very disappointing news, as there is a lot of evil in the world today and we do not know how to tackle this source of injustice for the common man.

We takle it by changing our own self and when we have all the virtues, we become a light for others.

Thus each victory we have over self, to gain virtue, will assist others to find that light within their own self.

Regards Tony
 
Top