Well, no. That is just not even close to true, nor does it even have much of a clear meaning to begin with.
This does not make sense even grammatically.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Atheism is a RELIGION
- Thread starter Matheist
- Start date
Matheist
http://animist.net
They are responsible for what they said, they are not responsible for what you understand.
They said: Nature's God.
ALL MANKIND agree with this.
Matheist
http://animist.net
Could it be said that Atheism is UNCONSTITUTIONALIZED & ILLEGAL? The terrorist?
United States Declaration of Independence: "...When in the course of human events [ie. ALL GODS], it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God [ie. ALL GODS SAME GOD] entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation..."
The Declaration of Independence: Full text
United States Declaration of Independence: "...When in the course of human events [ie. ALL GODS], it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God [ie. ALL GODS SAME GOD] entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation..."
The Declaration of Independence: Full text
Last edited:
Sorry, you are simply not being truthful.
Of course it can be said.
All manners of unfair and absurd things are, in fact, said. This is just one further example.
Matheist
http://animist.net
That is "Argumentum ad lapidem is a logical fallacy that consists in dismissing a statement as absurd without giving proof of its absurdity."
Matheist
http://animist.net
It is with Constitutional Right and supported by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Atheism is ILLEGAL?
Nope. That is instead a pinch of basic awareness of the variety of religions coupled with a functional understanding of the burden of proof.
Matheist
http://animist.net
"Argumentum ad lapidem is a logical fallacy that consists in dismissing a statement as absurd without giving proof of its absurdity."
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
You have been given multiple proofs that your argument is absurd - you just keep ignoring them.
Matheist
http://animist.net
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
So you don't know what a straw man argument is either.
This makes makes no sense at all. I mean that literally - it just doesn't mean anything. Perhaps you slow down a bit and try to express it a little more coherently.
Matheist
http://animist.net
Even logical structure makes no sense to you. How can you even make an argument?
Deduction and Induction
Last edited:
Seems to me it describes just about every organized and un-organized religion.
Jesus was Not kidding when he said his followers (genuine and fake) would be hated - Matthew 10:22; 24:9
The ' showdown ' time of separating to take place on Earth is approaching as found at Matthew 25:31-33.
It won't be long before the ' powers that be ' will turn on Christendom ( fake 'weed/tares' Christians ).
I find there are people who put ' faith ' in oneself, so what a person puts first in one's life is their ' god '.
What is put first is their religious belief even if Not thought of in that category.
Yipes! How did you conclude I am Not allowed to think for myself
For someone to say they 'can't categorically say no gods exists' to me means an 'agnostic', not atheist.
My high school English teacher said she was an 'agnostic' because she was Not sure God exists.
She said that because one student asked if she was an atheist. (one who categorically states No God/god exists)
To me 'reality' is that most people if you ask them if they want peace they say, ' yes '.
So, since most people say they want peace, then why isn't there more peace on earth.
To me 2 Timothy 3:1-5,13 has bearing on reality because it describes the selfish distorted form of love the world now displays which is in sharp contrast to the definition of love as defined at 1 Corinthians 13:4-6 the type of love Jesus showed.
I wonder what is your reality about the world scene
Thank you for your thought-out reply.
Since my high school English teacher was, in her thinking, an agnostic, then to me being an agnostic would Not make her also an atheist. So, now it seems the modern thinking is being an 'atheist/agnostic' which she wasn't.
A meek person is a humble as opposed to being a haughty person. A mild person without being haughty or vain.
A meek person is a person who can be taught as per Psalms 25:9.
Someone with meekness does Not become heated up with anger - Psalms 37:8-11 - but tries to be calm.
A meek or humble person would Not brag by 'blowing his own horn', so to speak - Proverbs 27:2
To his enemy he would give food and drink as per Proverbs 25:21.
So, to me biblical meekness is a virtue worthy of imitation - Philippians 4:8 - and Not absurd.
How did I determine that ? was from a clipping by a Professor Frantisek Vyskocil who did research in neurophysiology. He got that information from a Russian scientist and professor.
Also, in the book Nanomedicine stated the body is make up of 41 chemical elements as building blocks.
So, what made these life-less building blocks live, or where does the spark of life come from ?
Antony Flew (4/8/2010) concluded that DNA research has shown by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangments which are needed to produce life, that intelligence must have been involved.
I'm surprised to read ^ above ^ that Christians are among the very group that has the most interest in atheism.
I never heard that nor had or showed interest in atheism.
In the 60's I played chess with an atheist while a friend attended college in NYC.
He said he had some questions that we could discuss.
One was about how corrupt the clergy is. I told him the clergy was corrupt in Jesus' day so it is No surprise today.
Plus, he wanted to go to the United Nations and wanted me to explain to him the Isaiah Wall as the U.N. Plaza.
Other than that, I had Not given much interest in atheism.
My high school English teacher had us read and discuss poetry written by atheists (or at least ones without faith).
That poetry did Not spark an interest in atheism in me, but it did make for a lively discussions.
Ok, what is the first law of thermodynamics.
Disorder or randomness in the universe, but out of chaos was brought forth order.
So, without a Creator, the universe could revert, but since I believe there is a Creator then it will Not revert.
Does older have to mean as in aging like a person or animal ages and dies.
The universe has stellar nurseries, that is Not showing growing older/aging.
What consequences, I have No idea.