• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Whose Side Are You On, God's Or That Of Morality?

Skwim

Veteran Member
When it's been pointed out how immoral god was for cruelly killing innocent people for things they were not responsible for (consider the innocent children of Sodom who were killed when god set fire to the town) Christians typically explain it away by saying god killed these innocent people for a very good reason, A reason we will never know, but is justified because god is good, and therefore would never do an unkind or immoral thing: God had an excellent and justifiable reason for killing innocent mothers and their babies; although, we will never know his reason or the justification.

For the non-believer this is hardly a convincing argument, but so be it, what else can the Christian say? However, speaking of god's pristine morality I ask you to consider the morality of SLAVERY; owning another human being; forcing that person to do unpaid work, and being permitted to beat him or her? Today, almost all peoples of the world condemn slavery because of its immorality. As has been pointed out:

"Although slavery does seem 'obviously wrong' it's worth listing some of the reasons why it's wrong.
1) Slavery increases total human unhappiness
2) The slave-owner treats the slaves as the means to achieve the slave-owner's ends, not as an end in themselves
3) Slavery exploits and degrades human beings
4)Slavery violates human rights: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights explicitly forbids slavery and many of the practices associated with slavery
5) Slavery uses force or the threat of force on other human beings
6) Slavery leaves a legacy of discrimination and disadvantage
7) Slavery is both the result and the fuel of racism, in that many cultures show clear racism in their choice of people to enslave
8) Slavery is both the result and the fuel of gender discrimination
9) Slavery perpetuates the abuse of children"
source

In moral philosophy there's an ethical theory called deontology that states that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules, rather than based on the consequences of the action.

"Most deontologists argue that slavery is wrong because it violates a person's rights. They believe everyone has a right to life and to choose how they will live within the rules of society. Deontologists believe it is wrong to treat people merely as objects and tools, to treat people merely as a means to end.

So, slavery is wrong because it violates rights, fairness, and justice. It does not matter if slavery has good or bad economic consequences, it is wrong period. It does not matter if slavery promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number, it is wrong because it violates the rights of one human being.
source

Could there be better reasons for condemning slavery? I don't think so. Slavery obliterates an individual's self-governance or sovereignty. It takes over a person's life by others who have not obtained any authority to do this other than by the fact that they are mightier. YET! the Christian god thinks slavery is just fine: quite moral---presumably, if he thought it was immoral he wouldn't condone it.

In Exodus god even sets out rules for owning slaves. A few of them:

Exodus 21:2-3
2 When you buy a Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, and in the seventh he shall go out free, for nothing. 3 If he comes in single, he shall go out single; if he comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him.

Exodus 21:7-8

7 When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she shall not go out as the male slaves do. 8 If she does not please her master, who has designated her for himself, then he shall let her be redeemed.

Exodus 21:20-21

20 If a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod and he dies at his hand, he shall be punished. 21If, however, he survives a day or two, no vengeance shall be taken; for he is his property.​

and in Leviticus we are told:

Leviticus 25: 44-46
44 As for your male and female slaves whom you may have: you may buy male and female slaves from among the nations that are around you. 45 You may also buy from among the strangers who sojourn with you and their clans that are with you, who have been born in your land, and they may be your property. 46 You may bequeath them to your sons after you to inherit as a possession forever. You may make slaves of them, but over your brothers the people of Israel you shall not rule, one over another ruthlessly.​

And the acceptance of slavery didn't end with the arrival of Jesus Christ. The New Testament makes no condemnation of slavery and does no more than admonish slaves to be obedient and their masters not to be unfair.

Ephesians 6:5-8
5 Slaves, be obedient to those who are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in the sincerity of your heart, as to Christ; 6 not by way of eyeservice, as men-pleasers, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart. 7 With good will render service, as to the Lord, and not to men, 8 knowing that whatever good thing each one does, this he will receive back from the Lord, whether slave or free.

1 Timothy 6:1-2
1 All who are under the yoke [note the recognition of oppression] as slaves are to regard their own masters as worthy of all honor so that the name of God and our doctrine will not be spoken against. 2 Those who have believers as their masters must not be disrespectful to them because they are brethren, but must serve them all the more, because those who partake of the benefit are believers and beloved. Teach and preach these principles.

So, whose side are you on:


The side of those who feel slavery is wrong because it violates a person's dignity and rights. The right to life and to choose how one will live within the rules of society? Or on god's side, who doesn't care if slavery obliterates an individual's self-governance or sovereignty and, in fact, condones it?

.
 
Last edited:

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
Shouldn't the OP title read "Jehovah" as the thread is specifically against that god rather than reading a generalized, non-descript "god" that can mean anything from Zeus to the universe?
 

Axe Elf

Prophet
I'm on God's side. I think we, as humans, tend to think way too much of ourselves, our own importance, our dignity and our "rights" than we should, most (if not all) of the time. Being allowed to stare our human selfishness in the face from time to time (along with the occasional genocide, natural disasters, and loss of our firstborn) help to keep things in perspective as to what we actually "deserve."
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
I'm on God's side. I think we, as humans, tend to think way too much of ourselves, our own importance, our dignity and our "rights" than we should, most (if not all) of the time. Being allowed to stare our human selfishness in the face from time to time (along with the occasional genocide, natural disasters, and loss of our firstborn) help to keep things in perspective as to what we actually "deserve."

If we don't deserve anything, that would suggest we also don't deserve a more powerful being making things more difficult.

Cuts both ways, philosophically.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
That's why I asked. The title says "god," which really says nothing, but the thread is about Jehovah.
"Jehovah" is a made-up word, derived from the German transliteration of the Hebrew "YHVH." with vowels added for convenience.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
"Jehovah" is a made-up word, derived from the German transliteration of the Hebrew "YHVH." with vowels added for convenience.
It's derived from Latin, was introduced by an Italian monk, and seems to have appeared first in English Protestant Bibles.
 

Axe Elf

Prophet
If we don't deserve anything, that would suggest we also don't deserve a more powerful being making things more difficult.

I would never assert that we deserve God.

But "making things more difficult"? Making things more difficult than WHAT, exactly?
 

osgart

Nothing my eye, Something for sure
Morality i side with. You can reason it out, and develope your conscience through experience and research also. There is the capacity to care that has nothing to do with a god.

God suggests that a perfect world exists, and a perfect being. Theres nothing perfect about existence. Its some sort of opiate believing in god. A cure all. Its an artificial high.

Whats so moral about a belief requirement? Nothing.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I'm on God's side. I think we, as humans, tend to think way too much of ourselves, our own importance, our dignity and our "rights" than we should, most (if not all) of the time. Being allowed to stare our human selfishness in the face from time to time (along with the occasional genocide, natural disasters, and loss of our firstborn) help to keep things in perspective as to what we actually "deserve."
Yes, and God was perfectly please to drown the lot of us, babies and all. I fail to see the "perspective" in that, but as I posted in another thread just today (forgive the repetition):

My guide to my life is really very simple:
  • I exist, that is, there is something that it is like to be me, and I am aware of it; I thus assume that is true for everyone else.
  • I wish to be at liberty to live my life according to my own lights, free to take or ignore the advice of others, so long as I do not knowingly do harm to others; I thus assume others would like to do the same, and I therefore must bind myself to respect their choices, as I would require them to respect mine.
  • I have no faith beliefs that lead me to assume that my existence is anything more than temporary, and therefore my choices are informed by that assumption; I recognize that others do have such faith beliefs, and that their choices are likewise so informed, and that we should respect one another for our beliefs or lack thereof, since neither of us can actually prove anything.
  • I recognize that I am not perfect, and am therefore likely to sometimes act against my own personal beliefs and even best interests, or against others in spite of myself, and that I should have to make recompense or suffer consequences for so doing. I hold others to the same standard.
Given those few rules, do you think I find it difficult to make, or at least recognize, good moral choices?
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
It's derived from Latin, was introduced by an Italian monk, and seems to have appeared first in English Protestant Bibles.
It began as the Hebrew tetragrammaton, transliterated into the Latin script: "YHWH," with an Old Germanic or medieval Latin 'J' substituted for the phonemically identical modern 'Y' and a similarly identical 'V' for the 'W' -- add the vowels from "Adonhai," to make it pronouncable, and voila! -- Jehovah.
jehovah | Origin and meaning of jehovah by Online Etymology Dictionary
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
I'm on God's side. I think we, as humans, tend to think way too much of ourselves, our own importance, our dignity and our "rights" than we should, most (if not all) of the time. Being allowed to stare our human selfishness in the face from time to time (along with the occasional genocide, natural disasters, and loss of our firstborn) help to keep things in perspective as to what we actually "deserve."
I take you to mean then that you believe god sanctions slavery so we can "stare our human selfishness in the face from time to time." How about this: How about eliminating slavery so as to have one less way to express our selfishness? A selfishness that comes at a very high cost to others. And I assume the "we" who are deserving to be slaves don't include yourself.

.
 

Axe Elf

Prophet
Yes, and God was perfectly please to drown the lot of us, babies and all. I fail to see the "perspective" in that, but as I posted in another thread just today (forgive the repetition):

My guide to my life is really very simple:
  • I exist, that is, there is something that it is like to be me, and I am aware of it; I thus assume that is true for everyone else.
  • I wish to be at liberty to live my life according to my own lights, free to take or ignore the advice of others, so long as I do not knowingly do harm to others; I thus assume others would like to do the same, and I therefore must bind myself to respect their choices, as I would require them to respect mine.
  • I have no faith beliefs that lead me to assume that my existence is anything more than temporary, and therefore my choices are informed by that assumption; I recognize that others do have such faith beliefs, and that their choices are likewise so informed, and that we should respect one another for our beliefs or lack thereof, since neither of us can actually prove anything.
  • I recognize that I am not perfect, and am therefore likely to sometimes act against my own personal beliefs and even best interests, or against others in spite of myself, and that I should have to make recompense or suffer consequences for so doing. I hold others to the same standard.
Given those few rules, do you think I find it difficult to make, or at least recognize, good moral choices?

I'm not sure why this is expressed in response to my post. Other than the first couple of sentences, it doesn't seem to be related to anything that I said.

But since the final question appears to be asking me, I will answer; I don't know. I can't speak for what you find difficult, nor what you would define as "good moral choices."
 

Axe Elf

Prophet
I take you to mean then that you believe god sanctions slavery so we can "stare our human selfishness in the face from time to time." How about this: How about eliminating slavery so as to have one less way to express our selfishness? A selfishness that comes at a very high cost to others. And I assume the "we" who are deserving to be slaves don't include yourself..

You'll have to take your suggestions on how an omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, and omnibenevolent being could improve on the best of all possible universes up with that being Himself. From my own perspective, limited as it is in time and space, I find it impossible to know whether or not your suggestion to abolish slavery would result in a better or worse universe--although pure reason suggests it would be worse.

And don't be silly. Of course the human race--the "we" who are not deserving of anything whatsoever--includes myself.
 

Cacotopia

Let's go full Trottle
I would never assert that we deserve God.

But "making things more difficult"? Making things more difficult than WHAT, exactly?
Making up reasons for why things are what they are, then finding out a few thousand years later that they were wrong in the first place and now we have to literally tear people off of the teat of religion to get them to think for themselves kind of complicated.
 
Last edited:

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
I would never assert that we deserve God.

But "making things more difficult"? Making things more difficult than WHAT, exactly?

I'm not directing this to your beliefs about God since I don't know them.
But some people see hardships as God's trials, or punishment, or whatever.

Perhaps we don't 'deserve' anything, as you say. But that would also mean we don't deserve punishment, or someone deliberately making life more difficult that it otherwise would be.

Otherwise it becomes masochism.
 

Axe Elf

Prophet
Making up reasons for why things are what they are, then finding out a few thousand years later that they were wrong in the first place and now we have to literally tear people off of the teet of religion to get them to think for themselves kind of complicated.

I think the word you are grasping for is "teat" (though I can hardly blame you for that).

Unfortunately, I can't make any further sense out of your run-on sentence fragment in the context it appears.
 

Cacotopia

Let's go full Trottle
I think the word you are grasping for is "teat" (though I can hardly blame you for that).

Unfortunately, I can't make any further sense out of your run-on sentence fragment in the context it appears.
Oh sorry I should have put semicolons in there to make it more legible to your glassed over eyes.
 
Top