BSM1
What? Me worry?
Uhh...doesn't roll off the tongue as smoothly, no pun intended.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Uhh...doesn't roll off the tongue as smoothly, no pun intended.
Whew! That's a relief. So no worries about global warming and now I can buy this truck with a clear conscience:
I can't even find the estimated gas mileage for it. ( Insert Tim Allen ape sounds here.)
why not? the bible doesn't dictate to pollute the environment or kill other humans. it even suggests we should be vegetarians.
I disagree. The Bible is a historical narrative and it is packed with accounts of human behavior which so often includes murder, killing, and wars. Recording human behavior and events does not equate with condoning it and as a matter of fact the Bible condemns such behavior as sinful.The bible if packed with condonement of killing other humans but i believe you are correct about pollution
I disagree. The Bible is a historical narrative and it is packed with accounts of human behavior which so often includes murder, killing, and wars. Recording human behavior and events does not equate with condoning it and as a matter of fact the Bible condemns such behavior as sinful.
If you are referring to the flood where only Noah's family was saved, then Genesis chapter 6 gives the reasons why God sent the flood and saved Noah and his family. So no, I don't believe this counts as murder/killing in the sense that humans murder one another and which the sixth commandment forbids. The scriptures clearly reveal the flood as God's Judgement upon evil. God is the Creator and the Judge, so there is a difference.Ahh history of god killing every human on the planet except a good buddy and close family doesn't count?
If you are referring to the flood where only Noah's family was saved, then Genesis chapter 6 gives the reasons why God sent the flood and saved Noah and his family. So no, I don't believe this counts as murder/killing in the sense that humans murder one another and which the sixth commandment forbids. The scriptures clearly reveal the flood as God's Judgement upon evil. God is the Creator and the Judge, so there is a difference.
The wickedness of man was great in the earth. Gen. 6:5
Every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. Gen. 6:5
The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence. Gen. 6:11
So God looked upon the earth, and indeed it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth.
Gen. 6:5
But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord. This is the genealogy of Noah. Noah was a just man, perfect in his generations. Noah walked with God. 10 And Noah begot three sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Gen. 6:8-10
I am curious how you can possibly know God brought about the flood and His judgement of humanity ...Sorry, lets see if i understand what you wrote here. You dont believe killing an entire population without trial is murder because they didnt follow rules that weren't published, made public or known.
To me, killing on a whim is murder, doing it on such a scale is genocide. To you its just god being god so it worthy of worship
I am curious how you can possibly know God brought about the flood and His judgement of humanity ...
"on a whim"? According to the account it took Noah about 100 years to build the ark. During this 100 year period, Noah preached and warned the people concerning righteousness. God never brings judgement without giving long periods of warning and providing amply opportunity for people to change and escape the coming judgement. If any besides Noah and his family had paid attention and wanted to escape they could have and would have.
I worship God because I believe He is always Just and has valid reasons for all His actions.
I dont say there was a biblical flood, the bible does.
So you say noah, while building an impossible to build ark (it's evern impossible using then available materials with todays technology) also travelled to every continent and island populated by humans to preach? Presumably he also coaxed the animals to leave the environment in which they can a survive to go live in a semi desert and spend a year in a wooden boat.
You are welcome to your belief.
I pointed out to one fine flood-believer that the antarctic ice deeply predates any such flood. No prob, he says,
the ice floated up, and then settled back down.
When I convinced him (amazing!) that the ice would break up and drift away, he decided it had not floated at all, because it is stuck down. That was after saying that the circumpolar current just let it spin around in place, so it did not drift away!
The attitude that god is on their side, and their book is infallible is more powerful than even the adhesive power of rock to stone!
Its a good argument that I've never considered. Even floating up it would show a layer of 40 days worth of constant, very heavy rain (around 220 metres per day) around the time of the claimed flood.
I've not got too deeply into the flood thing on this forum. In the past I've used several arguments, some technical some humorous, all valid. From various aspects of logistics, volume of the ark, where where the seven blue whales stored? Storage for a years supply of food for around 60 million animals, some of which were carnivorous. How were wood boring fauna prevented from doing what comes naturally. Who did the mucking out and the best, maths and facts, it would require about 3.5 times more water than has ever existed on earth.
The logic of the bible literalist cannot be comprehended by normal means.
The secret is to use gopher wood
Claims such as this reflect little more than bias and do little to enhance either the topic or your credibility.The "good life" being defined as? Ethical, sustainable use of the earth
is not presented as a value, let alone a mandate in your bible.
And a generous helping of god magic
Another story that does not hold up to scrutiny is the one about "Paul" and the snake bite.