I would tend to agree with you, but the adherents of naturalism here look at things in a skewed way such as differentiating that which is "natural" and that which is "supernatural." I think I have showed these words have human judgment behind it, so are objective, descriptive terms.
Naturalism is a "
philosophy, a theory that relates
scientific method to philosophy by affirming that all beings and events in the
universe (whatever their
inherent character may be) are natural. Consequently, all knowledge of the universe falls within the pale of scientific investigation. Although naturalism denies the existence of truly supernatural realities, it makes allowance for the supernatural, provided that knowledge of it can be had indirectly—that is, that natural objects be influenced by the so-called supernatural entities in a detectable way."
In our case with RF, the majority of adherents of naturalism make a judgment in placing objects that are natural or supernatural category based on what exists and what doesn't exist. Thus, I was pointing out in my post above that:
"The belief in an unseen spiritual realm is a fundamental premise of
theism, who hold to a spiritual
worldview standing in contrast to the
atheistic premise of
naturalism, which denies the existence of any spiritual phenomena.
The Scripture does not differentiate between supernatural and natural. These are secular definitions to separate what secularists view as "reality" (the natural world) from "make-believe" (the supernatural world). In their view, the natural world is where God is "not", and the supernatural world is where God, faeries, pixies and miscellaneous deities cohabitate. In contrast, God upholds the entire creation by the word of his power (
Hebrews 1:3), so there is no place in the entire creation where God is "not". The irony here is that the world the secularists describe as "reality" (the world where God-is-not) is actually a make-believe world."
God is described as unseen or invisible. That does not mean he doesn't exist. Many things are invisible like force of gravity. God is described as spiritual. I think that we recognize a spirit exists in all of us even though it is is unseen. Else we are dead. So we can say that a being described as such can exist. God is also described as a being with qualities that are human. He can be described with a human face, voice and features. He has values. We have a conscience or a knowledge of what is right or wrong unless one has mutated into evil or has a mental disorder. I think if one gets past the narrow views of the naturalists (that which is natural, materialistic or physical), then we see that our world isn't just that. It isn't just natural, materialistic or physical versus that which is imaginary. Our world isn't run by nature, but by God. However, the naturalism cannot accept that, so they look for things that are imaginary to explain how our world is not under God's command.