Alt Thinker
Older than the hills
Thank you AVI
Well the question should be, "Why does today's physics say that it is impossible?" Because it, on the surfice, breaks the Law of the Conservation of Matter. Which basically says that matter can not be created or destroyed. Stephen Hawking had the same problem with today's physics with his Black Hole math because it claims that matter just goes into a black Hole and is "gone", Which breaks the Law of the Conservation of Matter because matter can not be destroyed. Stephen Hawlking's answer was that it is not destroyed, it just goes into a different dimension. Which now the String Theory folks are beginning to understand. And according to old physics it is impossible for matter to go into a Black Hole and be gone. No longer a part of anything that today's science can measure. Left Creation.
Anywayit turns out that if you set up the right energy environments that you can let energey back in again. If you let in a lot of it, then you get the same thing that happens when universes are created. The key is to let little bits in at a time, and those little bits, can cause nuclear change.
The hills are a live with untapped energy sorces
A point that seems obvious to me but for some reason no scientist ever talks about it, at least that I can find:
If you drop something into a black hole you never observe it reach the event horizon. You see it moving slower and slower, assuming it does not become effectively unobservable due to time dilation red shift. But in theory it would be possible to continuing observing the object for any arbitrary finite period of time. From the point of view of the observer, the object never leaves the universe and no laws are violated. From the point of view of the object, the trip to the event horizon is of only finite duration but it never observes itself disappearing. So again no laws are violated.
