Where is the justice in killing an innocent creature for something you did wrong, and then having the audacity to feel justified by killing it?No, it is about forgiveness and justice.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Where is the justice in killing an innocent creature for something you did wrong, and then having the audacity to feel justified by killing it?No, it is about forgiveness and justice.
You don't purify your mind through cruel acts and blood sacrifices. Simply projecting your mental hang ups onto others doesn't work--that is self-delusion. You want to wake up from your self-delusion. You have to purify your mind so you don't do these sins. Projecting your sins onto others in hopes your own mental problems go away does not work--you are deluding yourself if you think it does. You have to do the soul-searching and fix yourself.
I must disagree and I think this verse quoted above in Romans is out of context. That passage in Romans is speaking to believers who are alive about living as if they are dead to sin and alive in Christ...Likewise you also, reckon yourselves to be dead indeed to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus our Lord (verse 11), This is not in anyway indicating that anyone must or even possibly could gain absolute forgiveness for their sins by their own death or shed blood and I believe any such doctrine is diametrically opposed to the gospel of Jesus Christ. There are numerous verses and passages in the scriptures which show that believers are forgiven and cleansed from sin while they are alive and only through the blood of Christ which has already been shed once and for all.
In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace which He made to abound toward us in all wisdom and prudence...Eph. 1:7-8
He has delivered us from the power of darkness and conveyed us into the kingdom of the Son of His love, in whom we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins. Col. 1:13-14
But if we walk in the light as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus Christ His Son cleanses us from all sin. If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.1 John 1:7-9
Is not the altar (Mizbeach) where the blood is sprinkled and drained out (verse 9) the same altar upon which the flour is burned (verse 12)?
I'll see your 9:22 and raise you 10:24...
Heb 10:4
For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats could take away sins.
Absolutely spot on.
what Tumah failed to point out about the scripture in Leviticus 5 is this:
Now if he cannot afford two turtledoves or two young pigeons, he must bring as his offering for his sin a tenth of an e′phah of fine flour for a sin offering.
Not all Isrealites could afford to buy an animal for sacrificing. The poorer isrealites were given the option of offering something they could afford.
When we put it in context, we can see that the flour and grain sacrifices were for the poor to offer as a sin offering. If you were not poor, you would have been offering the required blood sacrifices.
And in Leviticus 9, Moses instructs Aaron and his sons to kill a calf as a sin offering.
This isn't the only reference to sacrificial sin offerings.
What am I missing?
Be that as it may, what we see from here is that it is absolutely possible to receive atonement without any blood.
but not possible to be 'absolutely exonerated' of the consequences of sin, namely death.
God will forgive, but he will not give exemption from punishment as Numbers 14:18  says: ‘Jehovah, slow to anger and abundant in loving-kindness, pardoning error and transgression, but by no means will he give exemption from punishment, bringing punishment for the error of the fathers upon sons, upon the third generation and upon the fourth generation.’
How can we get exemption from the punishment of death inflicted upon our first father Adam?
Why do some people type G-D instead of God?
This is bugging me.
I have to know
That is definitely possible as we see from Enoch, Elijah and others.
But really that's besides the point. The sacrificial system are for sins that I do. Shedding blood is not the only way to gain atonement for those sins. That is the point. There are no verses that says, "and it will be partially forgiven him." There are verses that say, "and it will be forgiven him."
Also, your Bible's doing it wrong. It says:
G-d, long faced (ie. long fused), abundant kindness, bears sin and transgression; and cleans, doesn't clean (see Ex. 33:19); redeems the sin of the father on the sons, on the thirds and on the fourths.
Regardless, that didn't really change with Jesus either, now did it? JWs are still dying.
Enoch didn't continue to live. He was taken in death to protect him from the wicked people of that time. Death is death....it doesn't mean life.
only if you are a poor person remember. Blood sacrifices were required by all unless someone couldn't afford to present them.
you are quoting a completely different verse.
My quote is from Numbers 14:18. What is wrong about it? It says that the consequences of sin are not removed from anyone.
Even King David was not protected from the consequences of his sins. His child died even though he prayed all night for its deliverance.
Not even the Gods anointed ones are spared from the reality of sin and death.
Not yet. But we havnt' entered the judgement day yet. When we do, the dead will rise and death will be removed.
.
Kinda makes Jesus superfluous, doesn't it?
Not if Jesus IS the resurrection.
He is the one who will be brining back the dead...and the one who will be removing the wicked.
Ehm , still waiting for the explanation as to why there was still sacrifice occurring?
During the time of Jesus...
Why wouldn't there be? There was still a Temple.
ahhhhhhhh nevermind.
got it. clever argument.