• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

G-d's Grace and the Free Gift of Righteousness?

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
Someone has challenged:
Hi Brickjectivity, I did read your last post and I was wondering if you could give me your explanation for G-d's Grace and the Free Gift of Righteousness? I really think that Paul is speaking here in Romans 3 about how our sin becomes righteousness.
Thanks for your interaction. First, I'm not a scholar and also I've never discoursed upon this subject. I'm not telling you how it is but how I see it at the moment. I'm the son of Protestants with no tradition or catechism to rely upon.

I think that the 'Free Gift of Righteousness' refers to the concept in Ephesians 2:11-13, which is the destruction of the Dead Law which the Gentiles were under, placing them instead under the Law of the Spirit. I draw this conclusion based upon the fact that Jesus and Paul uphold Moses law as valid. Some law was destroyed in order to make the two (Gentiles and Jews) into one. Moses law is part of the 'Word of God' which Jesus also describes as 'Living and Active' and which therefore cannot be dead, cannot be the law which Paul speaks of as having been abolished. The Free Gift of Righteousness, therefore elevates Gentiles to equality with Jews though without replacing them. It doesn't put them below or above us, just like the rib taken from Adam's side didn't put Eve above or below him but equal to him. They were first, so there is a kind of difference but there is also equality. Gentiles aren't Jewish, don't do circumcision or eat special foods. We don't get certain benefits that come from doing that, but we also don't shoulder the responsibility that comes with it. That is what I think the relevant passages are talking about where it concerns the 'Free gift of righteousness.' I do not think it means that you don't have to make up for wrongs done. You do.

The Grace of God is very much related and practically the same thing. Acts 11:23 uses this phrase like this: "When he arrived and saw the evidence of the grace of God, he was glad and encouraged them all to remain true to the Lord with all their hearts." The Grace of God is the power to become Sons of God as mentioned in John 1.

That's what I think. Thanks!
 
Last edited:

Ken Brown

Well-Known Member
Someone has challenged:
Thanks for your interaction. First, I'm not a scholar and also I've never discoursed upon this subject. I'm not telling you how it is but how I see it at the moment. I'm the son of Protestants with no tradition or catechism to rely upon.

I think that the 'Free Gift of Righteousness' refers to the concept in Ephesians 2:11-13, which is the destruction of the Dead Law which the Gentiles were under, placing them instead under the Law of the Spirit. I draw this conclusion based upon the fact that Jesus and Paul uphold Moses law as valid. Some law was destroyed in order to make the two (Gentiles and Jews) into one. Moses law is part of the 'Word of God' which Jesus also describes as 'Living and Active' and which therefore cannot be dead, cannot be the law which Paul speaks of as having been abolished. The Free Gift of Righteousness, therefore elevates Gentiles to equality with Jews though without replacing them. It doesn't put them below or above us, just like the rib taken from Adam's side didn't put Eve above or below him but equal to him. They were first, so there is a kind of difference but there is also equality. Gentiles aren't Jewish, don't do circumcision or eat special foods. We don't get certain benefits that come from doing that, but we also don't shoulder the responsibility that comes with it. That is what I think the relevant passages are talking about where it concerns the 'Free gift of righteousness.' I do not think it means that you don't have to make up for wrongs done. You do.

The Grace of God is very much related and practically the same thing. Acts 11:23 uses this phrase like this: "When he arrived and saw the evidence of the grace of God, he was glad and encouraged them all to remain true to the Lord with all their hearts." The Grace of God is the power to become Sons of God as mentioned in John 1.

That's what I think. Thanks!

Hi Brickjectivity, thank you so much for the explanation. I try to keep it simple. I see the Free Gift of Righteousnness as G-d's Gift to us for sinning. We ALL sinned, and sacrificed Yeshua, therefore we ALL have accomplished Righteousness. This is why Paul spoke as he did, because he saw how our lies and disobedience manifested the Righteousness that comes from G-d as a free gift. This is why some would falsely say that Paul taught to do evil, so that good may result. You see, Paul saw how everyone sinned and in that sinning they did accomplish the just requirement of the Law, which is...Sinner, sacrifice for your sin. All sinners did this, and then through faith in their sacrificing of Yeshua, that sin is turned into a DOING of the LAW, not by works, but by belief and confession that they did slay their Sacrifice. Can you see it? How sin is turned INTO righteousness, but that righteousness is as a filthy bloody cloth:

(Isa 64:6) But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.

KB
 

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
Ken Brown said:
Hi Brickjectivity, thank you so much for the explanation.
You're welcome. Freely you have received, so freely give. Apologies if I'm snooty. I'm not being snooty on purpose.

Ken Brown said:
I try to keep it simple. I see the Free Gift of Righteousnness as G-d's Gift to us for sinning. We ALL sinned, and sacrificed Yeshua, therefore we ALL have accomplished Righteousness.
I was not able to follow that, but no worries. 'A gift to us for sinning' is the part I'm stuck on. You meant we sin to get gifts from God? I don't think that's what you meant, but I'm not sure what you meant.
We ALL sinned, and sacrificed Yeshua, therefore we ALL have accomplished Righteousness.
I believe your frame of reference is one that I've never considered, but I'm not sure. There are layered meanings to words, so I'm having trouble deciding what you mean to be saying. I like short replies, but context is also helpful. You mean 'We all sinned' in what sense? What does 'sinned' mean to you when you say it? How did we sacrifice Yeshua when it was clearly the Romans? Are we the Romans? Perhaps you think his death is ongoing as opposed to something in the past. We don't have to go into it, but I didn't follow what you meant.
This is why Paul spoke as he did, because he saw how our lies and disobedience manifested the Righteousness that comes from G-d as a free gift. This is why some would falsely say that Paul taught to do evil, so that good may result.
I know what you're saying here! You're referring to Romans chapter 7. In this chapter he appears to me to be explaining the reason that sins are permitted by God in the world at all -- why there's a serpent in the Garden of Eden. I tend to view this part of chapter 7 as an allusion to the creation story with the tree of knowledge of good & evil, the serpent and the tree of life. Accusing Paul of teaching to do evil is analogous in a way to accusing God of doing an evil thing for putting the serpent into the garden. It also connects to Romans 9:21 "Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use?" 9:14 "What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all!"

You see, Paul saw how everyone sinned and in that sinning they did accomplish the just requirement of the Law, which is...Sinner, sacrifice for your sin.
I'm not seeing it, because I see sacrifice as something other than a payment for sin. I see it as a unifying event to unify people. The death the Jesus dies, according to my understanding of Paul, his death happens to prove that even a person who hasn't sinned is nevertheless a flawed person. This then becomes Paul's reason that Gentiles can join the Household of Faith (Israel) despite the fact that a Gentile isn't following the law. It is his logical structure by which he believes Jesus death makes we Gentiles 'Clean' in a sense. I'm not saying he's right, but I'm saying that's his argument.

All sinners did this, and then through faith in their sacrificing of Yeshua, that sin is turned into a DOING of the LAW, not by works, but by belief and confession that they did slay their Sacrifice. Can you see it? How sin is turned INTO righteousness, but that righteousness is as a filthy bloody cloth:
I partly agree I think, because Paul is suggesting the Jesus, a sinless man, was nevertheless sentenced to death by God, thus reversing the judgment against humankind. He refers to the judgment against Adam which falls upon everyman. So now the judgment is no longer against the human but against his flesh, not his 'Spirit'. Paul sees a man as a living battle between flesh and spirit. If a man lives by the spirit, then he puts to death the works of his flesh; and this is the path of salvation for the Gentile in Paul's opinion. Returning to what you are saying, it sounds similar. The sin in the flesh, also called the 'Law of sin in my flesh' is convicted, so the man can go free. Its borrowing from the two-goat sacrifice, where one is slain and one is the scape-goat. The flesh is slain, but the 'Breath' of the man is the scape goat.
 
Last edited:

Ken Brown

Well-Known Member
Hi Brickjectivity, I like how you think and write. You really do make an effort to understand what the other person is saying and that is a rare commodity. Here are a few answers to your questions:

Brickjectivity asked:
How did we sacrifice Yeshua when it was clearly the Romans?

Are you not familiar with Hebrews 6:6? Once a believer comes to the knowledge of the Truth concerning the fact that they did crucify Yeshua (by sinning), and truly repent (turn from their sin), but then fall away to where they would again have to be brought to repentance, it would be as if they were crucifying Yeshua again, thus holding Him up to open shame. So, don't think it was the Romans, think of it as how Peter told those who murdered Yeshua, that THEY did it, "with the help of wicked men." (Acts 2:23) And that is exactly how ALL sinners did it, with the help of those wicked men. Here is the Hebrews Scripture:

(Heb 6:6) If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.

Brickjectivity said:
This then becomes Paul's reason that Gentiles can join the Household of Faith (Israel) despite the fact that a Gentile isn't following the law.

In reality, the Gentile and ALL sinners did follow the Law, but it wasn't a following of the Law according to it's physical keeping (works). Have you not read Paul here:

(Rom 9:30) What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith.
(Rom 9:31) But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.
(Rom 9:32) Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;

You see Brickjectivity, the Jew of Paul's day for the most part could not grasp and believe that Yeshua was THEIR sacrifice, they could ONLY look at the Law according to the physical keeping and NOT the Spiritual keeping of it, and they stumbled. The Gentile on the other hand accepted and believed that they did crucify and sacrifice Yeshua, and they did that THROUGH faith. So they, in reality, were the ones who were attaining righteousness, and all they had to do was acknowledge their sin and what it did to Yeshua.

Here is a very important Scripture that Paul wrote:

(Gal 2:17) But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? G-d forbid.

Anyone seeking to be righteous through the sacrifice of Christ, HAD to be a sinner. This is how it works. If you are going to have this righteousness, this DOING of the Law (Rom 2:13), you had to be a sinner. Do you see then how Paul poses the question: "Is therefore Christ the minister of sin?" G-d forbid. But you can see how some would question and say that G-d is a promoter of sin IF it is our sin that is used in giving us righteousness. Paul taught that ALL have sinned, therefore ALL has been given access to the Righteousness that G-d gives as a free gift. And it's just a matter of understanding how the Law is Spiritual, and veiled within it is the suffering, death, burial, and 3rd day resurrection of Yeshua. Coming to a knowledge of the Truth about how a sinner did cause the suffering and death of the Messiah is the catalyst for delivering a sinner FROM their sin.

I have to go for now, but please consider how sin is turned INTO righteousness through the Sacrifice of Yeshua. KB
 

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
Ken Brown said:
Hi Brickjectivity, I like how you think and write. You really do make an effort to understand what the other person is saying and that is a rare commodity. Here are a few answers to your questions:
Yes, but I need reminders sometimes.

Are you not familiar with Hebrews 6:6? Once a believer comes to the knowledge of the Truth concerning the fact that they did crucify Yeshua (by sinning), and truly repent (turn from their sin), but then fall away to where they would again have to be brought to repentance, it would be as if they were crucifying Yeshua again, thus holding Him up to open shame. So, don't think it was the Romans, think of it as how Peter told those who murdered Yeshua, that THEY did it, "with the help of wicked men." (Acts 2:23) And that is exactly how ALL sinners did it, with the help of those wicked men. Here is the Hebrews Scripture:

(Heb 6:6) If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
I'm marginally familiar with your approach, but I have changed the way I think about what this author means. For instance I think it is a larger Truth this author refers to than the truth that any individual can speak, and he pressed that point. I think he's convinced (Heb 1:1) that Truth is only revealed in parts, facets over time or by direct revelation (the Son).

Hebrews 6:6, well for some time I've thought that this is about connecting with other believers, continuing to meet. That is just how it seems to me in the context based upon comments such as 2:1, and 10:25. You crucify Jesus publicly if you join Christ's body and then leave. Private sins are in a private category.

In reality, the Gentile and ALL sinners did follow the Law, but it wasn't a following of the Law according to it's physical keeping (works). Have you not read Paul here:

(Rom 9:30) What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith.
(Rom 9:31) But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.
(Rom 9:32) Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;
Its fuzzy what he means by 'Law', because just using Paul's letters as context its not clear which law. It appears to be contextual, as if he's speaking to someone who knows him and has already been taught by him.

Yes I have read that. The mistake I'd like to avoid though is thinking that Paul is revealing anything new, because I think he is speaking about basics that Jews would already understand. Pursuing righteousness through faithfulness, for instance, is straight out of the Tanach in Habakkuk. It is a little confusing that the Greek word 'Pistes' can mean either 'Faith' or 'Faithfulness' depending upon the context; but clearly it ought to match the text it was quoted from in which is 'Faithfulness'. This does not interfere with the meaning in Hebrews and actually is very helpful in analyzing the text. It adds one extra step, because Romans 9:32 must be read "...Because they sought it not by faithfulness..." in order to make sense. Faith they had in piles, but faithfulness was their weakness. Its reasonable in this case to make the substitution, because its so blatantly obvious and its so frequently debated and footnoted that I'm in no way disrespecting the translators. They made a call, and it was the wrong one.

You see Brickjectivity, the Jew of Paul's day for the most part could not grasp and believe that Yeshua was THEIR sacrifice, they could ONLY look at the Law according to the physical keeping and NOT the Spiritual keeping of it, and they stumbled. The Gentile on the other hand accepted and believed that they did crucify and sacrifice Yeshua, and they did that THROUGH faith. So they, in reality, were the ones who were attaining righteousness, and all they had to do was acknowledge their sin and what it did to Yeshua.
This is looking at Jews as if they were ignorant fops which couldn't be further from the reality. It is the bias we have inherited from centuries of separation from the Jewish culture, when it was profitable for our royal leaders to mislead us by telling us that Jews couldn't comprehend anything. We must remove this bias and recalculate separately from it, even though it hurts.

The Jew could not accept that despite all their good deeds and belief and resistance to corruption that the Romans still were permitted to devastate their homeland. Like Jesus upon the cross they were saying 'Why has thou forsaken me?' This should make sense to you, because both the Jews and Jesus are called the son of God in the Bible, which says "When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son."(Hosea 11:1), which is quoted in Matthew 2:5 as fulfilled when Jesus leaves Egypt. Both sons were asking why had they been forsaken and what had they done wrong to deserve to be crucified.

Here is a very important Scripture that Paul wrote:

(Gal 2:17) But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? G-d forbid.

Anyone seeking to be righteous through the sacrifice of Christ, HAD to be a sinner. This is how it works.
This relates to atonement. The Levites always would teach the Jews about atonement for their sins, but for Gentiles there was no atonement. A Gentile could not draw near to God like a Jewish person could. Jews recognized themselves as sinners having a need for atonement, because they had access to atonement. The Gentiles, through faith in Jesus, began to seek atonement. Hebrews 4:16 says about this "Let us then approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need." This is the result of Jesus atonement.

If you are going to have this righteousness, this DOING of the Law (Rom 2:13), you had to be a sinner. Do you see then how Paul poses the question: "Is therefore Christ the minister of sin?" G-d forbid. But you can see how some would question and say that G-d is a promoter of sin IF it is our sin that is used in giving us righteousness.
I understand what your saying and merely am in disagreement. If I look at the sacrifices listed in Leviticus, there is no sacrifice to cover direct purposeful sinning except for praying, repentance and retribution. The sacrifices are all about atoning for ignorance and accidental sins not purposeful ones. It is the same with Jesus sacrifice upon the cross, because sacrifices are not for removing purposeful willful wins but are about atonement, thanks, fellowship, etc. There are different kinds of 'Sin'. The atonement of Jesus is for every person, but it does not reverse an evil act. When Jesus was dying he prayed his killers would be forgiven, because they didn't know what they were doing. You see there is no free pass to do evil. All evil must cease for those who are in Christ Jesus.
Paul taught that ALL have sinned, therefore ALL has been given access to the Righteousness that G-d gives as a free gift.
Yes, in the sense that all are in need of atonement; but not everyone is an adulterer or a murderer or a thief. We all make mistakes, and none of us can match the righteousness of God. For some things there is no sacrifice except a change of heart and a choice to do right. No blood sacrifice replaces that, and Jesus wouldn't have died for that nor would it make any sense for him to do so.

And it's just a matter of understanding how the Law is Spiritual, and veiled within it is the suffering, death, burial, and 3rd day resurrection of Yeshua. Coming to a knowledge of the Truth about how a sinner did cause the suffering and death of the Messiah is the catalyst for delivering a sinner FROM their sin.
"But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed."(Isaiah 53:5) This is the position of any righteous doer who does God's will, to be misunderstood and hated because of doing good. "Live such good lives among the pagans that, though they accuse you of doing wrong, they may see your good deeds and glorify God on the day he visits us." II Peter 2:12 This is bearing the transgressions of others. Jesus did it, and you can, too.

How terrible it is to realize that corrupt Christians have abused Jews in the past for doing what they knew was right. Pagans have been burned, and other atrocities have been committed. This was not right. James 3:10 is an appropriate rebuke "Out of the same mouth come praise and cursing. My brothers, this should not be." There is nothing for it except to stop doing that, repent etc. The way that we stop doing anything evil is that Gods mercy leads us to stop doing it. "Or do you show contempt for the riches of his kindness, tolerance and patience, not realizing that God's kindness leads you toward repentance?" (Romans 2:4)

Be warm and well fed!
 
Last edited:

Ken Brown

Well-Known Member
Shalom Brickjectivity, another excellent post, especially towards the end of it. I'm in full agreement with you that sacrificing was for unintentional or sins committed in ignorance. This is the state of sinful man. All sinners, in ignorance, did put Yeshua to death, and this sin can be forgiven, but a believer who KNOWS what their sin did, and then turns back to a deliberate life of sin, is like a dog returning to it's vomit, and it would have been better for them to have never known the way of righteousness, than to have known it, and then turn from it.

I would like to simply speak about how the Jews failed and the Gentiles succeeded in accomplishing righteousness. There are two distinct ways of performing righteousness. One way is to take an animal (or grain offering if you cannot afford the animal) and kill it when you have failed in keeping any of the commands of the Torah (Lev 4...). Once you do this sin offering, you have righteousness because you have accomplished what the Torah told you to do for your sin. That way, the way of killing an animal or presenting a grain offering, was the only way the Jew of Paul's day believed in for their pursuit in obtaining righteousness once they had sinned (at least for the most part).

Now, the other way, the way in which a sinner who has failed to keep all that the Torah required for them to do, they could, THROUGH FAITH, believe that Yeshua was THEIR sin offering, and that they did lay their hands upon His Head and did slay Him (with the help of wicked me). By confessing and believing in Yeshua as THEIR sacrifice, they then become DOERS of the Torah with regard to sacrificing for their sin which they committed in ignorance. This belief is credited as righteousness (accomplishing what the Torah required sinners to do for or because of their sin). Once you really see how this works, it demands or forces the sinner to no longer dwell IN sin. Yeshua isn't just a lamb from a endless supply of lambs that we can continue to slaughter, He is the Lamb of G-d, and He came to TAKE AWAY our sin. And we are given a free gift or head start in performing righteousness, because we all (through our sin) did slay our sin offering. This was Paul's message about the free gift of righteousness. You INCREASE sin, you INCREASE righteousness (Grace). The more sinners who are sinning, the more you have those who are killing their sin offering (Yeshua), thus performing what the Torah required of them (which is the Righteousness that comes to us from G-d). This Grace or Free Gift of Righteousness is given so that sinners would be taught to deny ungodliness and worldly lusts, and to live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world. It's about being delivered OUT of sin, and no longer dwelling in it, and when G-d has taken our sin and miraculously turned that sin INTO a doing of the Torah (our sacrificing of Yeshau), we are left with no alternative but to stop sinning from our hearts.

I will end this with the words of Peter as he described the BLESSING we receive through the suffering, death, and resurrection of Yeshua:

(Act 3:26) Unto you first G-d, having raised up his Son Yeshua, sent Him to BLESS you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.

KB
 

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
Ken, thanks for that reply.
Ken Brown said:
Shalom Brickjectivity, another excellent post, especially towards the end of it. I'm in full agreement with you that sacrificing was for unintentional or sins committed in ignorance. This is the state of sinful man. All sinners, in ignorance, did put Yeshua to death, and this sin can be forgiven, but a believer who KNOWS what their sin did, and then turns back to a deliberate life of sin, is like a dog returning to it's vomit, and it would have been better for them to have never known the way of righteousness, than to have known it, and then turn from it.
Jesus see the Jews as the bridge from God to man. (John 1:51) He refers to himself as seated above that ladder at the right hand of the Father. (Related: there is a cool song called "Stairway to Heaven" by Led Zeppelin you might like.) The angels ascend and descend on that ladder. If you no longer participate, no longer support others and cut yourself off then you are without the ladder. You cannot be your own ladder.

I would like to simply speak about how the Jews failed and the Gentiles succeeded in accomplishing righteousness. There are two distinct ways of performing righteousness. One way is to take an animal (or grain offering if you cannot afford the animal) and kill it when you have failed in keeping any of the commands of the Torah (Lev 4...). Once you do this sin offering, you have righteousness because you have accomplished what the Torah told you to do for your sin. That way, the way of killing an animal or presenting a grain offering, was the only way the Jew of Paul's day believed in for their pursuit in obtaining righteousness once they had sinned (at least for the most part).
The Jews are the Son of Man Jesus speaks of, but they are not the angels nor are they the one at the top of that ladder. The ascents and descents I think are the rising and falling of their nation. Every time they fell it was another lash on their back, so they would learn through suffering to be faithful to the principles they knew were right. Both Jesus and the Jews learned obedience in this way, so a Christian ought to expect to learn obedience through suffering as well. At this time the Jews are doing better, so the angels are ascending; but the ladder remains.
Now, the other way, the way in which a sinner who has failed to keep all that the Torah required for them to do, they could, THROUGH FAITH, believe that Yeshua was THEIR sin offering, and that they did lay their hands upon His Head and did slay Him (with the help of wicked me). By confessing and believing in Yeshua as THEIR sacrifice, they then become DOERS of the Torah with regard to sacrificing for their sin which they committed in ignorance. This belief is credited as righteousness (accomplishing what the Torah required sinners to do for or because of their sin). Once you really see how this works, it demands or forces the sinner to no longer dwell IN sin. Yeshua isn't just a lamb from a endless supply of lambs that we can continue to slaughter, He is the Lamb of G-d, and He came to TAKE AWAY our sin. And we are given a free gift or head start in performing righteousness, because we all (through our sin) did slay our sin offering. This was Paul's message about the free gift of righteousness. You INCREASE sin, you INCREASE righteousness (Grace). The more sinners who are sinning, the more you have those who are killing their sin offering (Yeshua), thus performing what the Torah required of them (which is the Righteousness that comes to us from G-d). This Grace or Free Gift of Righteousness is given so that sinners would be taught to deny ungodliness and worldly lusts, and to live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world. It's about being delivered OUT of sin, and no longer dwelling in it, and when G-d has taken our sin and miraculously turned that sin INTO a doing of the Torah (our sacrificing of Yeshau), we are left with no alternative but to stop sinning from our hearts.
There is also prayer, because when there are no sacrifices still you can offer the fruit of your lips (literally the 'Calves' of your lips.) The special thing about Jesus sacrifice is that it concludes that the judgment against humanity is commuted, so now it is a judgment against the flesh but not the spirit. No longer does a Christian have to be physically circumcised for this reason, that his physical non-circumcision symbolizes that redemption has come. The Jew must still be circumcised, however; and both are working parts of a house God builds.

That being said, I haven't decided what I'm going to do myself. I have discovered that all of the scriptures were written in faithfulness without any malicious intent, and I will defend that with my own life. I'm not sure yet how to assist my family, who are charismatics. I'm worried about them.
 

Ken Brown

Well-Known Member
Ken, thanks for that reply.
Jesus see the Jews as the bridge from God to man. (John 1:51) He refers to himself as seated above that ladder at the right hand of the Father. (Related: there is a cool song called "Stairway to Heaven" by Led Zeppelin you might like.) The angels ascend and descend on that ladder. If you no longer participate, no longer support others and cut yourself off then you are without the ladder. You cannot be your own ladder.

The Jews are the Son of Man Jesus speaks of, but they are not the angels nor are they the one at the top of that ladder. The ascents and descents I think are the rising and falling of their nation. Every time they fell it was another lash on their back, so they would learn through suffering to be faithful to the principles they knew were right. Both Jesus and the Jews learned obedience in this way, so a Christian ought to expect to learn obedience through suffering as well. At this time the Jews are doing better, so the angels are ascending; but the ladder remains.
There is also prayer, because when there are no sacrifices still you can offer the fruit of your lips (literally the 'Calves' of your lips.) The special thing about Jesus sacrifice is that it concludes that the judgment against humanity is commuted, so now it is a judgment against the flesh but not the spirit. No longer does a Christian have to be physically circumcised for this reason, that his physical non-circumcision symbolizes that redemption has come. The Jew must still be circumcised, however; and both are working parts of a house God builds.

That being said, I haven't decided what I'm going to do myself. I have discovered that all of the scriptures were written in faithfulness without any malicious intent, and I will defend that with my own life. I'm not sure yet how to assist my family, who are charismatics. I'm worried about them.

Hi Brickjectivity, a very interesting reply on your part, and I did have to read it more than once. And I'm not certain as to what direction I need to go in a response. It seemed like you were just telling me some things that you felt were important, and really didn't address what I wrote. So I guess I will ask you several questions and hopefully they are easily answered:

1. What is the free gift of righteousness that we receive from G-d? How does it work, or what is it?
2. Is Yeshua (Jesus) YOUR sacrifice. What does His suffering, death, burial, and 3rd day resurrection mean to you?

Thanks, and have a great day, and hopefully your family will move in the direction that will benefit you and them. KB
 

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
Ken, I must apologize for not making the connection more clear. That is a fault that I have sometimes, and it can be frustrating.

Ken Brown said:
All sinners, in ignorance, did put Yeshua to death, and this sin can be forgiven, but a believer who KNOWS what their sin did, and then turns back to a deliberate life of sin, is like a dog returning to it's vomit, and it would have been better for them to have never known the way of righteousness, than to have known it, and then turn from it.
Rather than curtly disagree, I point out that Jesus see the Jews as the ladder from God to man, but he now also sees himself as at the top of that ladder, someday. (John 1:51) He refers to himself as seated above that ladder at the right hand of the Father. This is a clear reference to something on one of Daniel's visions, about someone human-like who approaches the throne of the Ancient of Days. Its all very symbolic and I don't pretend to understand it all, but Jesus is referring to that vision as well as Jacob's dream of a ladder. You said that "Sinners put yeshua to death," but I think that is confusing language. It was the Father who was pleased to put him to death. His death was for the purpose of bringing gentiles into the house of God, closer to God. I do not think that gentiles were 'Evil' before Jesus came, because we had consciences and levels of goodness just as Cornelius the gentile did. We did have a judgment against us -- the judgment against Adam which Paul calls the 'Increase of sin'. We did need to be brought back into a higher relationship with God. I object, now, to the way that the Gideons preach 'Gospel' or that altar calls are done in Baptist Churches. I don't like so much subterfuge about what is really happening, and the way that they have of filling people with pat phrases like 'Saved by the blood of the lamb' without any understanding. I've met many people who literally think blood is a magical cleaning agent and am surprised they aren't using it to scrub floors. Therefore when you say 'Sinners killed yeshua' it creates in me a gut reaction, because it is unclear though I do not totally disagree. Sinners sin against themselves, against God and also against everyone.

There are two distinct ways of performing righteousness. One way is to take an animal (or grain offering if you cannot afford the animal) and kill it when you have failed in keeping any of the commands of the Torah (Lev 4...). Once you do this sin offering, you have righteousness because you have accomplished what the Torah told you to do for your sin.
I do not think this has ever been the case. The sacrifices are and yet are not able to perform righteousness. They are like the prayer shawls, special diets and unmixed threads in the clothing, symbolic. First, circumcision must be done in the heart, not just the penis. Secondly it is done on the sacrifice, separating fat from meat, pride from righteous acts. The physical act by itself accomplishes nothing. Amos 5:2 says "Even though you bring me burnt offerings and grain offerings, I will not accept them. Though you bring choice fellowship offerings, I will have no regard for them. " Similary a person cannot merely say "I receive Jesus as personal lord and savior" and have it accomplish anything. They must 'bear their cross, deny themselves and follow Jesus' or his sacrifice is not accepted on their behalf. In other words they must fully participate as a member of his church. They cannot sit by themselves. They cannot say Amen and walk out of the church. (Proverbs 18:1 NKJV) "A man who isolates himself seeks his own desire; He rages against all wise judgment."
That way, the way of killing an animal or presenting a grain offering, was the only way the Jew of Paul's day believed in for their pursuit in obtaining righteousness once they had sinned (at least for the most part).
No, because speaking of the sacrifice is speaking of one's own sacrifice. Isaac was the first sacrifice, and every Jew who sacrifices must sacrifice themselves and thank God for providing a substitute. That is how sacrifices are performed. They aren't cold-hearted butchering ceremonies. The attitude is "Thank you for providing this substitute."

"Enter his gates with thanksgiving and his courts with praise; give thanks to him and praise his name." (Psalm 100:4) That is the only way that sacrifices were performed, because they meant nothing without sincere praise and thanks.

Now, the other way, the way in which a sinner who has failed to keep all that the Torah required for them to do, they could, THROUGH FAITH, believe that Yeshua was THEIR sin offering, and that they did lay their hands upon His Head and did slay Him (with the help of wicked me). By confessing and believing in Yeshua as THEIR sacrifice, they then become DOERS of the Torah with regard to sacrificing for their sin which they committed in ignorance.
I must disagree, because the purpose of a sacrifice is to make a covenant. A covenant connects people together, just as communion connects Christians together. A sacrifice vanquishes sin and makes up for sins through the connections that it brings. (James 5:16) "Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous man is powerful and effective." The 'Healing' that James speaks of is the removal of iniquity, the vanquishing of it and the elevation of the Gentile into the house of faith. This cannot be accomplished by saying 'Oh, I accept Jesus into my heart.' No, that is not how it works. You need to be surrounded by righteous people, supporting one another. (This is why some people choose to go live in monasteries, though I don't know if monasteries are a good idea. A monastery is also a kind of isolation.)

He is the Lamb of G-d, and He came to TAKE AWAY our sin. And we are given a free gift or head start in performing righteousness, because we all (through our sin) did slay our sin offering. This was Paul's message about the free gift of righteousness. You INCREASE sin, you INCREASE righteousness (Grace).
I follow what you're saying, but I testify to what I have seen concerning those who accept Jesus sacrifice without joining together with a fervent commitment to doing good as a shared commitment. They have no sacrifice at all. They are unchanged, un-re-generated, not a new creation. Old things have not passed away for them. They are stuck in whatever rut they have dug for themselves, harmed rather than helped by their faith in Jesus which is really unfaithfulness since they aren't doing anything with it.

This belief is credited as righteousness (accomplishing what the Torah required sinners to do for or because of their sin). Once you really see how this works, it demands or forces the sinner to no longer dwell IN sin.
I have already seen how this works, and it doesn't work as advertised. There must be some misunderstanding about what 'Belief credited as righteousness' means. Abraham kept faith with those he had covenanted with. Isaac, his own future, was the sacrifice until a ram was provided. Someone who follows Jesus sacrifice can do no less than deny himself, and that means putting up with a lot of bull from other Christians. This belief, this faith kept, this toil is what is credited as righteousness. Yes it is a free gift, but no its not without cost. Luke 14 is all about the cost of being a disciple of Jesus, the faith required of a disciple.

You INCREASE sin, you INCREASE righteousness (Grace). The more sinners who are sinning, the more you have those who are killing their sin offering (Yeshua), thus performing what the Torah required of them (which is the Righteousness that comes to us from G-d).
"For if, by the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one man, how much more will those who receive God's abundant provision of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man, Jesus Christ." (Romans 5:17). It is not suggesting that you sin more.

"The law was added so that the trespass might increase. But where sin increased, grace increased all the more, " (Romans 5:20) We were condemned in Adam (our sin increased), but we were made righteous in Jesus (our grace increased more than our sin). In Adam, the archetype or father of us all, we are guilty; but in Jesus this guilt is overlooked. This is not about personal wrongdoings so much as our nature. Romans 8:3 "...God did by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, on account of sin: He condemned sin in the flesh"

We cannot put our confidence in the flesh, and that is why Christians must be tightly bound and look after each other. Interdependence is key. We do not increase sin to increase grace. Sin increased in Adam, but grace increases through Jesus so much that it overwhelms sin's negative judgment. By living a covenant relationship through faith in Jesus, you live the the spirit and are no longer subject to the judgment against your flesh. You will, in other words, become spiritual and righteous if you do this.
 
Last edited:

Jonathan Hoffman

Active Member
The phrase "free gift of righteousness" sounds both illogical and immoral to me. . . as I don;t think righteousness is something that can be attained without effort. It is not free. But so many of Paul's sayings sound illogical and a bit kooky to me.
 

Shermana

Heretic
The phrase "free gift of righteousness" sounds both illogical and immoral to me. . . as I don;t think righteousness is something that can be attained without effort. It is not free. But so many of Paul's sayings sound illogical and a bit kooky to me.

However, Paul says in Galatians that those who unrepentantly sin will not inherit the Kingdom of Heaven. So does that outright clash with this?

Does Paul blatantly contradict himself?

Is Paul saying there's no punishment for any sin anyone commits?
 

Jonathan Hoffman

Active Member
Hi Shermana,
At this point, I would tend to agree with Hermann Detering's view that the Pauline epistles were redacted by proto-orthodox interpolators who wanted to make Paul's thrology come more into line with the ideas of the original Jewish Xians.

Either that, or Paul had a split personality?
 

Ken Brown

Well-Known Member
The phrase "free gift of righteousness" sounds both illogical and immoral to me. . . as I don;t think righteousness is something that can be attained without effort. It is not free. But so many of Paul's sayings sound illogical and a bit kooky to me.

Hi Jonathan Hoffman, the irony of it is that by sinning, we fulfill righteousness. Righteousness is KEEPING the commands of the Torah, and every sinner did keep what the Torah required them to do when they failed in their doing of the Torah. You know that IF you fail in any of the commands of the Torah, the Torah has built in it a way for you to become righteous, and that way is for the sinner to sacrifice their sin offering. Once you do sacrifice that offering, you have, so to speak, a free gift of righteousness, only because you kept that command to sacrifice.

This was the Righteousness that the Apostle Paul spoke of, that all sinners (with the help of wicked men) did kill or slay their offering (Yeshua), by sinning. This Righteousness is not something we can boast about, rather it is a Righteousness that will cause all to mourn, as one mourns for an only child when they truly come to a knowledge of it. Hope this explanation helps you better understand the Apostle Paul. KB
 

Jonathan Hoffman

Active Member
Hi Ken,
Well, I wouldn't use the words "free gift", but Torah keepers who sometimes sin can always repent of their sin as David did. . . and return to the path of Torah. But the problem with Paul is that he says the Torah is abolished in favor of the "law of faith".
Best,
Jon
 

Ken Brown

Well-Known Member
Hi Ken,
Well, I wouldn't use the words "free gift", but Torah keepers who sometimes sin can always repent of their sin as David did. . . and return to the path of Torah. But the problem with Paul is that he says the Torah is abolished in favor of the "law of faith".
Best,
Jon

Hi Jonathan, the Apostle Paul is difficult to follow, but he had a special insight INTO the Torah (probably because of his studying under Gamaliel), and his ability to see how the division or wall that separated the Jew from the Gentile was abolished in the fact that both Jew and Gentile became DOERS of the Torah BY sinning. You see, the enmity (hostility) between Jew and Gentile no longer stood when you started looking at the Torah and it's Spiritual Fulfillment. Through the Cross (Yeshua's Sacrifice), both Jew and Gentile became Spiritual Doers of the Torah, and this happened because BOTH were transgressors of the Torah according to the letter. Transgressing the Torah according to the letter, actually is turned INTO a Spiritual Fulfillment of the Torah through OUR acceptance of Yeshua being OUR Sacrifice. In Paul's day, for the most part, Judaism rejected this belief, and stumbled over the fact that a man could fulfill the role of being a Spiritual Sacrifice. I'm suspecting that today, in our timeframe, Judaism WILL be the TRUE believers in Yeshua, and traditional christianity will reject Him (sort of a reversal of roles). Hope this helps. KB
 

Jonathan Hoffman

Active Member
Hi Jonathan, the Apostle Paul is difficult to follow, but he had a special insight INTO the Torah (probably because of his studying under Gamaliel), and his ability to see how the division or wall that separated the Jew from the Gentile was abolished in the fact that both Jew and Gentile became DOERS of the Torah BY sinning. You see, the enmity (hostility) between Jew and Gentile no longer stood when you started looking at the Torah and it's Spiritual Fulfillment. Through the Cross (Yeshua's Sacrifice), both Jew and Gentile became Spiritual Doers of the Torah, and this happened because BOTH were transgressors of the Torah according to the letter. Transgressing the Torah according to the letter, actually is turned INTO a Spiritual Fulfillment of the Torah through OUR acceptance of Yeshua being OUR Sacrifice. In Paul's day, for the most part, Judaism rejected this belief, and stumbled over the fact that a man could fulfill the role of being a Spiritual Sacrifice. I'm suspecting that today, in our timeframe, Judaism WILL be the TRUE believers in Yeshua, and traditional christianity will reject Him (sort of a reversal of roles). Hope this helps. KB

Sorry Ken, but this is all mumbo jumbo to me and many others.

"DOERS of the Torah BY sinning" ??? That makes absolutely no sense. A doer of the Torah would be just the opposite. Obeying the Torah means not sinning!
I think Paul is either a very confused person or his words have been redacted so often very little of the Paulines make sense.
 

Ken Brown

Well-Known Member
Sorry Ken, but this is all mumbo jumbo to me and many others.

"DOERS of the Torah BY sinning" ??? That makes absolutely no sense. A doer of the Torah would be just the opposite. Obeying the Torah means not sinning!
I think Paul is either a very confused person or his words have been redacted so often very little of the Paulines make sense.

Hi Jonathan, it only makes sense if you look at the Torah Spiritually. Paul said that the Torah is Spiritual (Rom 7:14), and those who believe or walk according to the Spiritual Keeping of the Torah will be righteous (Rom 8:1-4), in fact, they have FULFILLED the righteous requirement of the Torah, by killing their sin offering through disobedience to Moses. Yeshua said to those who were sinning, "Why are you trying to kill Me," (John 7:19). Sinning or breaking the commands of Moses (The Torah) KILLS Yeshua (He is the Word of Elohim, and by sinning, you in effect are putting the Word to death). But the Good News is, that sin is turned INTO righteousness (the sinner sacrificing their offering), and it is all a Free Gift. It just takes the sinner to confess and believe that they did kill the Holy One of Israel (with the help of wicked men-Acts 2:22-23). KB
 

Jonathan Hoffman

Active Member
Sorry Ken, That still makes no sense to me. It is too vague and abstract. I suggest you define your terms and give examples for what you are trying to convey. And above all, how does a DOER of the Torah commit sin? The Torah was given to humans as a gude for a good life. It's kinda like an Owners Manual for humans. Obeying Torah gives us a good life and make for a harmonious society. Disobeying the Toran brings sorrow. Kinda like not changing your oil in your car: it will bring you sorrow. Read Deut 28
All the best!
Jon
 

Shermana

Heretic
Hi Jonathan, it only makes sense if you look at the Torah Spiritually. Paul said that the Torah is Spiritual (Rom 7:14), and those who believe or walk according to the Spiritual Keeping of the Torah will be righteous (Rom 8:1-4), in fact, they have FULFILLED the righteous requirement of the Torah, by killing their sin offering through disobedience to Moses. Yeshua said to those who were sinning, "Why are you trying to kill Me," (John 7:19). Sinning or breaking the commands of Moses (The Torah) KILLS Yeshua (He is the Word of Elohim, and by sinning, you in effect are putting the Word to death). But the Good News is, that sin is turned INTO righteousness (the sinner sacrificing their offering), and it is all a Free Gift. It just takes the sinner to confess and believe that they did kill the Holy One of Israel (with the help of wicked men-Acts 2:22-23). KB

So by that logic, you're saying that if a person goes and commits adultery and steals and maybe murders a few people, gets into witchcraft, and defrauds people, his sin is turned into righteousness by repenting? So is he better off than someone who never committed those things?

Hebrews 10:26-29 says that anyone who continues to sin after receiving knowledge of the truth has nothing but fiery indignation to look forward to.
 

Ken Brown

Well-Known Member
So by that logic, you're saying that if a person goes and commits adultery and steals and maybe murders a few people, gets into witchcraft, and defrauds people, his sin is turned into righteousness by repenting? So is he better off than someone who never committed those things?

Hebrews 10:26-29 says that anyone who continues to sin after receiving knowledge of the truth has nothing but fiery indignation to look forward to.

Hi Shermana, I know this seems foreign to you, and it's not exactly how you have stated above in purple. Everyone's sin is turned INTO a Spiritual doing of the Torah, in the Sacrifice of Yeshua. Our sin is what caused His suffering and death, and our sin (through no conscience effort on our part) is turned INTO a fulfillment of accomplishing the Just Requirement of the Torah...which is "sinner, sacrifice for your sin." But it is a matter of "seeing" and "believing" that Yeshua is YOUR Spiritual Sacrifice, and not some 4 legged animal. This Grace (the free gift of righteousness), is given to ALL sinners, and it is just a matter of faith to believe in it. The purpose of this Grace is to TURN sinners FROM their sin (who in their right mind will continue in sin so that Grace can abound)? The knowledge of the truth is that we ALL murdered the Holy One of Israel, by sinning, and that sin becomes righteousness in our doing of what the Torah required us to do for that sin...which is sacrifice. And this is why our righteousness is as a menstrual cloth...we have the blood of Yeshua all over us...we shed His innocent blood.

Shermana, do you have an alternate explanation for the gift of righteousness? What did Paul mean, "but the free gift is of many offences unto justification?" What I have stated in the above paragraph is just an amplification of Paul's statement. The free gift of righteousness is the result of many offences. Why is this so hard to see? KB
 
Top