The Neo Nerd
Well-Known Member
What evidences do you have which make you to believe that Odin is just a myth,
aside from the fact that you cant see him by your eyes.
aside from the fact that you cant see him by your eyes.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm confused. Most of the Pagan gods are understood to be manifest in nature, not transcending it. The anthropomorphized vision of the gods are just that, but they represent real forces and powers that unequivocally exist in the world (e.g., the wind, poetic inspiration, love, etc.). Odin is a culturally specific mythopoetic interpretation of aspects of reality.
Modernly, sure they can be seen at metaphorical, but they used to be believed in.
What? Is the question too hard?Is this a reply to: http://www.religiousforums.com/foru...34-do-atheists-have-strong-evidences-god.html
If so just debate it there?
What? Is the question too hard?
I find your comments on this forum really laughable and ridiculous
was i talking to you.. Nop3..
I don't belief in it because the evidence of that is my holy-book happy now?
To be serious its illogical to belief that God can be seen or touched i think it will make him automatically not a god like Odin and certainly if he is hes own creation a (human).
What evidences do you have which make you to believe that Odin is just a myth,
aside from the fact that you cant see him by your eyes.
I'm confused. Most of the Pagan gods are understood to be manifest in nature, not transcending it. The anthropomorphized vision of the gods are just that, but they represent real forces and powers that unequivocally exist in the world (e.g., the wind, poetic inspiration, love, etc.). Odin is a culturally specific mythopoetic interpretation of aspects of reality.
My God provides me a personal relationship with himself. And if through my personal relationship with my God he tells me that all other god's are fake and made up, then that is the evidence that I need that Odin doesn't exist.
reach:
Are there any good books or articles on this topic? It is an area of theology/religion which very much interests me.I'm not convinced that our ancestors interpreted their mythopoetic narratives in the literal fashion that you seem to be suggesting. Belief stories and narratives that explain truths about reality is still a type of believing. Most of what I've read suggests Pagan mythology was never intended to be taken literally, nor was it taken as such by its believers back in the day. Mythological literalism is a fairly modern phenomena.
Usually a myth is defined by a lack of evidence. If there were evidence it would be considered history.
There is no evidence that Odin is around today. As far as I am concerned the myths about Odin reflect an ancient reality and are not fiction.
The gods were just men with longer lives and more power than other men. Worshipping men seems like a lesson in futility (more so when they aren't even around).
My God provides me a personal relationship with himself. And if through my personal relationship with my God he tells me that all other god's are fake and made up, then that is the evidence that I need that Odin doesn't exist.
reach:
I agree. I've read various Pagan myths aswell as commentaries on them and the relationship between the people and the deities seems to have been much more poetic than the current somewhat black-and-white, Greek style rational thinking that's taken over the religious thought (this mainly in the West, of course). My favourite example is from the Mesopotamian mythology, there Babylon was thought to be the city of the gods at the same time as it was the city of mortals. They had yearly rituals to celebrate this, with people impersonating the gods and all that. I really like the way the sacred and mundane has been thought to mix together so tightly it's sometimes been impossible to even attempt to separate them.I'm not convinced that our ancestors interpreted their mythopoetic narratives in the literal fashion that you seem to be suggesting. Belief stories and narratives that explain truths about reality is still a type of believing. Most of what I've read suggests Pagan mythology was never intended to be taken literally, nor was it taken as such by its believers back in the day. Mythological literalism is a fairly modern phenomena.