• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How many fossils would it take to "prove" the theory of evolution beyond a reasonable doubt?

Dan From Smithville

Dan From Smithville

Monsters! Monsters from the id! Forbidden Planet
Staff member
Premium Member
Subduction Zone said:
I didn't do any name calling. You need to learn the difference. Name calling is when one makes claims that one cannot support.




No. So far you have failed at being an honest interlocutor. You need to learn what is and what is not evidence. Then you can demand it.


Wow! That has to be the first time somebody misspelled "scientist" by calling them "evolutionists". The reason that you cannot claim to have scientists is because even the people that understand the sciences have to swear that they will not use the scientific method when they work at places like Answers in Genesis. One of the big reasons that creationists lose at law suits is because they lack evidence.


No, that was written between 500 and 600 BCE. During the Babylonian captivity. But even by your "Moses wrote it" nonsense (Moses is just another fictional character in the Bible) it is not eyewitness testimony. It is the myth as your mythical character heard it. Moses was not there. There is no indication that he even heard it from God, in which case it would still be only hearsay.

So even by your standards you do not have "eyewitness evidence".

I don't have to. If you cannot follow a conversation when a post is broken up that is your problem, Not mine.


Yes you do. You are probably unaware of when the mistake of interpreting Genesis literally first began in the US.


Not me.


No, now you are being dishonest again. She is actually a homerun. You cannot deny scientific evidence. You have to prove it to be wrong. You forget already. This is why you have to learn what scientific evidence is.


Nope. one has to break one's god's rules to sin..

The speed of light was never "changed". You are now at a fifth grade science level. The first measurement s were rather crude estimates. As time went on and our technology improved the measurements got more and more accurate. That is how science always works.
Click to expand...
It is as if all the literalist creationist tropes are being applied in one fell swoop.

I did not see any instance of you name calling here.

It is amusing to watch.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
dwb001 said:
In Post 317 you called the people I supposedly listen to as idiots an liars.

Sounds like name calling to me.
Click to expand...
If I see an aquatic bird with webbed feat that waddles and quacks and is all delicious dark meat is it name calling to call it a duck? What do you call an animal like this:

1700967876019.png
 
D

dwb001

Member
Dan From Smithville said:
I saw it. You were not called names in your own post and not in the one you were responding to.
Click to expand...
I never said I was. Get it straight.
Dan From Smithville said:
Not that you have shown room to call out anyone on this. If you feel you have been called names, you can report it if you choose to. I chose not to. Consider that.
Click to expand...
I didn't claim I was called names. You are not even representing this simple matter correctly
 
Dan From Smithville

Dan From Smithville

Monsters! Monsters from the id! Forbidden Planet
Staff member
Premium Member
dwb001 said:
I never said I was. Get it straight.

I didn't claim I was called names. You are not even representing this simple matter correctly
Click to expand...
I have indeed gotten it straight.

I don't really care anymore. I don't consider what you have to say has any value to me and can easily reject it all as unsupported claims without merit.
 
Dan From Smithville

Dan From Smithville

Monsters! Monsters from the id! Forbidden Planet
Staff member
Premium Member
Subduction Zone said:
You seemed to realize that I was right. You made no response to my post where I demonstrated your error.

Rabbit Season!

What am I saying? I have never eaten rabbit.
Click to expand...
Sure. Let's just stick with that story out of consideration of friendship. But if you had, I'm sure you would agree we are delicious.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Dan From Smithville said:
Sure. Let's just stick with that story out of consideration of friendship. But if you had, I'm sure you would agree we are delicious.
Click to expand...
I am not denying that, though I thought that it would make you uncomfortable. If I was to say that I did not like rabbit meat that would be a lie since I have not eaten then, just as it would be a lie if I said that I did like them.

I do know how birds got the name fowl. I used to hunt a little. Mostly squirrel and I would have to skin and gut those myself, no problem. One fall some neighbors can and asked if the could go duck hunting on your property down by the lake that we lived on. And we said "Sure". When the left they gave me a few ducks that they had shot. I only had to pluck and clean them (gut them). Plucking was no problem but when it came to gutting them I quickly found out why they were called "water foul". Oops, was that a misspelling? No, it looks quite accurate to me. They were still delicious.
 
McBell

McBell

mantra-chanting henotheistic snake handler
dwb001 said:
I didn't say that. You reduced my statements to a compound word of your own device.

How honest are you really being?
Click to expand...
My apologies.
I thought you meant Genesis from the Bible.
In which case, "GodDidIt" would be most accurate.

So which genesis were you referring to?
Please follow your own advice and be specific.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top