Evidence of NOAH's FLOOD

[Subduction Zone]

An elephant or a hippo have small tales. The dino in Job has a tale as large as a cedar tree.

I loved dinosaurs as a kid and that was a plant eating dino.

Nope. Nowhere does it say as large as a cedar. I can quote the Bible at you if you like.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Nope. Nowhere does it say as large as a cedar. I can quote the Bible at you if you like.

He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together. - Job 40:17

 

[Monty]

Your answer is muddled with sarcasm.

Job 40:15-19 describes a plant eating dinosaur, probably Brachiosaurus. Why?

Almost all ancient cultures have a record of a worldwide blood and a remnant saved on a great boat, sometimes 8 people. How do explain that?

There are about 30,000 figurines of dinosaurs date about 2500 years ago. How do you explain that?
How do you explain the carved Stegosaurus in that temple.

So how many Brachiosaurus and Stegosaurus have you seen, and have you eaten any, or did the author of Job 40:15-19 just describe a male elephant in must.

Which ancient cultures describe a worldwide flood, given that the bible only describes a local flood which was only 15 cubits high, and which drowned most of Noah's family, including his grandparents (Gen 5:27) and his widowed mother (Gen 5:28) and his aunts & uncles & cousins (Gen 5:26), and most of his brothers & sisters & nephews & nieces (Gen 5:30) and his other children born before and after his triplet sons on his boat (Gen 5:32). That particular flood, however, had no effect on Noah's brothers, Jabal & Jubal (Gen 4:20-21) and their families since they were living outside the flooded area, nor on our aborigines who arrived here over 50,000 years before Adam's grandmother was born.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

So how many Brachiosaurus and Stegosaurus have you seen, and have you eaten any, or did the author of Job 40:15-19 just describe a male elephant in must.

Which ancient cultures describe a worldwide flood, given that the bible only describes a local flood which was only 15 cubits high, and which drowned most of Noah's family, including his grandparents (Gen 5:27) and his widowed mother (Gen 5:28) and his aunts & uncles & cousins (Gen 5:26), and most of his brothers & sisters & nephews & nieces (Gen 5:30) and his other children born before and after his triplet sons on his boat (Gen 5:32). That particular flood, however, had no effect on Noah's brothers, Jabal & Jubal (Gen 4:20-21) and their families since they were living outside the flooded area, nor on our aborigines who arrived here over 50,000 years before Adam's grandmother was born.

So they wrote a book with the date 48000 BC?????
I have seen many depictions of dinosaurs. And yes that indeed was God described. I am thinking Brachiosaurus. You guessed the same i see.
And your fairy tale retell of the flood weird.

 

[Monty]

He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together. - Job 40:17

But a male elephant in musth has a large tail which can moveth into a cedar, and also another large tail which can moveth along the ground like a cedar, and the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.

 

[Subduction Zone]

He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together. - Job 40:17

There you go. See I told you that it does not say "as big as a cedar". Do you know how a cedar moves? I can move my finger like a cedar even though it is nowhere near as big. A hippos tail, if you slow it down, moves very similar to the way that a cedar moves.

Once again, who understood the Bible better, here is a hint, it was not you. "moves like a cedar" does not mean "as big as a cedar". You were listening to Liars For Jesus again, weren't you.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

There you go. See I told you that it does not say "as big as a cedar". Do you know how a cedar moves? I can move my finger like a cedar even though it is nowhere near as big. A hippos tail, if you slow it down, moves very similar to the way that a cedar moves.

Once again, who understood the Bible better, here is a hint, it was not you. "moves like a cedar" does not mean "as big as a cedar". You were listening to Liars For Jesus again, weren't you.

He moveth his tail like a cedar not like a wisp or swallow tale.

And of course you did not look up the rest of the description.

Job 40:15-24
15 Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox.
16 Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly.
17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.
18 His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron.
19 He is the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach unto him.
20 Surely the mountains bring him forth food, where all the beasts of the field play.
21 He lieth under the shady trees, in the covert of the reed, and fens.
22 The shady trees cover him with their shadow; the willows of the brook compass him about.
23 Behold, he drinketh up a river, and hasteth not: he trusteth that he can draw up Jordan into his mouth.
24 He taketh it with his eyes: his nose pierceth through snares.

 

[Subduction Zone]

But a male elephant in musth has a large tail which can moveth into a cedar, and also another large tail which can moveth along the ground like a cedar, and the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.

I am not sure if either of those two qualifies for the "sinews of his stones . .." part. But then for sure a brachiosaur would not qualify either. They all have internal testes.

 

[Monty]

So they wrote a book with the date 48000 BC?????
I have seen many depictions of dinosaurs. And yes that indeed was God described. I am thinking Brachiosaurus. You guessed the same i see.
And your fairy tale retell of the flood weird.

How many Brachiosaurus have you seen, and have you ever eaten any?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

How many Brachiosaurus have you seen, and have you ever eaten any?

I saw many of them in many depictions.

 

[Subduction Zone]

He moveth his tail like a cedar not like a wisp or swallow tale.

And of course you did not look up the rest of the description.

Job 40:15-24
15 Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox.
16 Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly.
17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.
18 His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron.
19 He is the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach unto him.
20 Surely the mountains bring him forth food, where all the beasts of the field play.
21 He lieth under the shady trees, in the covert of the reed, and fens.
22 The shady trees cover him with their shadow; the willows of the brook compass him about.
23 Behold, he drinketh up a river, and hasteth not: he trusteth that he can draw up Jordan into his mouth.
24 He taketh it with his eyes: his nose pierceth through snares.

There is nothing in there about size. It is only about how it moves.

All of the rest could easily apply to a hippo. And its tail does sway back and forth like a cedar does. You have no clue as to how a brachiosaurs tail moved. Odds are that it did not "move like a cedar".

 

[Subduction Zone]

How many Brachiosaurus have you seen, and have you ever eaten any?

Sadly I have never eaten that dinosaur.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

There is nothing in there about size. It is only about how it moves.

All of the rest could easily apply to a hippo. And its tail does sway back and forth like a cedar does. You have no clue as to how a brachiosaurs tail moved. Odds are that it did not "move like a cedar".

Brachiosaurus for sure. God calls is behemoth.

 

[YoursTrue]

I wasn't there at the time. So I can only theorize. Chimps are transitioning now?

I'm asking you.

 

[YoursTrue]

Because you claim that triticale and the dinosaurs were created 6000 years ago, and that 14 of each species of dinosaur were on Noah's boat less than 4000 years ago.

He does? I didn't see that. Maybe he does. But he's (not sure he or she) so on the spot about so many things.

 

[Monty]

He moveth his tail like a cedar not like a wisp or swallow tale.

And of course you did not look up the rest of the description.

Job 40:15-24
15 Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox.
16 Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly.
17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.
18 His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron.
19 He is the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach unto him.
20 Surely the mountains bring him forth food, where all the beasts of the field play.
21 He lieth under the shady trees, in the covert of the reed, and fens.
22 The shady trees cover him with their shadow; the willows of the brook compass him about.
23 Behold, he drinketh up a river, and hasteth not: he trusteth that he can draw up Jordan into his mouth.
24 He taketh it with his eyes: his nose pierceth through snares.

IOW the author is obviously describing the trunk of an elephant which can moveth like a cedar, and can reach and pick leaves from a cedar to eat as well as grass as an ox.
How many of your dinosaurs can reach cedar leaves and pick them with their tails?

 

[Monty]

He does? I didn't see that. Maybe he does. But he's (not sure he or she) so on the spot about so many things.

So when was triticale created, or did it evolve from wheat and rye?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

So when was triticale created, or did it evolve from wheat and rye?

It is just a hybrid created by intelligent scientists.

 

[blü 2]

I have already put up 2 infallible proofs that the Bible is the word of God, that God cerated everything in 6 days about 6000 years ago, without evolution and falsified billions of years also.

I can't recall seeing more fallible "infallible" "proofs" of anything. You appear not to understand your own claims well enough to understand how untenable they are.

I have given my challenge that no one has met.

Impartial onlookers might say instead that your arguments have crashed and burnt even before they could take off. They'd like remark the way you don't give reasoned replies to criticisms of them, for example, just assertions.

I have my many required questions which no one has an answer to any.

I'm one of those who have answered your questions. So please stick to the facts.

And look at the way you avoid answering my questions to you, such as how your researches are progressing into how miracles actually work.
I

I have shown advanced scientific knowledge from the Bible and very many amazing predictions from the Bible that have come true in exact detail and exact timing the have come true in our very time.

It appears to me that you haven't even understood what the bible actually says. When I pointed out its cosmology to you, you didn't read the passages I quoted to you, nor try to understand them, nor examine the question as to whether I was right and you were wrong and if so why.

And you'll recall you were unable to quote passages that supported your own claims, though you asserted they were in there somewhere you couldn't actually point to.00

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I can't recall seeing more fallible "infallible" "proofs" of anything. You appear not to understand your own claims well enough to understand how untenable they are.


Impartial onlookers might say instead that your arguments have crashed and burnt even before they could take off. They'd like remark the way you don't give reasoned replies to criticisms of them, for example, just assertions.


I'm one of those who have answered your questions. So please stick to the facts.

And look at the way you avoid answering my questions to you, such as how your researches are progressing into how miracles actually work.
I

It appears to me that you haven't even understood what the bible actually says. When I pointed out its cosmology to you, you didn't read the passages I quoted to you, nor try to understand them, nor examine the question as to whether I was right and you were wrong and if so why.

And you'll recall you were unable to quote passages that supported your own claims, though you asserted they were in there somewhere you couldn't actually point to.00

MI and Non contradiction are 2 infallible ways to prove something and I did it with both.