That would apply to the left as well.I argue that the term "right" is virtually useless.
If a regime is authoritarian, then it should be
labelled with clarity, eg, "authoritarian", "fascist",
"oppressive", "dictatorial".
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That would apply to the left as well.I argue that the term "right" is virtually useless.
If a regime is authoritarian, then it should be
labelled with clarity, eg, "authoritarian", "fascist",
"oppressive", "dictatorial".
Russia gave democracy a shot, and they elected an authoritarian.
Yes, so tis best to avoid ambiguous politicallyThat would apply to the left as well.
I read in War's Dark Shadow like 30 or 40 years ago. Those poor Russians are used to living lean whether they wanted to or not.Bread delivery is scheduled for later next month.
Some here argue against it, but I observeI read in War's Dark Shadow like 30 or 40 years ago. Those poor Russians are used to living lean whether they wanted to or not.
Do you think the election was rigged?When was that? Was it a free election? Was it known back then that he would be a dictator?
You have left authoritarian/right authoritarian, and left libertarian/right libertarian.I argue that the term "right" is virtually useless.
If a regime is authoritarian, then it should be
labelled with clarity, eg, "authoritarian", "fascist",
"oppressive", "dictatorial".
I read a joke from Ukraine about how they are running out of popcorn watching the drama unfold in Russia.
A problem is that liberals are fond of usingYou have left authoritarian/right authoritarian, and left libertarian/right libertarian.
Maybe the political compass should've been a cube instead of a square - add a third axis.
Do you think the election was rigged?
If so, based upon what evidence?
I don't trust them either.I don't trust any of Russia's elections to be free, but I don't know which election was being referenced in the post I responded to. I would need to know that before making a more definitive comment.
A two party dictatorship.The United States are under a dictatorship too.
It's a plutocratic dictatorship.
I don't know that it is so inaccurate as to not be useful in describing things.Yes, so tis best to avoid ambiguous politically
loaded terms that suggest something inaccurate.
The extremist minorities with loud voices on either side.A two party dictatorship.
Russia. Where they got all their gear.Wonder where Wagnor is getting the ammo?
The problem arrives when lefties callI don't know that it is so inaccurate as to not be useful in describing things.
Both ends have their liberty and oppression.
There's lines for toilet paper, not bullets.Wonder where Wagnor is getting the ammo?
I agree with that.The problem arrives when lefties call
all authoritarian regimes "right wing".
"Right" is redundant in one sense,
but the opposite in another.
It adds nothing...except sanctimony by
those who like demonizing conservatives.