Really? You did not understand your error? Once again, the argument from ignorance applies when one only has a lack of evidence against.
Why is that so hard for you to understand? I presented evidence that supported my claim. Therefore I was not merely saying "Well , dug gee Tennessee, there is no evidence against my beliefs". When one makes that claim that is often because they have made the error of using an unfalsifiable claim. To have evidence one needs a testable hypothesis in the first place.
Argument from Ignorance
'Description: The assumption of a conclusion or fact based
primarily on lack of evidence to the contrary. Usually best described by, “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” '
<bolding mine>
My argument did not even refer to a claim that there was no evidence against it. My argument was once again based upon evidence. Your argument was solely based upon a lack of evidence again.
I can from all sorts of claims that have no evidence against them. And I predict that you would reject each and every one of them.