That’s not a hypothesis.
A hypothesis isn’t a one-liner.
A hypothesis required a fuller and more detail explanation.
Your one-liner is merely a baseless assertion....which is pretty pathetic, because it isn’t an explanation.
A hypothesis isn’t something that you just think of, dream of or make something up while getting high in acid trip.
A hypothesis still required preliminary observations of the phenomena, before you would even start writing up hypothesis.
The hypothesis should be based on the initial or preliminary observations, explain in details on
- WHAT the phenomena is and
- HOW the phenomena works.
Your phenomena is this “Intelligent Designer”. You haven’t observe this Designer.
If life was “caused” by this Designer, then you would need evidence of this “cause”, and since you assert that this cause is your Designer, then you would need physical evidence to show that this Designer exist...which you clearly left out below in your so-called “Evidence”:
Where are your evidence for the DESIGNER?
There are none, so basically you have no hypothesis, no evidence for your “cause” being the Designer, and, so, you really haven’t falsify anything at all in your ludicrous attempt at producing a hypothesis.
Your entire post is absurd, ignorant and dishonest.
If you had presented your post before peer reviewed, everyone would have laughed at your presentation of “hypothesis”.
Clearly you don’t know what a hypothesis, you don’t know what falsification is and you don’t know what evidence is.
All you have shown that your high school “prize” (gold metal) in science is nothing more than an empty boast of your superior intellect.
I see need no intellect at all.