ElishaElijah
Return
Exactly what the government has been doing. Open your eyes. They abuse “science” and use it as a cover.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
God is disproven by science? Really?
- Thread starter MrIntelligentDesign
- Start date
I believe the government about 1,000% more than I believe religious conspiracy theory nonsense
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
The man has no shame. He has to have some intelligence, but he has no qualms about lying for Jesus. He is a master of reediting interviews. What one does is look for the answer that one wants and then in post ask the question that you want answered that way. If you ever watch some of his interviews you will see constant jump cuts. And every jump cut is an opportunity to edit it the way that you want, and answers that often don't quite fit the questions.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, what was wrong was the expectation of people that were a huge part of the problem. And then they hypocritically wonder why the disease has not gone away.
By the way, the Covid19 virus and all of its variants. A perfect example of evolution in action.
ElishaElijah
Return
What is religious conspiracy theory?
Is this true or false?
Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the most cited experts in his field, who has successfully treated over 2000 COVID patients by using a protocol of early treatment (which the so-called experts completely ignored), has been the victim of a particularly vicious assault by those benefiting financially from the vaccines. He has published his results in peer reviewed journals, reporting an 80% reduction in hospitalizations and a 75% reduction in deaths by using early treatment.[44] Despite this, he is under an unrelenting series of attacks by the information controllers, none of which have treated a single patient.
Neither Anthony Fauci, the CDC, WHO nor any medical governmental establishment has ever offered any early treatment other than Tylenol, hydration and call an ambulance once you have difficulty breathing. This is unprecedented in the entire history of medical care as early treatment of infections is critical to saving lives and preventing severe complications. Not only have these medical organizations and federal lapdogs not even suggested early treatment, they attacked anyone who attempted to initiate such treatment with all the weapons at their disposal—loss of license, removal of hospital privileges, shaming, destruction of reputations and even arrest.[2]
So, if people were really interested in science, medicine and the health and welfare of people then why not let the doctors treat patients freely?
Last edited:
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
When you supposedly have evidence of this nautre you need to post it. I have server doubts about almost all of your claims about this man. Yes he is a doctor. He was well respected. But not in virology. He is not an expert in the field. He has writtten clearly fasle claims. He appears to be a conspiracy theorist. He has made claims but I do not see anyone properly supporting them.
Until you post something of substance the reaction of the medical community to him is not a conspiracy.
Peter A. McCullough - Wikipedia
Hydroxychloroquine - Wikipedia
False
So to answer your first question. Everything below here....
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Yes, I should have done that. But I do like to give people a chance to support thier claims. I do not remember one time that he has supported his.
ElishaElijah
Return
So you believe Fauci 1,000 percent and the government with Covid and that the vaccines, masks were effective at preventing the spread and infection of Covid, that Remdesivir was the proper protocol for hospitals to use on patients?
That frontline doctors who were successful with early treatment protocol that had a different approach to Covid should’ve been censored.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Please ease up on the black and white fallacies.
And you have not presented any peer reviewed literature supporting your claim about front line doctors.
One thing that you may not realize is taht your heroes may have fudged the data a bit. If one can keep the elderly out of one's data base it can looks as if one has a much better than average batting average. The old were particularly vulnerable to Covid so if you have a samle with the old it can look like you know what you are doing when you really do not.
You obviously didn't read my post, I said I believe the government 1,000% more than I believe religious conspiracy theory nonsense. I don't have a great deal of faith in governments so that should tell you what I think about religious conspiracy theories.
ElishaElijah
Return
I read it but don’t see this as a religious issue. Science and medicine aren’t black and white but only has one viewpoint at the moment in our society and any dissenting view other than the viewpoint being pushed by those who want to “control the narrative” are censored.
This is why I think you are being manipulated and are not as free a thinker as you see yourself.
Never said I was a free thinker, I follow where the evidence leads.
ElishaElijah
Return
Not what I see
From what I've seen I find that comforting.
ElishaElijah
Return
It shouldn’t. Who funds the science? The government you don’t have faith in. And they only have one view. That’s your evidence
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
That is only because you refuse to learn what qualifies as evidence. You have taken yourself out of any debaate that involves scientific evidence.
Ummm ok, I'm done, I wish you well with your conspiracies.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Ooh, not a good combination. Conspiracy theories and projection.
Scientists tend to want to know the truth. If they want money they could have have earned several times as much working for some sort of industry. Scientific research is not a well paying job. So "The gubmint pays them!" argument is not going to get you anywhere.
Worse it appears that you would "take the money and run". Your baseless accustation tells us more about you than it tells us about scientists.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I may have shown that he was wrong one time to many. He does not appear to want to debate with me any longer. I have nothing better to do.