You are right. I did not see anything. Of any claimed science, there was nothing to see.You had never seen anything
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You are right. I did not see anything. Of any claimed science, there was nothing to see.You had never seen anything
Good luck.Told you a few times I read it. I'm trying to discuss it with you but you refuse. How about answering my questions on your work.
Did you defeat the others in debate as well? There isn't a record of those debates is there?I do not even care the bad reviewer... I defeated him in a debate, he revenged by writing bad review...lol!
I read his post and several others asking you to explain what you did and what it means. I did not see anything in his questions that I would consider derails the thread. In fact, those questions would clarify things. It seems to me, that failure to clarify, explain and answer clearly and directly questions put to you does more to derail the thread than a few egg jokes.
Did you defeat the others in debate as well? There isn't a record of those debates is there?
Boy do I have egg on my face.To be fair they were bad egg jokes.
I saw several videos and beg to differ.He claims to have never lost a debate using his new intelligent design discovery.
That is right. You linked some of them.He claims to have never lost a debate using his new intelligent design discovery.
By this point, I have read a fair amount of his work and find it incomprehensible myself. Though, I am sure that is all my fault.Love the: "Almost incomprehensible, written by a semi-literate buffoon" review.
I had written many articles asking for rebuttal. They could not, even you all here in this thread.Did you defeat the others in debate as well? There isn't a record of those debates is there?
By this point, I have read a fair amount of his work and find it incomprehensible myself. Though, I am sure that is all my fault.
I had written many articles asking for rebuttal. They could not, even you all here in this thread.
Can you rebut this falsification article?
EVOLUTION HAS BEEN FALSIFIED!
Any bets on who this "reviewer" might be:Love the: "Almost incomprehensible, written by a semi-literate buffoon" review.
Yes. I will use my famous egg/toilet paper experiment to prove ID is false.Can you rebut this falsification article?
Lol!Any bets on who this "reviewer" might be:
]
William H. Smith Jr.
5.0 out of 5 stars God's Fringerprints
Reviewed in the United States on April 20, 2015
Verified Purchase
Great book with undeniable science. Easy to read even for laymen!
Doubt it is Mr.ID himself, but this clearly is a bot/troll that just 5-stars anything anti-evolution. Sad.
Not directly relevant but this review reminded me of some previous creationist antics:
Anyone remember when a glitchy Canadian Amazon site accidentally revealed the real names (or emails, can't remember) of all book reviewers and it was discovered that Bill Dembski had written glowing reviews of his own book under several pseudonyms?
Also, acolytes of Walter ReMine and ReMine himself used to boast that his book was in the libraries of major universities so it was taken seriously - then it came out that ReMine and other had purchased large quantities of his book and then gifted copies to university libraries...
I am a discoverer who discovered intelligence, thus, I have the right to use my terminologies and explain them.Yes. You're just changing the names of well established terms and making up words. When asked to explain something you try and divert or don't reply. If you're serious about this have an adult discussion.
Everyone that has read your articles has rebutted them.I had written many articles asking for rebuttal. They could not, even you all here in this thread.
Can you rebut this falsification article?
EVOLUTION HAS BEEN FALSIFIED!
I am a discoverer who discovered intelligence, thus, I have the right to use my terminologies and explain them.
EVOLUTION HAS BEEN FALSIFIED!
That is the problem. You do not explain terminology or anything else. Even when asked repeatedly to explain.I am a discoverer who discovered intelligence, thus, I have the right to use my terminologies and explain them.
EVOLUTION HAS BEEN FALSIFIED!
That is the problem. You do not explain terminology or anything else. Even when asked repeatedly to explain.