I already somewhat agreed in this - but the question was EXPLAINING the motions in the Solar System and not DESCRIBING it by math.
By "EXPLAIN" you mean make up a bunch of stories with nothing to support them, not even mathematics. To get a ship from the earth to the moon and back took a lot more than explaining. It took understanding the force of gravity and the mathematics to exploit it.
I can say NASA used Universal Farts to guide the ship from the earth to the moon and back. If I have the formulas relating to the force of various Universal Farts, I can use maths to calculate the propellant requirements to accomplish said task. I could then also model the motions of the solar system bodies. But there is no math to use for Universal Farts. Nor, it seems, is there any for your EM.
Your EM is like Universal Farts.
Well thanks at least for cherry picking a sentens in where they´re asking into a cosmological problem
Cherry-picking? Nonsense. That would mean that I read all the articles that you linked to and selected just one ridiculous segment. What actually happened is that I glanced through one article, saw something that looked silly, and posted it for your comment.
In any case, you didn't comment on the articles. You didn't select portions to support your ideas. Did you bother reading the articles, or did you just post the links in the hopes of impressing someone?
Well, can consensus gravity cosmology explain this misalignment of planetary orbits? I don´t think so.
What misalignment? Even if there were a minor "I dunno" in the current theories does not mean that Gravity is wrong and your EM is right.
You, and your fellow EMers, would get a lot more traction if you could model the solar system using EM. But you can't. Really basic stuff, and you can't do it using EM.