• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Defending religious liberty with violence

Cooky

Veteran Member
If some regime tried to seriously limit your religious liberty would you use violence against them? And by violence, I mean targeted lethal violence.

I would, as a matter of principle, even if it probably wouldn’t achieve much.

I think it’s a God-given right to defend with violence the freedom you have to practice your faith.

And by seriously limiting religious liberty I don’t mean (for example) not allowing Niqab to be worn in public or not allowing crucifixes to be displayed in the workplace, I mean more fundamental things, such as being forbidden to assemble, associate, worship and believe.

I’m talking about practicing resistance against genuine oppression, not secularism.

What do people think?

I say yes, I would.

I don't think this imaginary scenario is a good mental exercise to contemplate on.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Better yet...
Let the oppressors die before submitting to the religion of peace.

Gen Geo Patton said it best....
The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other ba$tard die for his.

44 kg of fightin' chinkette uber islam!
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
I know, let's all get drunk first and then talk about this! :)

giphy-4.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:

WhyIsThatSo

Well-Known Member
If some regime tried to seriously limit your religious liberty would you use violence against them? And by violence, I mean targeted lethal violence.

I would, as a matter of principle, even if it probably wouldn’t achieve much.

I think it’s a God-given right to defend with violence the freedom you have to practice your faith.

And by seriously limiting religious liberty I don’t mean (for example) not allowing Niqab to be worn in public or not allowing crucifixes to be displayed in the workplace, I mean more fundamental things, such as being forbidden to assemble, associate, worship and believe.

I’m talking about practicing resistance against genuine oppression, not secularism.

What do people think?

I say yes, I would.

"Put your sword back in it's place", Jesus said to him, " For all who draw the sword will die by the sword " ( Mathew 26:52 )

" But when you pray, enter into your inner room ( NO CHURCH ), shut your door, and pray to your Father who is unseen. And your
Father. who sees what is done IN SECRET will reward you " ( Mathew 6:6 )
 

Saint Frankenstein

Wanderer From Afar
Premium Member
If some regime tried to seriously limit your religious liberty would you use violence against them? And by violence, I mean targeted lethal violence.

I would, as a matter of principle, even if it probably wouldn’t achieve much.

I think it’s a God-given right to defend with violence the freedom you have to practice your faith.

And by seriously limiting religious liberty I don’t mean (for example) not allowing Niqab to be worn in public or not allowing crucifixes to be displayed in the workplace, I mean more fundamental things, such as being forbidden to assemble, associate, worship and believe.

I’m talking about practicing resistance against genuine oppression, not secularism.

What do people think?

I say yes, I would.
Yes.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
"Put your sword back in it's place", Jesus said to him, " For all who draw the sword will die by the sword " ( Mathew 26:52 )

" But when you pray, enter into your inner room ( NO CHURCH ), shut your door, and pray to your Father who is unseen. And your
Father. who sees what is done IN SECRET will reward you " ( Mathew 6:6 )


So because one might die fighting for what you believe,
you must do nothing?

In the event, the context of the supposed jesus-saying is
that if you take up arms against the Roman Empire, you
will be killed.
 

McBell

mantra-chanting henotheistic snake handler
"If you confuse yourselves, you will be confused. If you blind yourselves, you will be blinded.
You are drunk, but not from wine. You stagger, but not from liquor " ( Isaiah 29:9 )
I was hungry, then I ate a Snickers bar, then I was no longer hunger.
 

WhyIsThatSo

Well-Known Member
So because one might die fighting for what you believe,
you must do nothing?

In the event, the context of the supposed jesus-saying is
that if you take up arms against the Roman Empire, you
will be killed.
I guess jokes are beyond you, eh?

" I started a joke, which started the whole world crying....
But I didn't see that the joke was on me..."
 
Top