No, not really. Experience hath taught me that a rational, civil debate on this tooic is impossible, due to the triggered True Believers, who charge into the topic with jihadist zeal.
you have a vivid imagination, if you 'see!' that, in the nearly 100 pages of this thread.
ONE STUDY, has been the centerpiece for over 30 pages, and the 'evidence' from it has not even been analyzed or examined, except by me. Assertions and outrage seem preferred to scientific analysis.
I've considered you that for some time now.. likely since our initial exchange.
Progressive indoctrinees usually, and typically, lash out in unscientific, hysterical outrage, instead of calm, evidentiary based reason.
I don't obsess over the hecklers, just point out that this is their tactic, to deflect attention from the impotence of the science and reason. Seldom has anyone addressed my rebuttals, and NEVER on this chimp/human computer statistics study. Mostly i get jeering and ridicule, or indignation, like from you, here, as a substitute for a reasoned rebuttal.
It is the essence of ad hominem, to direct your comments 'to the man', instead of to the topic.
My offer stands. If you wish to debate the science, and ditch the ad hom. I'm willing to do a 'reset', and start anew. But i have little hope of that either, as my offer usually falls on deaf ears, that prefer the joys of fallacy, to the mundane practice of reason.