• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Self-renunciation, learning to love, trust and follow a master teacher

Jim

Nets of Wonder
Note: I‘m not trying to reconcile belief systems. I’m not trying to find common ground between them. I’m opposed to that.

I think that in all the religions that have been associated with thriving civilizations, there is a story that the best life a person can live, for their own benefit and for the benefit of all people and of society, is in self-renunciation and learning to love, trust and follow a master teacher. Is there anyone else here who sees that?
 

The Reverend Bob

Fart Machine and Beastmaster
Are you disagreeing with what I said? Are you denying that all those religions tell that story?
Taoism does. And some aspects of Christianity believe that a person needs no other instructor but that of the Holy Spirit, that said master teachers came and went and now is the age of the Holy Spirit.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Note: I‘m not trying to reconcile belief systems. I’m not trying to find common ground between them. I’m opposed to that.

I think that in all the religions that have been associated with thriving civilizations, there is a story that the best life a person can live, for their own benefit and for the benefit of all people and of society, is in self-renunciation and learning to love, trust and follow a master teacher. Is there anyone else here who sees that?


I see that several followed Mao. The quest for
a Master is a fool's game.

I am not about to renunciationalize myself in any case.
 

Jim

Nets of Wonder
Taoism does. And some aspects of Christianity believe that a person needs no other instructor but that of the Holy Spirit, that said master teachers came and went and now is the age of the Holy Spirit.
Okay, I see your point then. I think that the need for a master teacher is a part of human nature and will always be a part of our relationship with God. The reason I think that is because I think that’s what my master teacher says. :smile: But I could be wrong. I’ve been wrong before. Anyway, the relationship with a master teacher can be indirect, but I think there have to be some people who are in a direct personal relationship with the master teacher.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Note: I‘m not trying to reconcile belief systems. I’m not trying to find common ground between them. I’m opposed to that.

I think that in all the religions that have been associated with thriving civilizations, there is a story that the best life a person can live, for their own benefit and for the benefit of all people and of society, is in self-renunciation and learning to love, trust and follow a master teacher. Is there anyone else here who sees that?
The master teacher part is not considered necessary in Hinduism.
 

Jim

Nets of Wonder
The master teacher part is not considered necessary in Hinduism.
I know that. Are you disagreeing with what I said? Are you denying that there is any story, anywhere in Hinduism, like the one I described?
 

TransmutingSoul

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Taoism does. And some aspects of Christianity believe that a person needs no other instructor but that of the Holy Spirit, that said master teachers came and went and now is the age of the Holy Spirit.

If one practices both those Faiths, can they not be traced back to a founder, even if one practices them not acknowledging the founder?

Example with Taoism

"Laozi, also rendered as Lao Tzu and Lao-Tze, was an ancient Chinese philosopher and writer. He is the reputed author of the Tao Te Ching, the founder of philosophical Taoism, and a deity in religious Taoism and traditional Chinese religions."

Thus there was reportably a teacher that founded this school of thought.

Regards Tony
 
Last edited:

Jim

Nets of Wonder
If one practices both those Faiths, can they not be traced back to a founder, even if one practices them not acknowledging the founder?

Example with Taoism

"Laozi, also rendered as Lao Tzu and Lao-Tze, was an ancient Chinese philosopher and writer. He is the reputed author of the Tao Te Ching, the founder of philosophical Taoism, and a deity in religious Taoism and traditional Chinese religions."

Thus there was a teacher that founded this school of thought.

Regards Tony
Actually I thought that Taoism might be an exception to what I’m saying. What I’m saying is more than just saying that there’s a founder. In the story I’m describing, there is a person for people to learn to love, trust and follow. Lao-Tzu might not fit that description.
 

The Reverend Bob

Fart Machine and Beastmaster
If one practices both those Faiths, can they not be traced back to a founder, even if one practices them not acknowledging the founder?

Example with Taoism

"Laozi, also rendered as Lao Tzu and Lao-Tze, was an ancient Chinese philosopher and writer. He is the reputed author of the Tao Te Ching, the founder of philosophical Taoism, and a deity in religious Taoism and traditional Chinese religions."

Thus there was a teacher that founded this school of thought.

Regards Tony
Lao Tzu is a founder of a school of philosophical Taoism not the founder of Taoism and I am more of a Yang Chu kinda guy and there is nothing within the Tao te Ching that cannot be taught by simple observation and natural instinct. The water teaches more about the Tao than a simple book if you know how to observe it
 

TransmutingSoul

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Actually I thought that Taoism might be an exception to what I’m saying. What I’m saying is more than just saying that there’s a founder. In the story I’m describing, there is a person for people to learn to love, trust and follow. Lao-Tzu might not fit that description.

That is very true. Frame of reference always blinds.

Regards Tony
 

TransmutingSoul

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Lao Tzu is a founder of a school of philosophical Taoism not the founder of Taoism and I am more of a Yang Chu kinda guy and there is nothing within the Tao te Ching that cannot be taught by simple observation and natural instinct. The water teaches more about the Tao than a simple book if you know how to observe it

I see Nature is a great teacher. As such I see great merit in many ancient cultures and their love and connection with creation.

Regards Tony
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
Sounds to me like we're talking about Discipleship when we mention "Masters". Discipleship is a view that works very well in people's minds, but leads to a lot of bad things in reality. It's probably why less Christian churches focus on Discipleship now.
 
Top