Atheism is ILLEGAL?

[lewisnotmiller]

Could it be said that Atheism is unconstitutional and illegal?

In some countries, sure. Not in the US though, if that's the country you're referring to. The countries that have made it illegal are ignorant and self-delusional, but they exist.

The terrorist ideology and doctrines?

So you think Australia, Norway and the Czech Republic are terrorist nations?

PREMISE: God means:

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident...

The Declaration of Independence: Full text

He made all gods same god [LordLaw of Nature & Nature's God]. (Quran 38:5)​

THEREFORE, the definition of Atheism:

atheism /ˈeɪθɪɪz(ə)m/
noun
disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of Nature's God.​

Atheism rejects public policy and the Constitution; of all countries.

The Declaration of Independence isn't even the Constitution of one country let alone all countries. This is a completely incorrect, misguided and...frankly...arrogant assertion.

Atheism rejects the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, The United Nation.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Atheism makes to comment towards anything at all, but indicates a lack of belief in gods. That's it.

It is the actus reus and mens rea of a criminal.

What a pile of insightless, self-serving and insulting drivel.

 

[Matheist]

When using the word "therefore", it should be accompanied by a logical argument.
You skipped that last part.

not at all...

 

[Revoltingest]

Yee was arrested and convicted of “wounding religious feelings” and “obscenity” in 2015 after he made a video mocking Christianity and Singapore’s founding father, Lee Kwan Yew. Though he was handed a jail sentence of multiple weeks. Singaporean Atheist Jailed for “Wounding Religious Feelings” Says Police Won’t Return His Property

I asked specifically about "here", ie, Ameristan, which you cited in the OP.
Certainly, there are oppressive theocracies who ruthlessly enforce religion.
No dispute about that.

 

[ChristineM]

Where did I said that? Prove it.. quote my comment.

and how can it be my opinion when it is your official definition of Atheism?

That is your Logic?




It is soon, many countries have made it as a Crime and Atheists in UK etc have been sentenced to prison. They are Criminals. It's good.

I am not searching through your hate threads just to satisfy your delusion. If i happen to see it i will show you.

Not my definition

Wrong,only a few scared and backward countries have made atheism a crime, and not soon in others. Atheists in the uk have not been imprisoned for being atheist but for committing crime in the same way that religious people have been imprisoned. If it were a crime to be atheist in the uk over 40% of the population would be locked up

 

[Matheist]

In some countries, sure. Not in the US though, if that's the country you're referring to. The countries that have made it illegal are ignorant and self-delusional, but they exist.



So you think Australia, Norway and the Czech Republic are terrorist nations?

The whole nation? You must be kidding.. lol

Internet Trolls can be Prosecuted Under Australian Law

The Declaration of Independence isn't even the Constitution of one country let alone all countries. This is a completely incorrect, misguided and...frankly...arrogant assertion.

Do you have any idea about public policy and the "interpretation methodology" etc?

Atheism makes to comment towards anything at all, but indicates a lack of belief in gods. That's it.

Is militant Atheist an Atheist?

What a pile of insightless, self-serving and insulting drivel.

Please bring evidence.

 

[Matheist]

I asked specifically about "here", ie, Ameristan, which you cited in the OP.
Certainly, there are oppressive theocracies who ruthlessly enforce religion.
No dispute about that.

So you are free to insult anyone who believes gods and religions in Ameristan? There is no morality in Ameristan?

 

[Revoltingest]

not at all...

What are the steps of reasoning leading from your premises to your conclusions?

 

[Matheist]

Not my definition

Therefore, you're not an Atheist.

What are you?

 

[Revoltingest]

So you are free to insult anyone who believes gods and religions in Ameristan?

I am.
This is just as you are free to insult them & us too.
It's legal speech.
Do you oppose this liberty?

There is no morality in Ameristan?

There are many moralities.

 

[ChristineM]

Therefore, you're not an Atheist.

What are you?

What? I really have no idea how your mind works, you link the most obtuse and irrelevant posts, screw them up in your head to massage your own sensibilities and represent it pretend you know what you are talking about... That is so strange.

Fyi, i am atheist
The definition of atheism comes from the dictionary.

 

[ChristineM]

So you are free to insult anyone who believes gods and religions in Ameristan? There is no morality in Ameristan?

So why do you insult atheists

Or is hypocrisy ok in your book?

 

[Matheist]

What are the steps of reasoning leading from your premises to your conclusions?

P1: DoI unanimously declared God is Nature's God.
P2: Atheism is the disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C: Atheism is the disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of Nature's God
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P1: DoI unanimously declared Law of Nature/Nature's God is the Founding Principles of USA
P2: Atheism is the disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of Nature's God
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C: Atheism is the disbelief or lack of belief in the Founding Principles (Public Policy)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'

Therefore, Founding Principles and Atheism:

Atheism is the disbelief or lack of belief in the "...decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes..." of harmonious ways of life with Nature's God.​

Therefore, Criminal.

 

[Revoltingest]

So why do you insult atheists

Or is hypocrisy ok in your book?

I observe that people will say the cruelest things,
excusing them by claiming "the truth".

 

[Matheist]

So why do you insult atheists

Or is hypocrisy ok in your book?

I'm presenting the Law.

Claim + Reason + Evidence + No Fallacy​

How can it be an insult?



An Atheist have no proof against Nature's God and mere insult.

See the difference?

 

[Matheist]

Fyi, i am atheist

You reject the official definition of Atheism, and claim to be an Atheist? Is that hypocrisy or what?

 

[Revoltingest]

P1: DoI unanimously declared God is Nature's God.

This is not a unanimous view.
Moreover, unanimity of opinion on something does not mean it's correct.

What is "Dol"?

P2: Atheism is the disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C: Atheism is the disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of Nature's God
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This conclusion is a restatement of the premise labelled "P2".

P1: DoI unanimously declared =Law of Nature/Nature's God is the Founding Principles of USA
P2: Atheism is the disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of Nature's God
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C: Atheism is the disbelief or lack of belief in the Founding Principles (Public Policy)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'

Whereas, Founding Principles and Atheism:

We have no founding principles.
Nothing was founded.
We just disbelieve in gods.

Atheism is the disbelief or lack of belief in the "...decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes..." of harmonious ways of life with Nature's God.​

Therefore, Criminal.

Do you advocate prosecution of atheists?

 

[Matheist]

I am.
This is just as you are free to insult them & us too.
It's legal speech.
Do you oppose this liberty?

There are many moralities.

I believe in Truth has no religion, and there is no god higher than Truth (Nature).

What makes you think Truth has a Religion, and yet claim to be smarter than religious people?

 

[Revoltingest]

....claim to be smarter than religious people?

Have I claimed that?
I am smarter than some, & dumber than others.
But no believer here has bested me in brain wrestling.

Back to my question....
Do you advocate prosecuting atheists?

 

[Matheist]

This conclusion is a restatement of the premise labelled "P2".

To begin with, do you even know what is Logic & Logical Structure?

We have no founding principles.
Nothing was founded.
We just disbelieve in gods.

This is delusional. Atheism is not a Country.

Have you ever heard about "Social Contract and the Constitution?"

Do you advocate prosecution of atheists?

I advocate bigots being sent to prison.

Religions was never an issue, it is a myth (propaganda) and the bigots (propagandist) and capitalists (economic slavery) are the real issues.

Your religion is the PROPAGANDA.

 

[Revoltingest]

To begin with, do you even know what is Logic & Logical Structure?

I have a passing familiarity.
But it's been over 4 decades since I took formal logic in school.

This is delusional. Atheism is not a Country.

I didn't say it was.

Have you ever heard about "Social Contract and the Constitution?"

The subjects come up here all the time.
I even knew of them beforehand.
Are you asking for me to explain them to you?

I advocate bigots being sent to prison.

Does this mean that you advocate giving government the
power to determine who is bigoted, & then to imprison them?

Religions was never an issue, it is a myth (propaganda) and the bigots (propagandist) and capitalists (economic slavery) who are the real issues.

Do you oppose capitalism?
What is your proposed alternative?